2002-HJ-04-11-031.htm

No. 31

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOURNAL

OF THE

House of Representatives

91st Legislature

REGULAR SESSION OF 2002

House Chamber, Lansing, Thursday, April 11, 2002.

12:01 a.m.

The House was called to order by Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Julian.

The roll was called by the Clerk of the House of Representatives, who announced that a quorum was present.

Adamini--present

Allen--present

Anderson--present

Basham--present

Bernero--present

Birkholz--present

Bisbee--present

Bishop--present

Bogardus--present

Bovin--present

Bradstreet--present

Brown, Bob--present

Brown, Cameron--present

Brown, Rich--present

Callahan--present

Cassis--present

Caul--present

Clark--present

Clarke--present

Daniels--present

Dennis--present

DeRossett--present

DeVuyst--present

DeWeese--present

Drolet--present

Ehardt--present

Faunce--present

Frank--present

Garza--excused

George--present

Gieleghem--present

Gilbert--present

Godchaux--present

Gosselin--present

Hager--present

Hale--present

Hansen--present

Hardman--present

Hart--present

Howell--present

Hummel--present

Jacobs--present

Jamnick--present

Jansen--present

Jelinek--present

Johnson, Rick--present

Johnson, Ruth--present

Julian--present

Koetje--present

Kolb--present

Kooiman--present

Kowall--present

Kuipers--present

LaSata--present

Lemmons--present

Lipsey--present

Lockwood--present

Mans--present

McConico--present

Mead--present

Meyer--present

Middaugh--present

Minore--present

Mortimer--present

Murphy--e/d/s

Neumann--present

Newell--present

O'Neil--present

Palmer--present

Pappageorge--present

Patterson--present

Pestka--present

Phillips--present

Plakas--present

Pumford--present

Quarles--present

Raczkowski--present

Reeves--present

Richardville--present

Richner--present

Rison--present

Rivet--present

Rocca--present

Schauer--present

Schermesser--present

Scranton--e/d/s

Shackleton--present

Sheltrown--present

Shulman--present

Spade--present

Stallworth--present

Stamas--present

Stewart--present

Switalski--present

Tabor--present

Thomas--present

Toy--present

Van Woerkom--present

Vander Roest--present

Vander Veen--present

Vear--present

Voorhees--present

Waters--present

Whitmer--excused

Williams--present

Wojno--present

Woodward--present

Woronchak--present

Zelenko--present

e/d/s = entered during session

Rep. Julie Dennis, from the 92nd District, offered the following invocation:

"We come here today to do the will of the people of the state of Michigan and hopefully God's will. We had a tremendous opportunity here. I hope and I pray that we all wish for God's blessing on the forty percent of the people who are going to see no increase in unemployment benefits. Amen."

______

Rep. Jacobs moved that Reps. Garza and Whitmer be excused from today's session.

The motion prevailed.

Third Reading of Bills

Senate Bill No. 907, entitled

A bill to amend 1925 PA 177, entitled "An act to protect and promote the public health and welfare, and to provide for the construction, maintenance and operation of hospitals and sanatoriums for the treatment of tuberculosis; and to make an appropriation therefor," by amending sections 9 and 14 (MCL 332.159 and 332.164).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 449 Yeas--104

Adamini Faunce LaSata Rivet

Allen Frank Lemmons Rocca

Anderson George Lipsey Schauer

Basham Gieleghem Lockwood Schermesser

Bernero Gilbert Mans Shackleton

Birkholz Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Bisbee Gosselin Mead Shulman

Bishop Hager Meyer Spade

Bogardus Hale Middaugh Stallworth

Bovin Hansen Minore Stamas

Bradstreet Hardman Mortimer Stewart

Brown, B. Hart Neumann Switalski

Brown, C. Howell Newell Tabor

Brown, R. Hummel O'Neil Thomas

Callahan Jacobs Palmer Toy

Cassis Jamnick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Patterson Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Pestka Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vear

Daniels Johnson, Ruth Plakas Voorhees

Dennis Julian Pumford Waters

DeRossett Koetje Raczkowski Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Reeves Wojno

DeWeese Kooiman Richardville Woodward

Drolet Kowall Richner Woronchak

Ehardt Kuipers Rison Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 908, entitled

A bill to amend 1947 PA 4, entitled "An act to authorize and provide for the borrowing of $270,000,000.00 to make payments to persons who served in the military, naval, marine or coast guard forces of the United States, including women serving in auxiliary branches thereof, or to their next of kin or estates, and the issuance of certain serial bonds and serial notes for such indebtedness; to create a veterans' military pay fund and a veterans' bond redemption fund; to pledge the full faith and credit of the state; to provide for the payment of principal and interest on such serial obligations; to make appropriations therefor; and to make such serial notes and serial bonds exempt from taxation," by amending section 1 (MCL 35.901).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 450 Yeas--105

Adamini Frank Lemmons Rivet

Allen George Lipsey Rocca

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Basham Gilbert Mans Schermesser

Bernero Godchaux McConico Shackleton

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Sheltrown

Bisbee Hager Meyer Shulman

Bishop Hale Middaugh Spade

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stallworth

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Stamas

Bradstreet Hart Neumann Stewart

Brown, B. Howell Newell Switalski

Brown, C. Hummel O'Neil Tabor

Brown, R. Jacobs Palmer Thomas

Callahan Jamnick Pappageorge Toy

Cassis Jansen Patterson Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Pestka Vander Roest

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Plakas Vear

Daniels Julian Pumford Voorhees

Dennis Koetje Quarles Waters

DeRossett Kolb Raczkowski Williams

DeVuyst Kooiman Reeves Wojno

DeWeese Kowall Richardville Woodward

Drolet Kuipers Richner Woronchak

Ehardt LaSata Rison Zelenko

Faunce

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 909, entitled

A bill to amend 1947 PA 12, entitled "Veterans' military pay act," by amending section 8 (MCL 35.928).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 451 Yeas--104

Adamini Faunce LaSata Rivet

Allen Frank Lemmons Rocca

Anderson George Lipsey Schauer

Basham Gieleghem Lockwood Schermesser

Bernero Gilbert Mans Shackleton

Birkholz Godchaux Mead Sheltrown

Bisbee Gosselin Meyer Shulman

Bishop Hager Middaugh Spade

Bogardus Hale Minore Stallworth

Bovin Hansen Mortimer Stamas

Bradstreet Hardman Neumann Stewart

Brown, B. Hart Newell Switalski

Brown, C. Howell O'Neil Tabor

Brown, R. Hummel Palmer Thomas

Callahan Jacobs Pappageorge Toy

Cassis Jamnick Patterson Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Pestka Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Phillips Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Plakas Vear

Daniels Johnson, Ruth Pumford Voorhees

Dennis Julian Quarles Waters

DeRossett Koetje Raczkowski Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Reeves Wojno

