SB-0669, As Passed Senate, October 6, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBSTITUTE FOR

 

SENATE BILL NO. 669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     A bill to amend 1998 PA 381, entitled

 

"Michigan agricultural processing act,"

 

by amending section 4 (MCL 289.824).

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 4. (1) The Michigan commission of agriculture shall

 

request the director of the Michigan department of agriculture or

 

his or her designee to investigate all nuisance complaints under

 

this act involving a processing operation. If a person is granted a

 

determination by the director of the department of agriculture

 

under this act, the person is considered to have exhausted his or

 

her administrative remedies with regard to that matter. A court

 

shall not proceed with an action for nuisance brought against a

 

processing operation until it finds that the complainant exhausted

 


all administrative remedies.

 

     (2) The Michigan commission of agriculture and the director of

 

the Michigan department of agriculture may enter into a memorandum

 

of understanding with the Michigan department of environmental

 

quality. The investigation and resolution of nuisance complaints

 

shall be conducted pursuant to the memorandum of understanding. In

 

the case where no generally accepted fruit, vegetable, dairy

 

product, and grain processing practices have been established, any

 

nuisance complaint received by either the department of

 

environmental quality or the department of agriculture shall be

 

resolved under section 3 in the following manner:

 

     (a) The department of environmental quality shall assess

 

compliance of an operation or practice with the natural resources

 

and environmental protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.101 to

 

324.90106, and shall conduct an inspection within 10 working days

 

of receipt of the complaint.

 

     (b) The department of agriculture shall assess the processing

 

operation or practice under federal good manufacturing practices as

 

adopted under the food law of 2000, 2000 PA 92, MCL 289.1101 to

 

289.8111, and shall conduct an inspection within 10 working days of

 

receipt of the complaint.

 

     (3) Based upon the determinations made in subsection (2), the

 

department of agriculture shall make a finding as to whether a

 

processing operation is in compliance with this act.

 

     (4)  (3)  If the director of the Michigan department of

 

agriculture or his or her designee finds upon investigation that

 

the person responsible for the processing operation is using

 


generally accepted fruit, vegetable, dairy product, and grain

 

processing practices or otherwise in compliance with law as

 

described in section 3(2), the director of the Michigan department

 

of agriculture or his or her designee shall notify that person and

 

the complainant of this finding in writing. If the director of the

 

Michigan department of agriculture or his or her designee

 

identifies the source or potential sources of the problem caused by

 

the use of other than generally accepted fruit, vegetable, dairy

 

product, and grain processing practices or other than compliance

 

with law as described in section 3(2), the director of the Michigan

 

department of agriculture or his or her designee shall advise the

 

person responsible for the processing operation that necessary

 

changes should be made to resolve or abate the problem and to

 

conform with generally accepted fruit, vegetable, dairy product,

 

and grain processing practices or with applicable law as described

 

in section 3(2). The director of the Michigan department of

 

agriculture or his or her designee shall determine if those changes

 

are implemented and shall notify the person responsible for the

 

processing operation and the complainant of this determination in

 

writing.

 

     (5)  (4)  A complainant who brings more than 3 unverified

 

nuisance complaints against the same processing operation within 3

 

years may be ordered by the director of the Michigan department of

 

agriculture to pay to the Michigan department of agriculture the

 

full costs of investigation of any fourth or subsequent unverified

 

nuisance complaint against the same processing operation. As used

 

in this subsection, "unverified nuisance complaint" means a

 


nuisance complaint in which the director of the department of

 

agriculture or his or her designee determines that the processing

 

operation is using generally accepted fruit, vegetable, dairy

 

product, and grain processing practices.

 

     Enacting section 1.  This amendatory act does not take effect

 

unless Senate Bill No. 668 of the 93rd Legislature is enacted into

 

law.