SPECIAL ED HIRING PREFERENCE; REPEAL                                                      H.B. 5796:

                                                                                                    SUMMARY OF BILL

                                                                                      REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

House Bill 5796 (as reported without amendment)

Sponsor:  Representative Phil Potvin

House Committee:  Education

Senate Committee:  Education

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would repeal Section 1766 of the Revised School Code, which requires the board of a constituent district, when employing additional personnel to implement special education programs and services, to hire first an employee of the intermediate school district (ISD) in which it is located whose employment is discontinued because the ISD or State agency located within the district is discontinuing the special education program or service for which the person was employed.

 

The special education personnel employed under this provision are generally entitled to all rights and benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled had they been employed by the constituent school district originally.

 

MCL 380.1766                                                                  Legislative Analyst:  Jeff Mann

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have a minimal fiscal impact on the State and potential savings to certain districts. The bill would remove the priority on hiring special education program employees from current ISD special education employees. This scenario is most likely occur if an ISD is dissolved and consolidated with another ISD, or a district ceases to participate in the ISD. Under the bill, districts would be free to hire additional staff in these situations as they saw fit, which could result in some savings if a district would have had to hire a teacher with many years of services and a high salary. Since ISD consolidation and discontinuation of services are currently rare, the bill would have a minimal impact; however, if these activities did increase, then some districts could experience savings. If the savings were significant, then the State also could experience savings, since the State pays for a portion of special education costs.

 

Date Completed:  12-7-16                                                     Fiscal Analyst:  Cory Savino

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.