DeWeese Kooiman Richardville Woodward

Drolet Kowall Richner Woronchak

Ehardt Kuipers Rison Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to provide for payments to persons who served in the armed forces of the United States between September 16, 1940, and June 30, 1946, and to beneficiaries of such persons; to provide for payments to persons entitled to benefits under section 25, article X of the constitution of this state; to prescribe the powers and duties of the state administrative board and state officers with respect thereto; to provide for acceptance of financial and other assistance from the federal government; to provide for certain administrative expenses; to make certain appropriations; and to prescribe penalties for violations of the provisions of this act,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 910, entitled

A bill to amend 1955 PA 8, entitled "Korean veterans' military pay fund act of 1955," by amending sections 7 and 9 (MCL 35.977 and 35.979).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 452 Yeas--104

Adamini Faunce LaSata Rison

Allen Frank Lemmons Rivet

Anderson George Lipsey Rocca

Basham Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Bernero Gilbert Mans Schermesser

Birkholz Godchaux McConico Shackleton

Bisbee Gosselin Mead Sheltrown

Bishop Hager Meyer Shulman

Bogardus Hale Middaugh Spade

Bovin Hansen Minore Stallworth

Bradstreet Hardman Mortimer Stamas

Brown, B. Hart Neumann Stewart

Brown, C. Howell Newell Switalski

Brown, R. Hummel O'Neil Tabor

Callahan Jacobs Palmer Toy

Cassis Jamnick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Patterson Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Pestka Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vear

Daniels Johnson, Ruth Plakas Voorhees

Dennis Julian Pumford Waters

DeRossett Koetje Quarles Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Raczkowski Wojno

DeWeese Kooiman Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kowall Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kuipers Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to provide for payments to persons who served in the armed forces of the United States between June 27, 1950, and December 31, 1953, and to beneficiaries of such persons; to prescribe the power and duties of the state administrative board and state officers with respect thereto; to provide for acceptance of financial and other assistance from the federal government; to create the Korean veterans military pay fund in the state treasury; to make certain appropriations; and to prescribe penalties for violations of the provisions of this act,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 911, entitled

A bill to amend 1945 PA 72, entitled "An act to prevent the importation from other states, and the spread within this state, of all serious insect pests and contagious plant diseases and to provide for their repression and control, imposing certain powers and duties on the commissioner of agriculture; to prescribe penalties for the violation of the provisions of this act; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts," by amending section 5 (MCL 286.255).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 453 Yeas--105

Faunce

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 912, entitled

A bill to amend 1905 PA 311, entitled "An act with respect to the furnishing of bonds by state officers, their deputies, and officers of state institutions; to provide for the payment of the cost of such bonds, and to prescribe the places of filing the same," by amending sections 1 and 2 (MCL 15.71 to 15.72).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 454 Yeas--103

Adamini Frank Lemmons Rivet

Allen George Lipsey Rocca

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Basham Gilbert Mans Schermesser

Bernero Godchaux McConico Shackleton

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Sheltrown

Bisbee Hager Meyer Shulman

Bishop Hale Middaugh Spade

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stallworth

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Stamas

Bradstreet Hart Neumann Stewart

Brown, B. Howell Newell Switalski

Brown, C. Hummel O'Neil Tabor

Brown, R. Jacobs Palmer Toy

Callahan Jamnick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Patterson Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Pestka Vander Veen

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Plakas Voorhees

Dennis Julian Pumford Waters

DeRossett Koetje Quarles Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Raczkowski Wojno

DeWeese Kooiman Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kowall Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kuipers Richner Zelenko

Faunce LaSata Rison

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 913, entitled

A bill to amend 1846 RS 60, entitled "Of the superintendence and disposition of the public lands," by amending section 19 (MCL 322.319).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 455 Yeas--105

Faunce

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 915, entitled

A bill to amend 1933 PA 162, entitled "An act to provide for the levy of certain additional taxes in municipal school districts," by amending section 5 (MCL 211.255).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 456 Yeas--105

Faunce

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Patterson moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Reports of Select Committees

Second Conference Report

The Committee of Conference on the matters of difference between the two Houses concerning

House Bill No. 5763, entitled

A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled "Michigan employment security act," by amending sections 19, 20, 27, 29, 32, and 48 (MCL 421.19, 421.20, 421.27, 421.29, 421.32, and 421.48), section 19 as amended by 1996 PA 535, section 20 as amended by 1994 PA 162, section 27 as amended by 1995 PA 181, section 29 as amended by 1995 PA 25, section 32 as amended by 1996 PA 503, and section 48 as amended by 1983 PA 164, and by adding sections 13l and 32b.

Recommends:

First: That the House and Senate agree to the Substitute of the Senate as passed by the Senate and to the following amendments:

1. Amend page 8, line 25, after "then" by striking out the balance of the line through "otherwise" on line 26 and inserting "THE DIRECTOR WHO".

2. Amend page 9, line 2, by striking out "jointly and severally".

3. Amend page 9, line 4, after "THE" by striking out the balance of the line through "AGENCY" on line 5 and inserting "DIRECTOR".

4. Amend page 9, line 6, after "cover" by striking out "their" and inserting "HIS OR HER".

5. Amend page 43, line 8, after "fund" by striking out the balance of the line through "(C)(1)" on line 10.

6. Amend page 44, line 2, after "section 75" by striking out the balance of the line through "13l" on line 4.

7. Amend page 44, line 11, after "$300.00" by striking out the balance of the line through "$415.00." on line 22 and inserting "BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDATORY ACT THAT ADDED SECTION 13l AND $362.00 FOR CLAIMS FILED ON AND AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDATORY ACT THAT ADDED SECTION 13l. THE WEEKLY BENEFIT RATE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIMING BENEFITS ON AND AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDATORY ACT THAT ADDED SECTION 13l SHALL BE RECALCULATED SUBJECT TO THE $362.00 MAXIMUM WEEKLY BENEFIT RATE.".

8. Amend page 49, line 18, after "remuneration." by striking out "HOWEVER, BEFORE THE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS IN A BENEFIT YEAR, THE INDIVIDUAL MUST SERVE A NONCOMPENSABLE WEEK FOR THE FIRST OTHERWISE COMPENSABLE WEEK OF THE BENEFIT YEAR. THE NONCOMPENSABLE WEEK REQUIRED UNDER THE PRECEDING SENTENCE SHALL NOT INTERRUPT THE PAYMENT OF A WEEKLY BENEFIT RATE FOR CONSECUTIVE WEEKS OF UNEMPLOYMENT. AN ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE PAID HIS OR HER WEEKLY BENEFIT RATE WITH RESPECT TO THE WEEK FOR WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL RECEIVED CREDIT FOR A NONCOMPENSABLE WEEK WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL'S UNEMPLOYMENT IS TERMINATED BY THE INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTING FULL-TIME WORK WITH ANY EMPLOYER OR EMPLOYING UNIT OR WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IS NO LONGER ELIGIBLE FOR BENEFITS.".

9. Amend page 92, line 27, after "separation" by inserting "WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE SEPARATION".

10. Amend page 99, line 15, after "AND" by striking out "EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS SUBSECTION,".

