EXCEPTIONS TO ITEM PRICING:

House Bill 4636

Sponsor:  Rep. Dave Hildenbrand

Committee:  Commerce

Complete to 6-20-05

A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILL 4636 AS INTRODUCED 4-20-05

The bill would amend the Consumer Item Pricing Act (MCL 445.353 and 445.353a) to provide exceptions to the act’s requirements that the total price of a consumer item displayed or offered for retail sale must be clearly and conspicuously indicated so as to be readable and understandable by visual inspection and be stamped on or affixed to the consumer item.  [The act would be renamed the Pricing Modernization Act.]  The exceptions would apply only to consumer items that were not food items or nonprescription medicines and only when all of the following conditions were met.

·                    At the point of display of the consumer item, there would have to be a label or sign posted immediately above, below, or adjacent to the item that clearly and conspicuously displayed to the consumer the total price of the item in Arabic numerals and a description of the item, including the product name or description, brand, and size.

·                    The retailer would have to use an automatic checkout system audited at least every calendar quarter by an independent certified public accountant or accounting firm, and would need to receive from that audit a certificate of compliance that during the preceding calendar quarter the checkout system either demonstrated an accuracy rate of not less than 98 percent or had an error rate of not greater than 2 percent. 

·                    The retailer would have to provide at least one remote UPC code scanner for each 5,000 square feet of retail floor space in each retail store location or at least one remote UPC code scanner for each 10,000 square feet or retail space, depending on the characteristics of the scanner.  In either case, the scanner would have to be compatible with and synchronized with the UPC scanning capability of the retailer’s automatic checkout system used at the point of sale; be readily accessible to consumers and located in a convenient place within the store; and display the price of a consumer item scanned by a consumer in Arabic numerals.  If the scanner was meeting the 10,000 square foot requirement, it also would have to allow a consumer to print the price of a consumer item on a label that the consumer can affix to the item.

Items Not Price Marked.  Currently, a retailer can choose to not individually price mark up to 25 classes of items or individual items, which must then be listed and posted in a conspicuous place in the store.  The bill would increase the number of exempt items to 75.

Currently the act exempts an item with a total price of 30 cents or less.  The bill would increase that amount to 99 cents or less.  Also exempt are live plants, and the bill would add "trees, seeds, or bulbs."

Error Rates.  In determining an accuracy rate or error rate, the accountant or accounting firm would have to include overcharges but not undercharges and could use recognized sampling techniques.  A retailer would be required to maintain audit reports and certificates of compliance for five years and make them available to the director of the Department of Agriculture on request.  The retailer would have to post the most recent certificate of compliance in a conspicuous location in the retail store.

Correcting Deficiencies.  A retailer that failed to meet accuracy and certification requirements would have 30 days to correct system deficiencies and obtain a recertification.  If the retailer failed to obtain recertification, the exceptions in the bill would not apply to the items in the retail store for at least 180 days.

Violations and Penalties.  The bill contains penalties for violations that are double the penalties currently found in the item pricing law.  A consumer who suffered a loss because the price charged was greater than the displayed price would be required to notify the retailer in person or in writing of the discrepancy within 30 days.  If the retailer, within two days of  notification, tendered to the consumer an amount equal to the discrepancy plus an amount equal to 20 times that amount (rather than 10 times as for item pricing violations) but not less than $2 or more than $10 (rather than $1 and $5), the consumer would be barred from further recovery.  If the loss was suffered by one consumer within one transaction on two or more identical items, the retailer would have to tender the difference on each item but the penalty would be the same as for a single item.  If the retailer did not tender the amount, the consumer could bring or join a legal action.  Under the bill, it would be prima facie evidence of a violation if a price charged or attempted to be charged as a result of electronic identification or calculation by an automatic checkout system exceeded the price displayed on a sign or displayed by a remote UPC code scanner.  These provisions would not apply in cases where a retailer intentionally charged more for an item than the posted price or the price displayed by a remote UPC code scanner. 

Implementation and Administration.  The director of the Department of Agriculture would be responsible for implementing and administering the provisions of the bill.  The department could promulgate rules under the Administrative Procedures Act regarding audit and certification standards for automatic checkout systems and remote UPC code scanners.

                                                                                           Legislative Analyst:   Chris Couch             

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.