DENTAL BENEFIT PLAN W/O FEE S.B. 1106:

SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL

IN COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 1106 (as introduced 11-13-24)

Sponsor: Senator Jeff Irwin

Committee: Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection

 

Date Completed: 12-10-24

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend the Insurance Code to require a health plan or nonprofit dental care organization that provided dental benefits to have at least one method of payment or reimbursement that provided the dentist or dental therapist with 100% of the amount payable and did not include a fee for the payment or reimbursement.

 

"Health plan" would mean all the following:

 

--   An insurer providing benefits under a health insurance policy, including a policy, certificate, or contract that provides coverage for specific diseases or accidents only, an expense-incurred vision or dental policy, or a hospital indemnity, Medicare supplement, long-term care, or one-time limited duration policy or certificate, but not to payments made to an administrative service only or cost-plus arrangement.

--   A multiple employer welfare arrangement regulated under Chapter 70 (Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements) that provides hospital, medical, surgical, vision, dental, and sick care benefits.[1]

 

The bill would require a health plan or nonprofit dental care organization operating under Public Act 125 of 1963 that provided dental benefits to provide the dentist or dental therapist with 100% of the amount payable and could not require the dentist or dental therapist to incur a fee to access payment or reimbursement.

 

(Public Act 125 of 1963 provides for the incorporation, supervision, and regulation of nonprofit dental care organizations.)

 

The bill would not apply to a fee imposed by the dentist's or dental therapist's financial institution.

 

If the dentist or dental therapist opted out of a method of payment described above, the decision would remain in effect until the dentist or dental therapist opted back into the prior payment plan or a new plan contract was executed.

 

Proposed MCL 500.3406kk

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.

 

Analyst: Nathan Leaman

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.

 



[1] MCL 500.2006