11. Amend page 99, line 21, after "greater." by striking out the balance of the subsection.

Second: That the House and Senate agree to the title of the bill to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled "An act to protect the welfare of the people of this state through the establishment of an unemployment compensation fund, and to provide for the disbursement thereof; to create certain other funds; to create the Michigan employment security commission, and to prescribe its powers and duties; to provide for the protection of the people of this state from the hazards of unemployment; to levy and provide for contributions from employers; to provide for the collection of such contributions; to enter into reciprocal agreements and to cooperate with agencies of the United States and of other states charged with the administration of any unemployment insurance law; to furnish certain information to certain governmental agencies for use in administering public benefit and child support programs and investigating and prosecuting fraud; to provide for the payment of benefits; to provide for appeals from redeterminations, decisions and notices of assessments; and for referees and a board of review to hear and decide the issues arising from redeterminations, decisions and notices of assessment; to provide for the cooperation of this state and compliance with the provisions of the social security act and the Wagner-Peyser act passed by the Congress of the United States of America; to provide for the establishment and maintenance of free public employment offices; to provide for the transfer of funds; to make appropriations for carrying out the provisions of this act; to prescribe remedies and penalties for the violation of the provisions of this act; and to repeal all acts and parts of acts inconsistent with the provisions of this act," by amending sections 3, 4, 4a, 10, 19, 20, 27, 29, 32, 44, 48, 54, and 54c (MCL 421.3, 421.4, 421.4a, 421.10, 421.19, 421.20, 421.27, 421.29, 421.32, 421.44, 421.48, 421.54, and 421.54c), section 4 as amended by 1996 PA 498, section 10 as amended by 1989 PA 224, section 19 as amended by 1996 PA 535, sections 20 and 54 as amended by 1994 PA 162, section 27 as amended by 1995 PA 181, section 29 as amended by 1995 PA 25, section 32 as amended by 1996 PA 503, section 44 as amended by 1996 PA 504, section 48 as amended by 1983 PA 164, and section 54c as amended by 1993 PA 277, and by adding sections 5b, 13l, and 32b; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

Rick Johnson

Clark Bisbee

Samuel Buzz Thomas

Conferees for the House

Dan L. DeGrow

Joanne G. Emmons

John D. Cherry, Jr.

Conferees for the Senate

The Speaker announced that under Joint Rule 9 the second conference report would lie over one day.

Rep. Patterson moved pursuant to Joint Rule 9, that the Journal printing requirement be suspended, printed copies of the second conference report having been placed on the members' desks.

The motion prevailed.

The question being on the adoption of the second conference report,

The second conference report was then adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 457 Yeas--92

Adamini Frank LaSata Rivet

Allen George Lockwood Rocca

Anderson Gieleghem Mans Schauer

Basham Gilbert Mead Schermesser

Bernero Godchaux Meyer Shackleton

Birkholz Gosselin Middaugh Sheltrown

Bisbee Hager Minore Shulman

Bishop Hale Mortimer Spade

Bovin Hansen Neumann Stamas

Bradstreet Hart Newell Stewart

Brown, B. Howell O'Neil Switalski

Brown, C. Hummel Palmer Tabor

Brown, R. Jacobs Pappageorge Thomas

Callahan Jansen Patterson Toy

Cassis Jelinek Pestka Van Woerkom

Caul Johnson, Rick Plakas Vander Roest

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Pumford Vander Veen

DeRossett Julian Quarles Vear

DeVuyst Koetje Raczkowski Voorhees

DeWeese Kolb Reeves Williams

Drolet Kooiman Richardville Wojno

Ehardt Kowall Richner Woodward

Faunce Kuipers Rison Woronchak

Nays--13

Bogardus Hardman Lipsey Stallworth

Clark, I. Jamnick McConico Waters

Daniels Lemmons Phillips Zelenko

Dennis

In The Chair: Julian

Reps. Stallworth, Dennis, Waters, Daniels, McConico, Hardman, Bogardus, Phillips and Clark, having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on the second conference report for HB 5763 because the increase contained in this legislation will only help those unemployed persons that are receiving the maximum benefit. Over 100,000 current and many future unemployed persons in our state who are struggling to make ends meet will still receive no increase some 7 years after unemployment benefits were decreased. Furthermore, this legislation contains onerous provisions regarding how severance pay is treated. At the same time, this conference report increases business tax cuts and removes the threshold by which such cuts would be halted should the unemployment insurance fund become too depleted. This could put the fund in future jeopardy."

Rep. Lipsey, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

This bill, while falling short of the promised benefits, is even more flawed in that it shifts the burden of proof relating to employee discharges from the employer to the employee. This shift has the potential to affect unemployment benefits for generations to come. This time bomb will continue to explode long after the Dollars set forth in this bill have been increased to a reasonable level.

This bill also short changes those people who are the most vulnerable in our economy, our lowest paid employees. These are the people we should provide an extra measure of safety. Instead, we will leave these citizens further behind.

I cannot trade off modest monetary gains for the major structural burdens this legislation imposes. I believe the only moral choice is to vote 'NO' on the bill as presented."

Reps. Jamnick and Lemmons, having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

This bill is a broken promise for unemployed workers in Michigan. They were promised $415 in weekly benefits, and find themselves restricted to a maximum of $362.00 That is a cruel hoax. Current unemployment benefits are the lowest in the region.

Moreover, this bill does nothing for unemployed workers who are not eligible for the maximum benefit--about 40% of all unemployed workers: those with lower incomes and those most in need of some relief. They are the forgotten people in this process!

This bill adds onorous language that shifts the burden of proof in contested layoffs to the employee--from the employer. It adds language that penalizes workers who receive severance benefits.

Under the guise of an increase in worker benefits, this bill provides substantial relief to employers--on top of the $1.2 billion in savings they have accrued over the past few years. This employer relief comes at a time when the Unemployment Trust Fund has a substantial balance--a balance that will increase as new annual unemployment premiums are paid, and as the Fund stands to receive over $290 million in Federal funds. Further, it grants to employers significant advantages in language that may preclude benefit payments that are rightly deserved.

The bill insults workers in this state in a time of need. But it reserves the cruelest insult for those who most need assistance. There is some good in this bill. Some people will see a modest increase in benefits. On balance, however, the shortcomings in this bill outweigh the gains. For these reasons, I voted no."

______

Rep. Patterson moved that House Committees be given leave to meet during the balance of today's session.

The motion prevailed.

Reps. Murphy and Scranton entered the House Chambers.

The Speaker assumed the Chair.

Quorum Call

Rep. Patterson questioned the presence of a quorum and moved that the roll be called and printed in the Journal.

The motion prevailed.

The roll was called and the Clerk announced that a quorum was present.

The following is the roll call:

Roll Call No. 458 Yeas--97

Adamini Faunce Kuipers Richner

Allen Frank LaSata Rocca

Anderson George Lipsey Schauer

Basham Gieleghem Lockwood Schermesser

Bernero Gilbert McConico Scranton

Birkholz Godchaux Mead Shackleton

Bisbee Gosselin Meyer Sheltrown

Bishop Hager Middaugh Shulman

Bogardus Hale Minore Spade

Bovin Hansen Mortimer Stamas

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Stewart

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Callahan Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

Dennis Julian Plakas Waters

DeRossett Koetje Pumford Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Raczkowski Woodward

DeWeese Kooiman Reeves Woronchak

Drolet Kowall Richardville Zelenko

Ehardt

In The Chair: Johnson, Rick

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Motions and Resolutions

The Speaker, on behalf of the entire membership of the House of Representatives, offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 396.

