SENATE BILL No. 428

April 26, 2001, Introduced by Senators HAMMERSTROM, JOHNSON, MC MANUS,

GARCIA and SCOTT and referred to the Committee on Families, Mental Health

and Human Services.

A bill to amend 1970 PA 91, entitled

"Child custody act of 1970,"

by amending sections 2 and 5 (MCL 722.22 and 722.25), section 2

as amended by 1999 PA 156 and section 5 as amended by 1993 PA

259.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

1 Sec. 2. As used in this act:

2 (a) "Agency" means a legally authorized public or private

3 organization, or governmental unit or official, whether of this

4 state or of another state or country, concerned in the welfare of

5 minor children, including a licensed child placement agency.

6 (b) "Attorney" means, if appointed to represent a child

7 under this act, an attorney serving as the child's legal advocate

8 in a traditional attorney-client relationship with the child, as

9 governed by the Michigan rules of professional conduct. An

03338'01 GWH

2

1 attorney defined under this subdivision owes the same duties of

2 undivided loyalty, confidentiality, and zealous representation of

3 the child's expressed wishes as the attorney would to an adult

4 client.

5 (c) "Child" means minor child and children. Subject to

6 section 4a, for purposes of providing support, child includes a

7 child and children who have reached 18 years of age.

8 (D) "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" MEANS THAT TERM AS DEFINED IN SEC-

9 TION 1 OF 1978 PA 389, MCL 400.1501.

10 (E) (d) "Guardian ad litem" means an individual whom the

11 court appoints to assist the court in determining the child's

12 best interests. A guardian ad litem does not need to be an

13 attorney.

14 (F) (e) "Lawyer-guardian ad litem" means an attorney

15 appointed under section 4. A lawyer-guardian ad litem represents

16 the child, and has the powers and duties, as set forth in section

17 4.

18 (G) (f) "State disbursement unit" or "SDU" means the

19 entity established in section 6 of the office of child support

20 act, 1971 PA 174, MCL 400.236.

21 (H) (g) "Third person" means any AN individual other

22 than a parent.

23 Sec. 5. (1) If a child custody dispute is between the par-

24 ents, between agencies, or between third persons, the best inter-

25 ests of the child control. If the child custody dispute is

26 between the parent or parents and an agency or a third person,

27 the court shall presume that the best interests of the child are

03338'01

3

1 served by awarding custody to the parent or parents, unless the

2 contrary is established by clear and convincing evidence.

3 (2) Notwithstanding other provisions of this act, if a child

4 custody dispute involves a child who is conceived as the result

5 of acts for which 1 of the child's biological parents is con-

6 victed of criminal sexual conduct as provided in sections 520a to

7 520e and 520g of the Michigan penal code, Act No. 328 of the

8 Public Acts of 1931, being sections 750.520a to 750.520e and

9 750.520g of the Michigan Compiled Laws 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.520A

10 TO 750.520E AND 750.520G, the court shall not award custody to

11 the convicted biological parent. This subsection does not apply

12 to a conviction under section 520d(1)(a) of the Michigan penal

13 code, Act No. 328 of the Public Acts of 1931, being section

14 750.520d of the Michigan Compiled Laws 1931 PA 328, MCL

15 750.520D. This subsection does not apply if, after the date of

16 the conviction, the biological parents cohabit and establish a

17 mutual custodial environment for the child.

18 (3) Notwithstanding other provisions of this act, if an

19 individual is convicted of criminal sexual conduct as provided in

20 sections 520a to 520e and 520g of Act No. 328 of the Public Acts

21 of 1931 THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.520A TO

22 750.520E AND 750.520G, and the victim is the individual's child,

23 the court shall not award custody of that child or a sibling of

24 that child to that individual, unless both the child's other

25 parent and, if the court considers the child or sibling to be of

26 sufficient age to express his or her desires, the child or

27 sibling consent to the custody.

03338'01

4

1 (4) NOTWITHSTANDING OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT, IF THE

2 COURT DETERMINES THAT A PARTY TO A CHILD CUSTODY ACTION HAS A

3 HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY, A REBUTTA-

4 BLE PRESUMPTION ARISES THAT IT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE CHILD AND

5 NOT IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS FOR THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PER-

6 PETRATOR TO BE AWARDED SOLE CUSTODY, JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY, OR

7 JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY OF THE CHILD. THE COURT MAY FIND A HIS-

8 TORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IF THE COURT FINDS THAT A SINGLE INCI-

9 DENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESULTED IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR

10 INVOLVED THE USE OF A WEAPON, OR THAT THERE HAS BEEN MORE THAN 1

11 INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT EACH

12 PARTY HAS A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY,

13 THE COURT SHALL APPLY THE PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF THE PARTY

14 DETERMINED TO BE LESS LIKELY TO CONTINUE TO PERPETRATE DOMESTIC

15 VIOLENCE.

16 (5) A PRESUMPTION THAT ARISES UNDER SUBSECTION (4) IS

17 REBUTTED IF IT IS DEMONSTRATED THAT AN AWARD OF SOLE CUSTODY,

18 JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY, OR JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY TO THE PERPETRATOR

19 IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD AND THAT THERE EXISTS NO

20 SIGNIFICANT RISK OF FUTURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST A CHILD OR

21 ADULT LIVING IN THE HOME OR AGAINST ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER,

22 INCLUDING ANOTHER PARTY TO THE CASE.

03338'01 Final page. GWH