HOUSE BILL No. 5123

 

October 26, 2011, Introduced by Reps. Cotter, Heise and Somerville and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

 

     A bill to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled

 

"Michigan vehicle code,"

 

by amending sections 323d and 625h (MCL 257.323d and 257.625h),

 

section 323d as added by 1993 PA 359 and section 625h as amended by

 

1999 PA 73.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 323d. (1) The drug case information management fund is

 

created as a separate fund in the state treasury. The purpose of

 

the fund is to help defray the costs of complying with requirements

 

for the timely management and reporting to the secretary of state

 

of information concerning cases involving an attempt to violate, a

 

conspiracy to violate, or a violation of part 74 or section 17766a

 

of the public health code, Act No. 368 of the Public Acts of 1978,

 

being sections 333.7401 to 333.7461 and 333.17766a of the Michigan

 

Compiled Laws, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7401 to 333.7461, or of a local


 

ordinance that prohibits conduct prohibited under part 74 or

 

section 17766a of Act No. 368 of the Public Acts of 1978. of the

 

public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7401 to 333.7461. Money in

 

the fund shall be expended only as provided in subsection (3).

 

     (2) The state treasurer shall credit the drug case information

 

management fund with the money collected from license reinstatement

 

fees as provided in section 320e(2). 320e(3). The state treasurer

 

may invest money contained in the drug case information management

 

fund in any manner authorized by law for the investment of state

 

money. However, an investment shall not interfere with any

 

apportionment, allocation, or payment of money as required by this

 

section. The state treasurer shall credit all earnings from the

 

fund to the fund. Money in the fund at the end of the fiscal year

 

shall remain in the fund, and shall not revert to the general fund,

 

and shall continue to be available for distribution to ensure best

 

practices are being evaluated, formulated, and implemented by the

 

noncomplying circuit, district, or probate court or other circuit,

 

district, or probate court.

 

     (3) The state court administrator, at the direction of the

 

supreme court and upon confirmation of the amount by the state

 

treasurer, shall distribute money from the drug case information

 

management fund the total amount available in a fiscal year to each

 

circuit of the circuit court, each district of the district court,

 

and each probate court that has fulfilled the requirements

 

established by the state court administrative office to evaluate,

 

formulate, and implement best practices as provided in this

 

subsection. The state court administrator, after reimbursement of


 

costs as provided in this subsection, shall distribute the balance

 

of money from the drug case information management fund annually

 

after costs are disbursed to each circuit of the circuit court,

 

each district of the district court, and each probate court that

 

has fulfilled the requirements established by the state court

 

administrative office to evaluate, formulate, and implement best

 

practices. The money shall be distributed in an amount determined

 

by multiplying the amount available for distribution by a fraction,

 

the numerator of which is the number of cases in which the

 

defendant was charged with an attempt to violate, a conspiracy to

 

violate, or a violation of part 74 or section 17766a of Act No. 368

 

of the Public Acts of 1978, of the public health code, 1978 PA 368,

 

MCL 333.7401 to 333.7461, or a local ordinance that prohibits

 

conduct prohibited under part 74 or section 17766a of Act No. 368

 

of the Public Acts of 1978, of the public health code, 1978 PA 368,

 

MCL 333.7401 to 333.7461, in the prior calendar year in that

 

circuit of the circuit court, that district of the district court,

 

or that probate court, as certified by the state court

 

administrator, and the denominator of which is the total number of

 

cases in all circuits of the circuit court, all districts of the

 

district court, and all probate courts in which the defendant was

 

charged with an attempt to violate, a conspiracy to violate, or a

 

violation of part 74 of section 17766a of Act No. 368 of the Public

 

Acts of 1978, of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7401

 

to 333.7461, or a local ordinance that prohibits conduct prohibited

 

under that part. 74 or section 17766a of Act No. 368 of the Public

 

Acts of 1978. The state court administrative office shall be


 

reimbursed annually from the drug case information management fund

 

for all reasonable costs associated with the administration of this

 

section, including judicial and staff training, on-site management

 

assistance, forms development and conversion, and software

 

development and conversion.

 

     (4) As used in this section, "best practices" means a set of

 

methods and processes used by courts to improve performance and

 

efficiency, as determined by the state court administrative office,

 

including, but not limited to, the following categories:

 

     (a) Category 1, accountability and transparency, requires each

 

eligible court to certify that it has produced, and made readily

 

available to the public over the internet, a performance dashboard

 

approved by the state court administrative office.

 

     (b) Category 2, consolidation of services, requires each

 

eligible court to certify that it has entered into, and made

 

readily available to the public over the internet, a concurrent

 

jurisdiction plan and a consolidation plan to increase its existing

 

level of cooperation, collaboration, and cooperation with other

 

courts.

 

     (c) Category 3, court improvement and technology, requires

 

each eligible court to certify that it has produced, and made

 

readily available to the public over the internet, a plan for the

 

effective use of technology and court improvement as determined by

 

the state court administrative office that includes, but is not

 

limited to, performance measures.