A resolution of tribute offered as a memorial for Paul Porter.

Whereas, It is with great respect for the many ways in which he strengthened this state that we honor the memory of Paul Porter. As a leader in agriculture and community life and as a two-term lawmaker, Paul Porter displayed high standards of excellence in service and great sensitivity to the needs of others; and

Whereas, A native of Missouri, Paul Porter moved to Detroit and worked in the auto industry, where he became active in organized labor. This sense of activism and participation in civic groups remained with him during his long years of farming in Branch County. In the Quincy area, Mr. Porter was active with numerous farming groups, including several dairy associations. He was a strong advocate of 4-H, the Farm Union, and the Farm Bureau; and

Whereas, Known for his personal integrity and sense of fairness, Paul Porter devoted himself to numerous political groups. In 1974, he was elected to the Michigan House of Representatives as the first Democrat to represent the Branch-Hillsdale region in fifty years. During his two terms as a lawmaker, he distinguished himself through his leadership as the chair of the Agriculture Committee. His knowledge was important in the difficult days facing Michigan agriculture in the wake of the PBB accident; and

Whereas, The example of Paul Porter's devotion to his family, his community, and this state will long benefit the people of Michigan; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That we offer this expression of our highest tribute to honor the memory of Paul Porter, a member of this legislative body from 1975 to 1978; and be it further

Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the Porter family as evidence of our sincerest condolences.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted by unanimous standing vote.

Reports of Standing Committees

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. DeRossett, Chair of the Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 8:00 a.m.,

Present: Reps. DeRossett, Julian, Ehardt, Gilbert, Meyer, Van Woerkom, Sheltrown, Hansen, Spade,

Absent: Reps. Vear, Bogardus,

Excused: Reps. Vear, Bogardus.

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE REPORT

The following report, submitted by Rep. Kuipers, Chair of the Committee on Education, was received and read:

Meeting held on: Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 9:00 a.m.,

Present: Reps. Kuipers, Meyer, Allen, Bradstreet, Hager, Palmer, Van Woerkom, Voorhees, Hansen, Clark, McConico, Spade, Zelenko,

Absent: Reps. Hart, Ruth Johnson, Bogardus, Gieleghem,

Excused: Reps. Hart, Ruth Johnson, Bogardus, Gieleghem.

Introduction of Bills

Reps. Woodward, Raczkowski, Schauer, Hale, Schermesser, Bernero, Waters, Gieleghem, Spade, Kolb, Frank and Lemmons introduced

House Bill No. 5882, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled "The insurance code of 1956," by amending section 2110a (MCL 500.2110a), as added by 1996 PA 514.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Insurance and Financial Services.

Reps. Mead, Allen, Bisbee, Vear, Gilbert, Howell and Van Woerkom introduced

House Bill No. 5883, entitled

A bill to amend 1984 PA 431, entitled "The management and budget act," by amending section 237 (MCL 18.1237), as amended by 1999 PA 8, and by adding section 237b.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Reps. Richardville, Patterson, George, Pappageorge, Drolet, Gosselin, Woodward, Palmer, Bishop, Meyer, Woronchak, Kowall, Stewart, Vear, Faunce, Toy, Voorhees, Cassis, Switalski, Lemmons, Kolb, Schermesser, Birkholz and Thomas introduced

House Bill No. 5884, entitled

A bill to prohibit restrictions regarding local access to the broadcast of certain sports events; and to provide penalties.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Rep. Rocca introduced

House Bill No. 5885, entitled

A bill to amend 1965 PA 261, entitled "An act to authorize the creation and to prescribe the powers and duties of county and regional parks and recreation commissions; and to prescribe the powers and duties of county boards of commissioners with respect to county and regional parks and recreation commissions," by amending section 1 (MCL 46.351), as amended by 2000 PA 496.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Local Government and Urban Policy.

Reps. Bishop, Gosselin, Mead, Raczkowski, Richner, DeVuyst and Ruth Johnson introduced

House Bill No. 5886, entitled

A bill to amend 1991 PA 179, entitled "Michigan telecommunications act," by amending section 358 (MCL 484.2358), as added by 1995 PA 216.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Energy and Technology.

Rep. Mortimer introduced

House Bill No. 5887, entitled

A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled "Income tax act of 1967," (MCL 206.1 to 206.532) by adding section 269.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Tax Policy.

Reps. Julian, Vander Roest, Zelenko, Lockwood, Neumann, George and Richardville introduced

House Bill No. 5888, entitled

A bill to provide for the disposition of certain military artifacts; and to require compliance with federal law.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Veterans Affairs.

Reps. Julian, Vander Roest, Spade, Zelenko, Anderson, Lockwood, Neumann, George and Richardville introduced

House Bill No. 5889, entitled

A bill to amend 1955 PA 10, entitled "An act to provide for the registration of historic sites," by amending the title and sections 1 and 2 (MCL 399.151 and 399.152) and by adding sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Reps. Julian, Vander Roest, Spade, Zelenko, Lockwood, Toy, Voorhees, Neumann and Richardville introduced

House Bill No. 5890, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled "The Michigan penal code," by amending section 479 (MCL 750.479).

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

Reps. Julian, Cameron Brown, Vander Roest, Tabor, Hummel, Zelenko, Anderson, Lockwood, Neumann and Richardville introduced

House Bill No. 5891, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 295, entitled "Sex offenders registration act," by amending section 8 (MCL 28.728), as amended by 1999 PA 85, and by adding section 8c.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

Rep. Meyer introduced

House Bill No. 5892, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled "Natural resources and environmental protection act," (MCL 324.101 to 324.90106) by adding part 197.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Rep. Mead introduced

House Bill No. 5893, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled "Natural resources and environmental protection act," by amending section 5303 (MCL 324.5303), as amended by 2001 PA 221.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Announcement by the Clerk of Printing and Enrollment

The Clerk announced that the following bills had been printed and placed upon the files of the members, Thursday, April 11:

House Bill Nos. 5820 5821 5822 5823 5824 5825 5826 5827 5828 5829 5830 5831 5832 5833

5834 5835 5836 5837 5838 5839 5840 5841 5842 5843 5844 5845 5846 5847

5848 5849 5850 5851 5852 5853 5854 5855 5856 5857 5858 5859 5860 5861

5862 5863 5864 5865 5866 5867 5868 5869 5870 5871 5872 5873 5874 5875

5876 5877 5878 5879 5880 5881

The Clerk announced that the following Senate bills had been received on Thursday, April 11:

Senate Bill Nos. 420 425

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Messages from the Senate

House Bill No. 5516, entitled

A bill to amend 1999 PA 276, entitled "Banking code of 1999," (MCL 487.11101 to 487.15105) by adding section 4406.

The Senate has passed the bill by a 2/3 vote, ordered that it be given immediate effect and pursuant to Joint Rule 20, inserted the full title.

