SB-1117, As Passed Senate, November 29, 2012

 

 

Text Box: SENATE BILL No. 1117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SENATE BILL No. 1117

 

 

May 3, 2012, Introduced by Senators MOOLENAAR, MEEKHOF and SMITH and referred to the Committee on Insurance.

 

 

 

     A bill to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled

 

"Revised judicature act of 1961,"

 

by amending sections 2169 and 2912 (MCL 600.2169 and 600.2912),

 

section 2169 as amended by 1993 PA 78.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 2169. (1) In an action alleging medical malpractice, a

 

person shall not give expert testimony on the appropriate standard

 

of practice or care against or on behalf of a party who is a

 

licensed health professional unless the person is licensed as a

 

health professional in this state or another state and meets the

 

following criteria:

 

     (a) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony

 

is offered is a specialist, specializes at the time of the

 

occurrence that is the basis for the action in the same specialty

 


as the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is

 

offered. However, if the party against whom or on whose behalf the

 

testimony is offered is a specialist who is board certified, the

 

expert witness must be a specialist who is board certified in that

 

specialty.

 

     (b) Subject to subdivision (c), during the year immediately

 

preceding the date of the occurrence that is the basis for the

 

claim or action, devoted a majority of his or her professional time

 

to either or both of the following:

 

     (i) The active clinical practice of the same health profession

 

in which the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is

 

offered is licensed and, if that party is a specialist, the active

 

clinical practice of that specialty.

 

     (ii) The instruction of students in an accredited health

 

professional school or accredited residency or clinical research

 

program in the same health profession in which the party against

 

whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered is licensed and,

 

if that party is a specialist, an accredited health professional

 

school or accredited residency or clinical research program in the

 

same specialty.

 

     (c) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony

 

is offered is a general practitioner, the expert witness, during

 

the year immediately preceding the date of the occurrence that is

 

the basis for the claim or action, devoted a majority of his or her

 

professional time to either or both of the following:

 

     (i) Active clinical practice as a general practitioner.

 

     (ii) Instruction of students in an accredited health

 


professional school or accredited residency or clinical research

 

program in the same health profession in which the party against

 

whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered is licensed.

 

     (2) In an action alleging medical malpractice, a person shall

 

not give expert testimony on the appropriate standard of practice

 

or care against or on behalf of a party who is not a licensed

 

health professional unless the person meets the following criteria:

 

     (a) Specializes at the time of the occurrence that is the

 

basis for the action in the same health profession as the party

 

against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered.

 

     (b) During the year immediately preceding the date of the

 

occurrence that is the basis for the claim or action, devoted a

 

majority of his or her professional time to either or both of the

 

following:

 

     (i) The active clinical practice of the same health profession

 

as the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is

 

offered.

 

     (ii) The instruction of students in an accredited health

 

professional school or accredited residency or clinical research

 

program in the same health profession as the party against whom or

 

on whose behalf the testimony is offered.

 

     (3) (2) In determining the qualifications of an expert witness

 

in an action alleging medical malpractice, the court shall, at a

 

minimum, evaluate all of the following:

 

     (a) The educational and professional training of the expert

 

witness.

 

     (b) The area of specialization of the expert witness.

 


     (c) The length of time the expert witness has been engaged in

 

the active clinical practice or instruction of the health

 

profession or the specialty.

 

     (d) The relevancy of the expert witness's testimony.

 

     (4) (3) This section does not limit the power of the trial

 

court to disqualify an expert witness on grounds other than the

 

qualifications set forth in this section.

 

     (5) (4) In an action alleging medical malpractice, an expert

 

witness shall not testify on a contingency fee basis. A person who

 

violates this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor.

 

     (6) (5) In an action alleging medical malpractice, all of the

 

following limitations apply to discovery conducted by opposing

 

counsel to determine whether or not an expert witness is qualified:

 

     (a) Tax returns of the expert witness are not discoverable.

 

     (b) Family members of the expert witness shall not be deposed

 

concerning the amount of time the expert witness spends engaged in

 

the practice of his or her health profession.

 

     (c) A personal diary or calendar belonging to the expert

 

witness is not discoverable. As used in this subdivision, "personal

 

diary or calendar" means a diary or calendar that does not include

 

listings or records of professional activities.

 

     Sec. 2912. (1) A civil action for malpractice may be

 

maintained against any person professing or holding himself or

 

herself out to be a member of a state licensed profession. The

 

rules of the common law applicable to actions against members of a

 

state licensed profession , for malpractice , are applicable

 

against any person who holds himself or herself out to be a member

 


Senate Bill No. 1117 as amended November 29, 2012

 

of a state licensed profession.

 

     (2) A civil action for medical malpractice may be maintained

 

against any person who is or who holds himself or herself out to be

 

a licensed health care professional, licensed health facility or

 

agency, or an employee or agent of a licensed health facility or

 

agency and who is engaging in or otherwise assisting in medical

 

care and treatment, regardless of whether the person is engaging in

 

the practice of the health profession in a sole proprietorship,

 

partnership, professional corporation, or other business entity. <<AS

USED IN THIS SUBSECTION, "LICENSED HEALTH FACILITY OR AGENCY" DOES

NOT INCLUDE A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION AS THAT TERM IS

DEFINED IN SECTION 3501 OF THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956, 1956 PA 218,

MCL 500.3501.>>

 

     (3) (2) Malpractice may be given in evidence in defense to any

 

an action for services rendered by the a member of a state licensed

 

profession, or a person holding himself or herself out to be a

 

member of a state licensed profession, or an unlicensed individual

 

described in subsection (2).

 

     (4) As used in this section, "person" means an individual,

 

partnership, corporation, association, governmental entity, or

 

other legal entity.

<<Enacting section 1. Sections 2169 and 2912 of the revised

judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.2169 and 600.2912, as

amended by this amendatory act apply only to actions in which the

cause of action arose on or after the effective date of this

amendatory act.>>