 

     Sec. 625h. (1) The drunk driving prevention equipment and

 

training fund is created as a separate fund in the state treasury.


 

Money in the fund shall be expended only as provided in subsection

 

(2). The state treasurer shall credit to the fund all money

 

received for that purpose under section 320e , and as otherwise

 

provided by law. The state treasurer shall invest money in the fund

 

in the same manner as surplus funds are invested under section 143

 

3 of 1855 PA 105, MCL 21.143. Earnings from the fund shall be

 

credited to the fund. Money in the fund at the end of the fiscal

 

year shall remain in the fund , and shall not revert to the general

 

fund.

 

     (2) The department of state police shall administer the fund.

 

Money in the fund shall be used only to administer the fund, to

 

purchase and maintain breath alcohol testing equipment, and to

 

provide training to law enforcement personnel of this state in the

 

use of that breath alcohol testing equipment.

 

     (3) The department of treasury shall, before November 1 of

 

each year, notify the department of state police of the balance in

 

the fund at the close of the preceding fiscal year.

 

     (4) The department of state police shall promulgate rules to

 

implement subsection (2).

 

     (5) The drunk driving caseflow assistance fund is created as a

 

separate fund in the state treasury. The purpose of the fund is to

 

promote the timely disposition of cases in which the defendant is

 

charged with a violation of any of the following or a local

 

ordinance substantially corresponding to any of the following:

 

     (a) Section 625 or 625m.

 

     (b) Section 80176, 81134, 81135, or 82127 of the natural

 

resources and environmental protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL


 

324.80176, 324.81134, 324.81135, and 324.82127.

 

     (6) Money in the fund shall be expended only as provided in

 

subsection (8).

 

     (7) The state treasurer shall credit the drunk driving

 

caseflow assistance fund with deposits of proceeds from the

 

collection of revenue from license reinstatement fees as provided

 

for in section 320e , and all income from investment credited to

 

the fund by the state treasurer. The state treasurer may invest

 

money contained in the drunk driving caseflow assistance fund in

 

any manner authorized by law for the investment of state money.

 

However, an investment shall not interfere with any apportionment,

 

allocation, or payment of money as required by this section. The

 

state treasurer shall credit to the fund all income earned as a

 

result of an investment. Money in the fund at the end of the fiscal

 

year shall remain in the fund and shall not revert to the general

 

fund, and shall continue to be available for distribution to ensure

 

best practices are being evaluated, formulated, and implemented by

 

the noncomplying district or municipal court or other district or

 

municipal court.

 

     (8) The state court administrator, at the direction of the

 

supreme court and upon confirmation of the amount by the state

 

treasurer, shall distribute money from the drunk driving caseflow

 

assistance fund the total amount available in a fiscal year to each

 

district of the district court and each municipal court that

 

fulfills the requirements established by the state court

 

administrative office to evaluate, formulate, and implement best

 

practices as provided in this section. The state court


 

administrator, after reimbursement of costs as provided in this

 

subsection, shall distribute the balance of money from the drunk

 

driving caseflow assistance fund annually to each district of the

 

district court and each municipal court that fulfills the

 

requirements established by the state court administrative office

 

to evaluate, formulate, and implement best practices. The money

 

shall be distributed in an amount determined by multiplying the

 

amount available for distribution by a fraction, the numerator of

 

which is the number of cases in which the defendant was charged

 

with a violation enumerated in subsection (5) in the prior calendar

 

year in that district of the district court or that municipal court

 

as certified by the state court administrator and the denominator

 

of which is the total number of cases in all districts of the

 

district court and all municipal courts in which the defendant was

 

charged with a violation enumerated in subsection (5) in the

 

calendar year. The state court administrative office shall be

 

reimbursed annually from the drunk driving caseflow assistance fund

 

for all reasonable costs associated with the administration of this

 

section, including judicial and staff training, on-site management

 

assistance, and software development and conversion.

 

     (9) As used in this section, "best practices" means a set of

 

methods and processes used by courts to improve performance and

 

efficiency, as determined by the state court administrative office,

 

including, but not limited to, the following categories:

 

     (a) Category 1, accountability and transparency, requires each

 

eligible court to certify that it has produced, and made readily

 

available to the public over the internet, a performance dashboard


 

approved by the state court administrative office.

 

     (b) Category 2, consolidation of services, requires each

 

eligible court to certify that it has entered into, and made

 

readily available to the public over the internet, a concurrent

 

jurisdiction plan and a consolidation plan to increase its existing

 

level of cooperation, collaboration, and cooperation with other

 

courts.

 

     (c) Category 3, court improvement and technology, requires

 

each eligible court to certify that it has produced, and made

 

readily available to the public over the internet, a plan for the

 

effective use of technology and court improvement as determined by

 

the state court administrative office that includes, but is not

 

limited to, performance measures.