The House agreed to the full title.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

House Bill No. 5517, entitled

A bill to amend 1925 PA 285, entitled "An act to provide for the organization, operation, and supervision of credit unions; to provide for the conversion of a state credit union into a federal credit union or a credit union organized and supervised under the laws of any other state or territory of the United States or any other federally insured depository institution and for the conversion of a federal credit union or a credit union organized and supervised under the laws of any other state or territory of the United States or any other federally insured depository institution into a state credit union; and to provide for the merger of credit unions organized and supervised under the laws of this state, credit unions organized and supervised under the laws of any other state or territory of the United States, and federal credit unions," (MCL 490.1 to 490.31) by adding section 16c.

The Senate has passed the bill and ordered that it be given immediate effect.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

House Bill No. 5518, entitled

A bill to amend 1980 PA 307, entitled "Savings and loan act of 1980," (MCL 491.102 to 491.1202) by adding section 1135.

The Senate has passed the bill, ordered that it be given immediate effect and pursuant to Joint Rule 20, inserted the full title.

The House agreed to the full title.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

Senate Bill No. 420, entitled

A bill to amend 1968 PA 330, entitled "Private security business and security alarm act," by amending the title and section 17 (MCL 338.1067), as amended by 2000 PA 411, and by adding section 31a.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

Senate Bill No. 425, entitled

A bill to amend 1968 PA 330, entitled "Private security business and security alarm act," by amending sections 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 29, and 31 (MCL 338.1052, 338.1053, 338.1056, 338.1057, 338.1059, 338.1060, 338.1063, 338.1064, 338.1067, 338.1068, 338.1069, 338.1074, 338.1075, 338.1079, and 338.1081), sections 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 25, 29, and 31 as amended by 2000 PA 411.

The Senate has passed the bill.

The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

______

The Speaker called Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Ehardt to the Chair.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Reports of Select Committees

House Bill No. 5763, entitled

(For text of conference report, see today's journal p. 961.)

The Senate has adopted the report of the Committee of Conference and ordered that the bill be given immediate effect.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

First Conference Report

The Committee of Conference on the matters of difference between the two Houses concerning

Senate Bill No. 1107, entitled

A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled "The state school aid act of 1979," by amending sections 11, 11f, 11g, 19, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32d, 37, 38, 39, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 96, 98, 99, 107, 108, and 147 (MCL 388.1611, 388.1611f, 388.1611g, 388.1619, 388.1620, 388.1622a, 388.1622b, 388.1624, 388.1626a, 388.1631a, 388.1631d, 388.1632d, 388.1637, 388.1638, 388.1639, 388.1641, 388.1651a, 388.1651c, 388.1653a, 388.1654, 388.1656, 388.1657, 388.1661a, 388.1662, 388.1667, 388.1668, 388.1674, 388.1681, 388.1694, 388.1694a, 388.1696, 388.1698, 388.1699, 388.1707, 388.1708, and 388.1747), sections 11, 11f, 11g, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32d, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 98, 99, 107, and 147 as amended by 2001 PA 121 and sections 19, 37, 38, and 39 as amended and sections 96 and 108 as added by 2000 PA 297, and by adding sections 32i, 34, 39a, 51d, 55, 99a, and 121a; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

Recommends:

First: That the Senate and House agree to the Substitute of the House as passed by the House, amended to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled "The state school aid act of 1979," by amending sections 6, 11, 11f, 11g, 19, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 32f, 37, 38, 39, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 96, 98, 99, 101, 105, 107, 108, and 147 (MCL 388.1606, 388.1611, 388.1611f, 388.1611g, 388.1619, 388.1620, 388.1622a, 388.1622b, 388.1624, 388.1626a, 388.1631a, 388.1631d, 388.1632a, 388.1632b, 388.1632c, 388.1632d, 388.1632f, 388.1637, 388.1638, 388.1639, 388.1641, 388.1651a, 388.1651c, 388.1653a, 388.1654, 388.1656, 388.1657, 388.1661a, 388.1662, 388.1667, 388.1668, 388.1674, 388.1681, 388.1694, 388.1694a, 388.1696, 388.1698, 388.1699, 388.1701, 388.1705, 388.1707, 388.1708, and 388.1747), sections 6, 11, 11f, 11g, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 32f, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 98, 99, 107, and 147 as amended by 2001 PA 121 and sections 19, 37, 38, 39, 101, and 105 as amended and sections 96 and 108 as added by 2000 PA 297, and by adding sections 8b, 8c, 11j, 32i, 39a, 51d, 55, 99a, and 121a; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

Sec. 6. (1) "Center program" means a program operated by a district or intermediate district for special education pupils from several districts in programs for the autistically impaired, trainable mentally impaired, severely mentally impaired, severely multiply impaired, hearing impaired, physically and otherwise health impaired, and visually impaired. Programs for emotionally impaired pupils housed in buildings that do not serve regular education pupils also qualify. Unless otherwise approved by the department, a center program either shall serve all constituent districts within an intermediate district or shall serve several districts with less than 50% of the pupils residing in the operating district. In addition, special education center program pupils placed part-time in noncenter programs to comply with the least restrictive environment provisions of section 612 of part B of the individuals with disabilities education act, title VI of Public Law 91-230, 20 U.S.C. 1412, may be considered center program pupils for pupil accounting purposes for the time scheduled in either a center program or a noncenter program.

(2) "District pupil retention rate" means the proportion of pupils who have not dropped out of school in the immediately preceding school year and is equal to 1 minus the quotient of the number of pupils unaccounted for in the immediately preceding school year, as determined pursuant to subsection (3), divided by the pupils of the immediately preceding school year.

(3) "District pupil retention report" means a report of the number of pupils, excluding migrant and adult, in the district for the immediately preceding school year, adjusted for those pupils who have transferred into the district, transferred out of the district, transferred to alternative programs, and have graduated, to determine the number of pupils who are unaccounted for. The number of pupils unaccounted for shall be calculated as determined by the department.

(4) "Membership", except as otherwise provided in this act, means for a district, public school academy, university school, or intermediate district the sum of the product of .8 times the number of full-time equated pupils in grades K to 12 actually enrolled and in regular daily attendance on the pupil membership count day for the current school year, plus the product of .2 times the final audited count from the supplemental count day for the immediately preceding school year. All pupil counts used in this subsection are as determined by the department and calculated by adding the number of pupils registered for attendance plus pupils received by transfer and minus pupils lost as defined by rules promulgated by the superintendent, and as corrected by a subsequent department audit. The amount of the foundation allowance for a pupil in membership is determined under section 20. In making the calculation of membership, all of the following, as applicable, apply to determining the membership of a district, public school academy, university school, or intermediate district:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, and pursuant to subsection (6), a pupil shall be counted in membership in the pupil's educating district or districts. An individual pupil shall not be counted for more than a total of 1.0 full-time equated membership.

(b) If a pupil is educated in a district other than the pupil's district of residence, if the pupil is not being educated as part of a cooperative education program, if the pupil's district of residence does not give the educating district its approval to count the pupil in membership in the educating district, and if the pupil is not covered by an exception specified in subsection (6) to the requirement that the educating district must have the approval of the pupil's district of residence to count the pupil in membership, the pupil shall not be counted in membership in any district.

