CHEM. ANALYSIS OF DRIVER'S SAMPLES S.B. 153:
SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL
IN COMMITTEE
Senate Bill 153 (as introduced 2-24-15)
Sponsor: Senator Wayne Schmidt
CONTENT
The bill would amend the Michigan Vehicle Code to do the following:
-- Specify that, if a driver's urine were obtained for medical treatment after a motor vehicle accident, the results of a chemical analysis of the sample would be admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding to show the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in the urine.
-- Provide that a person would be considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine if a peace office had reasonable cause to believe that the person was the operator of a vehicle that caused an accident resulting in death or great bodily harm.
Admissibility of Urine Analysis
Under the Code, if the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident is transported to a medical facility and a sample of his or her blood is withdrawn at that time for medical treatment, the results of a chemical analysis of that sample are admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding to show the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in his or her blood, regardless of whether the person had been offered or had refused a chemical test.
Under the bill, if the driver's blood were withdrawn or his or her urine were obtained for medical treatment, the results of a chemical analysis of either or both of those samples would be admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding to show the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in the person's blood or urine.
Implied Consent
The Code provides that a person who operates a vehicle upon a public highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, in his or her blood or urine or the amount of alcohol in his or her breath if the person is arrested for any of the following:
-- Various impaired or drunk driving violations.
-- A moving violation causing the death of another person or serious impairment of a body function to another person.
-- Reckless driving causing the death of another person or serious impairment of a body function to another person.
-- Manslaughter or murder resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle when the peace officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating the vehicle while impaired or under the influence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of those substances.
Under the bill, a person also would be considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine if a peace officer had reasonable cause to believe that the person was the operator of a vehicle that caused an accident resulting in death or great bodily harm.
MCL 257.625a & 257.625c Legislative Analyst: Patrick Affholter
FISCAL IMPACT
The bill would have no fiscal impact on State or local government.
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.