Senate Introduced Concurrent Resolution
Introduced Concurrent Resolutions appear as they were introduced and reflect no subsequent amendments or changes
Senate Concurrent Resolution 39 of 2006
Sponsors
- Alan Cropsey (District 33)
- Patricia Birkholz (District 24)
- Mike Goschka (District 32)
- Mark Schauer (District 19)
- Michael Switalski (District 10)
- Frank Accavitti (District 42)
- Stephen Adamini (District 109)
- Richard Ball (District 85)
- Steve Bieda (District 25)
- Darwin Booher (District 102)
- Jack Brandenburg (District 24)
- Rich Brown (District 110)
- Pam Byrnes (District 52)
- Bill Caul (District 99)
- Brenda Clack (District 34)
- Paul Condino (District 35)
- George Cushingberry, Jr. (District 8)
- Kevin Elsenheimer (District 105)
- John Espinoza (District 83)
- Barbara Farrah (District 13)
- Matthew Gillard (District 106)
- John Gleason (District 48)
- Lee Gonzales (District 49)
- Robert Gosselin (District 41)
- Goeff Hansen (District 100)
- Hoon-Yung Hopgood (District 22)
- Scott Hummel (District 93)
- Rick Jones (District 71)
- Chris Kolb (District 53)
- LaMar Lemmons, Jr. (District 2)
- Alexander C Lipsey (District 60)
- Andy Meisner (District 27)
- Tom Meyer (District 84)
- Fred Miller (District 31)
- Michael C Murphy (District 68)
- Mike Nofs (District 62)
- John Pastor (District 19)
- Tom Pearce (District 73)
- John M Proos (District 79)
- Michael Sak (District 76)
- Rick Shaffer (District 59)
- Fulton Sheen (District 88)
- Alma Smith (District 54)
- Virgil Smith (District 7)
- Dudley Spade (District 57)
- Glenn Steil (District 72)
- Shelley Taub (District 40)
- Steve Tobocman (District 12)
- Aldo Vagnozzi (District 37)
- Barb Vander Veen (District 89)
Categories
A concurrent resolution to request the State Bar of Michigan and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association to issue a joint report to the Legislature on the number and types of cases and the costs resulting from court-appointed attorneys for indigent criminal cases in Michigan.
Documents
As Adopted by the Senate
The As Adopted by the Senate version is the Concurrent Resolutions, as introduced, that includes any adopted Senate amendments
The As Adopted by the Senate version is the Concurrent Resolutions, as introduced, that includes any adopted Senate amendments
History
(House actions in lowercase, Senate actions in UPPERCASE)Note: A page number of 0 indicates that the page number is coming soon
| Date | Journal | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 2/09/2006 | SJ 12 Pg. 194 | REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY |
| 3/15/2006 | SJ 26 Pg. 450 | REPORTED FAVORABLY WITH SUBSTITUTE S-1 |
| 3/15/2006 | SJ 26 Pg. 450 | PLACED ON ORDER OF RESOLUTIONS |
| 3/22/2006 | SJ 29 Pg. 504 | SUBSTITUTE S-1 ADOPTED |
| 3/22/2006 | SJ 29 Pg. 504 | ADOPTED AS SUBSTITUTED S-1 |
| 3/22/2006 | HJ 30 Pg. 652 | received in House |
| 3/22/2006 | HJ 30 Pg. 652 | referred to Committee on Judiciary |
| 5/24/2006 | HJ 51 Pg. 1281 | reported with recommendation without amendment(s) |
| 5/24/2006 | HJ 51 Pg. 1281 | laid over one day under the rules |
| 6/08/2006 | HJ 58 Pg. 1506 | adopted and returned |
| 6/13/2006 | SJ 58 Pg. 1316 | HOUSE CONCURRENCE RECEIVED |
| 6/13/2006 | SJ 58 Pg. 1316 | REFERRED TO SECRETARY FOR RECORD |