(c) A special education pupil educated by the intermediate district shall be counted in membership in the intermediate district.

(d) A pupil placed by a court or state agency in an on-grounds program of a juvenile detention facility, a child caring institution, or a mental health institution, or a pupil funded under section 53a, shall be counted in membership in the district or intermediate district approved by the department to operate the program.

(e) A pupil enrolled in the Michigan schools for the deaf and blind shall be counted in membership in the pupil's intermediate district of residence.

(f) A pupil enrolled in a vocational education program supported by a millage levied over an area larger than a single district or in an area vocational-technical education program established pursuant to section 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.690, shall be counted only in the pupil's district of residence.

(g) A pupil enrolled in a university school shall be counted in membership in the university school.

(h) A pupil enrolled in a public school academy shall be counted in membership in the public school academy.

(i) For a new district, university school, or public school academy beginning its operation after December 31, 1994, membership for the first 2 full or partial fiscal years of operation shall be determined as follows:

(i) If operations begin before the pupil membership count day for the fiscal year, membership is the average number of full-time equated pupils in grades K to 12 actually enrolled and in regular daily attendance on the pupil membership count day for the current school year and on the supplemental count day for the current school year, as determined by the department and calculated by adding the number of pupils registered for attendance on the pupil membership count day plus pupils received by transfer and minus pupils lost as defined by rules promulgated by the superintendent, and as corrected by a subsequent department audit, plus the final audited count from the supplemental count day for the current school year, and dividing that sum by 2.

(ii) If operations begin after the pupil membership count day for the fiscal year and not later than the supplemental count day for the fiscal year, membership is the final audited count of the number of full-time equated pupils in grades K to 12 actually enrolled and in regular daily attendance on the supplemental count day for the current school year.

(j) If a district is the authorizing body for a public school academy, then, in the first school year in which pupils are counted in membership on the pupil membership count day in the public school academy, the determination of the district's membership shall exclude from the district's pupil count for the immediately preceding supplemental count day any pupils who are counted in the public school academy on that first pupil membership count day who were also counted in the district on the immediately preceding supplemental count day.

(k) In a district, public school academy, university school, or intermediate district operating an extended school year program approved by the superintendent, a pupil enrolled, but not scheduled to be in regular daily attendance on a pupil membership count day, shall be counted.

(l) Pupils to be counted in membership shall be not less than 5 years of age on December 1 and less than 20 years of age on September 1 of the school year except a special education pupil who is enrolled and receiving instruction in a special education program approved by the department and not having a high school diploma who is less than 26 years of age as of September 1 of the current school year shall be counted in membership.

(m) An individual who has obtained a high school diploma shall not be counted in membership. An individual who has obtained a general education development (G.E.D.) certificate shall not be counted in membership. An individual participating in a job training program funded under former section 107a or a jobs program funded under former section 107b, administered by the Michigan strategic fund or the department of career development, or participating in any successor of either of those 2 programs, shall not be counted in membership.

(n) If a pupil counted in membership in a public school academy is also educated by a district or intermediate district as part of a cooperative education program, the pupil shall be counted in membership only in the public school academy, and the instructional time scheduled for the pupil in the district or intermediate district shall be included in the full-time equated membership determination under subdivision (q). However, for pupils receiving instruction in both a public school academy and in a district or intermediate district but not as a part of a cooperative education program, the following apply:

(i) If the public school academy provides instruction for at least 1/2 of the class hours specified in subdivision (q), the public school academy shall receive as its prorated share of the full-time equated membership for each of those pupils an amount equal to 1 times the product of the hours of instruction the public school academy provides divided by the number of hours specified in subdivision (q) for full-time equivalency, and the remainder of the full-time membership for each of those pupils shall be allocated to the district or intermediate district providing the remainder of the hours of instruction.

(ii) If the public school academy provides instruction for less than 1/2 of the class hours specified in subdivision (q), the district or intermediate district providing the remainder of the hours of instruction shall receive as its prorated share of the full-time equated membership for each of those pupils an amount equal to 1 times the product of the hours of instruction the district or intermediate district provides divided by the number of hours specified in subdivision (q) for full-time equivalency, and the remainder of the full-time membership for each of those pupils shall be allocated to the public school academy.

(o) An individual less than 16 years of age as of September 1 of the current school year who is being educated in an alternative education program shall not be counted in membership if there are also adult education participants being educated in the same program or classroom.

(p) The department shall give a uniform interpretation of full-time and part-time memberships.

(q) The number of class hours used to calculate full-time equated memberships shall be consistent with section 101(3). In determining full-time equated memberships for pupils who are enrolled in a postsecondary institution, a pupil shall not be considered to be less than a full-time equated pupil solely because of the effect of his or her postsecondary enrollment, including necessary travel time, on the number of class hours provided by the district to the pupil.

(r) Full-time equated memberships for pupils in kindergarten shall be determined by dividing the number of class hours scheduled and provided per year per kindergarten pupil by a number equal to 1/2 the number used for determining full-time equated memberships for pupils in grades 1 to 12.

(s) For a district, university school, or public school academy that has pupils enrolled in a grade level that was not offered by the district, university school, or public school academy in the immediately preceding school year, the number of pupils enrolled in that grade level to be counted in membership is the average of the number of those pupils enrolled and in regular daily attendance on the pupil membership count day and the supplemental count day of the current school year, as determined by the department. Membership shall be calculated by adding the number of pupils registered for attendance in that grade level on the pupil membership count day plus pupils received by transfer and minus pupils lost as defined by rules promulgated by the superintendent, and as corrected by subsequent department audit, plus the final audited count from the supplemental count day for the current school year, and dividing that sum by 2.

(t) A pupil enrolled in a cooperative education program may be counted in membership in the pupil's district of residence with the written approval of all parties to the cooperative agreement.

(u) If, as a result of a disciplinary action, a district determines through the district's alternative or disciplinary education program that the best instructional placement for a pupil is in the pupil's home, if that placement is authorized in writing by the district superintendent and district alternative or disciplinary education supervisor, and if the district provides appropriate instruction as described in this subdivision to the pupil at the pupil's home, the district may count the pupil in membership on a pro rata basis, with the proration based on the number of hours of instruction the district actually provides to the pupil divided by the number of hours specified in subdivision (q) for full-time equivalency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a district shall be considered to be providing appropriate instruction if all of the following are met:

(i) The district provides at least 2 nonconsecutive hours of instruction per week to the pupil at the pupil's home under the supervision of a certificated teacher.

(ii) The district provides instructional materials, resources, and supplies, except computers, that are comparable to those otherwise provided in the district's alternative education program.

(iii) Course content is comparable to that in the district's alternative education program.

(iv) Credit earned is awarded to the pupil and placed on the pupil's transcript.

(v) A pupil enrolled in an alternative or disciplinary education program described in section 25 shall be counted in membership in the district or public school academy that expelled the pupil.

