INCOME TAX RATE REDUCTION;
PERSONAL EXEMPTION INCREASE
House Bill 5699 (reported without amendment)
Sponsor: Rep. Edward McBroom
House Bill 5700 (reported without amendment)
Sponsor: Rep. Holly Hughes
Committee: Tax Policy
Complete to 6-4-12
A REVISED SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILLS 5699 & 5700 AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE
Each bill would amend the Income Tax Act.
The state income tax rate is currently 4.35%. It is scheduled to drop to 4.25% on January 1, 2013. House Bill 5699 would instead reduce the rate to 4.25% on October 1, 2012, three months earlier. (MCL 206.51)
House Bill 5700 would increase the personal exemption to $3,950 from October 1, 2012, until January 1, 2014; and to at least $4,000 beginning January 1, 2014. (Proposed MCL 206.30a) As now, the personal exemption would be multiplied by the number of personal or dependency exemptions allowable on a taxpayer's federal income tax return.
The personal exemption currently is $3,700. That figure is adjusted for inflation annually, beginning January 1, 2013, rounded to the nearest $100. The bill specifies that the personal exemption would be the inflation-adjusted number derived from current law or the specific figure cited above, whichever is greater. At some point, the current exemption plus inflation will exceed $4,000, and that higher amount will be the amount of the exemption. [An exemption reduces the amount of income subject to tax.]
The two bills are not tie-barred, meaning they need not both be enacted for either to take effect.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These bills would reduce State revenue by an estimated $103 million ($91 million for GF/GP and $12 million for the School Aid Fund) for FY 2012-13. Also, depending on inflation, these bills would reduce State revenue by an estimated $36 million in FY 2013-14, $32 million in FY 2014-15, and $8 million in FY 2015-16.
For the distribution of the revenue loss, see the chart on the following page.
Estimated Fiscal Impact of HB 5699 and HB 5700 |
|||
millions of dollars |
|||
School |
|||
Fiscal Year |
GF/GP |
Aid Fund |
Total |
2012-13 |
-91 |
-12 |
-103 |
2013-14 |
-28 |
-9 |
-36 |
2014-15 |
-24 |
-8 |
-32 |
2015-16 |
-6 |
-2 |
-8 |
Legislative Analyst: Chris Couch
Fiscal Analyst: Rebecca Ross
Jim Stansell
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.