HOUSE BILL No. 5433

 

November 10, 2005, Introduced by Reps. Accavitti, Bieda, Tobocman, Farrah, Vagnozzi, Zelenko and Wojno and referred to the Committee on Health Policy.

 

     A bill to amend 1974 PA 258, entitled

 

"Mental health code,"

 

by amending section 617 (MCL 330.1617).

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 617. (1) A respondent in a guardianship proceeding

 

conducted  pursuant to  under this chapter may demand that a jury

 

decide any issue or issues of fact. A jury shall consist of 6

 

persons to be chosen in the same manner as provided in the probate

 

court rules.

 

     (2) A respondent in a guardianship proceeding conducted

 

pursuant to  under this chapter  shall have  has the right to

 

present evidence, and to confront and cross-examine all witnesses.

 

     (3) The hearing may be closed to the public on the request of

 

the respondent or the respondent's legal counsel.


 

     (4)  The respondent shall be present at all proceedings

 

conducted pursuant to this chapter. However, the respondent's

 

presence may be excused by the court only on a showing, supported

 

by an affidavit signed by a physician or psychologist who has

 

recently examined the respondent, that the respondent's attendance

 

would subject him or her to serious risk of physical or emotional

 

harm.  The respondent is entitled to be present at the hearing in

 

person and to see or hear all evidence bearing upon the

 

respondent's condition. If the respondent wishes to be present at

 

the hearing, all practical steps shall be taken to ensure his or

 

her presence, including, if necessary, moving the hearing site.

 

     (5) A guardian shall not be appointed under this section

 

unless the person who prepared the report or at least 1 of the

 

persons who performed an evaluation serving in part as basis for

 

the report testifies in person in court.

 

     (6) The respondent has the right, at his or her own expense,

 

or if the respondent is indigent, at the expense of the state, to

 

secure an independent evaluation. Compensation for an independent

 

evaluation at public expense shall be in an amount  which  that is

 

reasonable and based upon time and expenses and approved by the

 

court.