(w) If a pupil was enrolled in a public school academy on the pupil membership count day, if the public school academy's contract with its authorizing body is revoked, and if the pupil enrolls in a district within 45 days after the pupil membership count day, the department shall adjust the district's pupil count for the pupil membership count day to include the pupil in the count.

(x) For a public school academy that has been in operation for at least 2 years and that suspended operations for at least 1 semester and is resuming operations, membership is the sum of the product of .8 times the number of full-time equated pupils in grades K to 12 actually enrolled and in regular daily attendance on the first pupil membership count day or supplemental count day, whichever is first, occurring after operations resume, plus the product of .2 times the final audited count from the most recent pupil membership count day or supplemental count day that occurred before suspending operations, as determined by the superintendent.

(y) For 2000-2001 only, if a district's membership for that fiscal year, as otherwise calculated under this subsection, would be less than 1,550 pupils, the district's membership for that fiscal year shall be considered to be the membership figure calculated under this subdivision. For 2001-2002 only, if a FOR DISTRICTS LOCATED IN THE LOWER PENINSULA ONLY, IF THE district's membership for ~~that~~ A PARTICULAR fiscal year, as otherwise calculated under this subsection, would be less than 1,550 pupils and the district has 4.5 or fewer pupils per square mile, as determined by the department, the district's membership shall be considered to be the membership figure calculated under this ~~subsection~~ SUBDIVISION. IF A DISTRICT EDUCATES AND COUNTS IN ITS MEMBERSHIP PUPILS IN GRADES 9 TO 12 WHO RESIDE IN A CONTIGUOUS DISTRICT THAT DOES NOT OPERATE GRADES 9 TO 12 AND IF 1 OR BOTH OF THE AFFECTED DISTRICTS REQUEST THE DEPARTMENT TO USE THE DETERMINATION ALLOWED UNDER THIS SENTENCE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE SQUARE MILEAGE OF BOTH DISTRICTS IN DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF PUPILS PER SQUARE MILE FOR EACH OF THE DISTRICTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION. The membership figure calculated under this ~~subsection~~ SUBDIVISION is the greater of the following:

(i) The average of the district's membership for the 3-fiscal-year period ending with that fiscal year, calculated by adding the district's actual membership for ~~that fiscal year~~ EACH OF THOSE 3 FISCAL YEARS, as otherwise calculated under this subsection, ~~plus the district's membership as calculated under this subdivision for each of the 2 immediately preceding fiscal years,~~ and dividing the sum of those 3 membership figures by 3.

(ii) The district's actual membership FOR THAT FISCAL YEAR as otherwise calculated under this subsection.

(Z) IF A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY THAT IS NOT IN ITS FIRST OR SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION CLOSES AT THE END OF A SCHOOL YEAR AND DOES NOT REOPEN FOR THE NEXT SCHOOL YEAR, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ADJUST THE MEMBERSHIP COUNT OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH A FORMER PUPIL OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY ENROLLS AND IS IN REGULAR DAILY ATTENDANCE FOR THE NEXT SCHOOL YEAR TO ENSURE THAT THE DISTRICT RECEIVES THE SAME AMOUNT OF MEMBERSHIP AID FOR THE PUPIL AS IF THE PUPIL WERE COUNTED IN THE DISTRICT ON THE SUPPLEMENTAL COUNT DAY OF THE PRECEDING SCHOOL YEAR.

(5) "Public school academy" means a public school academy or strict discipline academy operating under the revised school code.

(6) "Pupil" means a person in membership in a public school. A district must have the approval of the pupil's district of residence to count the pupil in membership, except approval by the pupil's district of residence shall not be required for any of the following:

(a) A nonpublic part-time pupil enrolled in grades 1 to 12 in accordance with section 166b.

(b) A pupil receiving 1/2 or less of his or her instruction in a district other than the pupil's district of residence.

(d) A pupil enrolled in a district other than the pupil's district of residence under an intermediate district schools of choice pilot program as described in section 91a or former section 91 if the intermediate district and its constituent districts have been exempted from section 105.

(e) A pupil enrolled in a district other than the pupil's district of residence but within the same intermediate district if the educating district enrolls nonresident pupils in accordance with section 105.

(f) A pupil enrolled in a district other than the pupil's district of residence if the pupil has been continuously enrolled in the educating district since a school year in which the pupil enrolled in the educating district under section 105 or 105c and in which the educating district enrolled nonresident pupils in accordance with section 105 or 105c.

(g) A pupil who has made an official written complaint or whose parent or legal guardian has made an official written complaint to law enforcement officials and to school officials of the pupil's district of residence that the pupil has been the victim of a criminal sexual assault or other serious assault, if the official complaint either indicates that the assault occurred at school or that the assault was committed by 1 or more other pupils enrolled in the school the pupil would otherwise attend in the district of residence or by an employee of the district of residence. A person who intentionally makes a false report of a crime to law enforcement officials for the purposes of this subdivision is subject to section 411a of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.411a, which provides criminal penalties for that conduct. As used in this subdivision:

(i) "At school" means in a classroom, elsewhere on school premises, on a school bus or other school-related vehicle, or at a school-sponsored activity or event whether or not it is held on school premises.

(ii) "Serious assault" means an act that constitutes a felony violation of chapter XI of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.81 to 750.90g, or that constitutes an assault and infliction of serious or aggravated injury under section 81a of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.81a.

(h) A pupil enrolled in a district located in a contiguous intermediate district, as described in section 105c, if the educating district enrolls those nonresident pupils in accordance with section 105c.

(i) A pupil whose district of residence changed after the pupil membership count day and before the supplemental count day and who continues to be enrolled on the supplemental count day as a nonresident in the district in which he or she was enrolled as a resident on the pupil membership count day of the same school year.

(j) A pupil enrolled in an alternative education program operated by a district other than his or her district of residence who meets 1 or more of the following:

(i) The pupil has been suspended or expelled from his or her district of residence for any reason, including, but not limited to, a suspension or expulsion under section 1310, 1311, or 1311a of the revised school code, MCL 380.1310, 380.1311, and 380.1311a.

(ii) The pupil had previously dropped out of school.

(iii) The pupil is pregnant or is a parent.

(iv) The pupil has been referred to the program by a court.

(k) A pupil enrolled in the Michigan virtual high school, for the pupil's enrollment in the Michigan virtual high school.

However, if a district that is not a first class district educates pupils who reside in a first class district and if the primary instructional site for those pupils is located within the boundaries of the first class district, the educating district must have the approval of the first class district to count those pupils in membership. As used in this subsection, "first class district" means a district organized as a school district of the first class under the revised school code.

(7) "Pupil membership count day" of a district or intermediate district means:

(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the fourth Wednesday in September each school year.

(b) For a district or intermediate district maintaining school during the entire school year, the following days:

(i) Fourth Wednesday in July.

(ii) Fourth Wednesday in September.

(iii) Second Wednesday in February.

(iv) Fourth Wednesday in April.

(8) "Pupils in grades K to 12 actually enrolled and in regular daily attendance" means pupils in grades K to 12 in attendance and receiving instruction in all classes for which they are enrolled on the pupil membership count day or the supplemental count day, as applicable. A pupil who is absent from any of the classes in which the pupil is enrolled on the pupil membership count day or supplemental count day and who does not attend each of those classes during the 10 consecutive school days immediately following the pupil membership count day or supplemental count day, except for a pupil who has been excused by the district, shall not be counted as 1.0 full-time equated membership. In addition, a pupil who is excused from attendance on the pupil membership count day or supplemental count day and who fails to attend each of the classes in which the pupil is enrolled within 30 calendar days after the pupil membership count day or supplemental count day shall not be counted as 1.0 full-time equated membership. Pupils not counted as 1.0 full-time equated membership due to an absence from a class shall be counted as a prorated membership for the classes the pupil attended. For purposes of this subsection, "class" means a period of time in 1 day when pupils and a certificated teacher or legally qualified substitute teacher are together and instruction is taking place.

(9) "Rule" means a rule promulgated pursuant to the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328.

(10) "The revised school code" means 1976 PA 451, MCL 380.1 to 380.1852.

(11) "School fiscal year" means a fiscal year that commences July 1 and continues through June 30.

(12) "State board" means the state board of education.

(13) "Superintendent", unless the context clearly refers to a district or intermediate district superintendent, means the superintendent of public instruction described in section 3 of article VIII of the state constitution of 1963.

(14) "Supplemental count day" means the day on which the supplemental pupil count is conducted under section 6a.

(15) "Tuition pupil" means a pupil of school age attending school in a district other than the pupil's district of residence for whom tuition may be charged. Tuition pupil does not include a pupil who is a special education pupil or a pupil described in subsection (6)(d) to (k). A pupil's district of residence shall not require a high school tuition pupil, as provided under section 111, to attend another school district after the pupil has been assigned to a school district.

(16) "State school aid fund" means the state school aid fund established in section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963.

(17) "Taxable value" means the taxable value of property as determined under section 27a of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.27a.

(18) "Total state aid" or "total state school aid" means the total combined amount of all funds due to a district, intermediate district, or other entity under all of the provisions of this act.

(19) "University school" means an instructional program operated by a public university under section 23 that meets the requirements of section 23.

SEC. 8B. (1) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ASSIGN A DISTRICT CODE TO EACH PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY THAT IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE AND IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE FUNDING UNDER THIS ACT.

(2) IF THE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT ASSIGN A DISTRICT CODE TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY MAY ASSIGN A TEMPORARY DISTRICT CODE TO THE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING PAYMENTS UNDER THIS ACT.

SEC. 8C. (1) NOT LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, 2002, AN INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT SHALL REPORT BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION UNDER THIS SECTION TO THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR, IN A FORM AND MANNER APPROVED BY THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ITS CONSTITUENT DISTRICTS. THIS INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE INFORMATION ON OWNERSHIP, CONSTRUCTION, OR OPERATION OF BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE WHETHER THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES ARE PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 307 OF THE MICHIGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT, 1991 PA 179, MCL 484.2307, OR THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES ARE BEYOND THOSE ALLOWED UNDER THAT SECTION.

(2) AS USED IN THIS SECTION:

(A) "BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE" MEANS ALL FACILITIES, HARDWARE, AND SOFTWARE AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE BROADBAND SERVICES IN THIS STATE.

(B) "BROADBAND SERVICES" MEANS THOSE SERVICES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VOICE, VIDEO, AND DATA, THAT PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR TRANSMISSION IN EXCESS OF 200 KILOBITS PER SECOND IN AT LEAST 1 DIRECTION REGARDLESS OF THE TECHNOLOGY OR MEDIUM USED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WIRELESS, COPPER WIRE, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, OR COAXIAL CABLE. IF VOICE TRANSMISSION CAPACITY IS OFFERED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER SERVICES UTILIZING TRANSMISSION IN EXCESS OF 200 KILOBITS PER SECOND, THE VOICE TRANSMISSION CAPACITY MAY BE LESS THAN 200 KILOBITS PER SECOND.

Sec. 11. (1) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, there is appropriated for the public schools of this state and certain other state purposes relating to education the sum of $10,306,721,500.00 from the state school aid fund established by section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and the sum of $385,613,500.00 from the general fund. For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, there is appropriated for the public schools of this state and certain other state purposes relating to education the sum of ~~$10,989,699,900.00~~ $10,990,148,200.00 from the state school aid fund established by section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and the sum of ~~$205,613,500.00~~ $198,413,500.00 from the general fund. For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, there is appropriated for the public schools of this state and certain other state purposes relating to education the sum of ~~$10,985,960,300.00~~ $11,240,941,400.00 from the state school aid fund established by section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 and the sum of ~~$420,613,500.00~~ $198,413,500.00 from the general fund. HOWEVER, IF LEGISLATION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $79,500,000.00 FROM THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ACT CONTINGENT FUND, PENALTIES AND INTEREST SUBACCOUNT, IS NOT ENACTED AND IN EFFECT ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 2002, THERE IS INSTEAD APPROPRIATED FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR 2002-2003 THE SUM OF $122,656,500.00. In addition, available federal funds are appropriated for each of those fiscal years.

(2) The appropriations under this section shall be allocated as provided in this act. Money appropriated under this section from the general fund and from available federal funds shall be expended to fund the purposes of this act before the expenditure of money appropriated under this section from the state school aid fund. If the maximum amount appropriated under this section from the state school aid fund for a fiscal year exceeds the amount necessary to fully fund allocations under this act from the state school aid fund, that excess amount shall not be expended in that state fiscal year and shall not lapse to the general fund, but instead shall remain in the state school aid fund.

(3) If the maximum amount appropriated under this section and section 11f from the state school aid fund for a fiscal year exceeds the amount available for expenditure from the state school aid fund for that fiscal year, payments under sections 11f, 11g, 22a, 31d, 51a(2), and 51c shall be made in full. ~~and~~ IN ADDITION, FOR DISTRICTS BEGINNING OPERATIONS AFTER 1994-95 THAT QUALIFY FOR PAYMENTS UNDER SECTION 22B, PAYMENTS UNDER SECTION 22B SHALL BE MADE SO THAT THE QUALIFYING DISTRICTS RECEIVE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE 1994-95 FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE DISTRICT BEGINNING OPERATIONS AFTER 1994-95 IS LOCATED. THE AMOUNT OF THE PAYMENT TO BE MADE UNDER SECTION 22B FOR THESE QUALIFYING DISTRICTS SHALL BE AS CALCULATED UNDER SECTION 22A, WITH THE BALANCE OF THE PAYMENT UNDER SECTION 22B BEING SUBJECT TO THE PRORATION OTHERWISE PROVIDED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION. STATE payments under each of the other sections of this act FROM ALL STATE FUNDING SOURCES shall be prorated on an equal percentage basis as necessary to reflect the amount available for expenditure from the state school aid fund for that fiscal year. However, if the department of treasury determines that proration will be required under this subsection, the department of treasury shall notify the state budget director, and the state budget director shall notify the legislature at least 30 calendar days or 6 legislative session days, whichever is more, before the department reduces any payments under this act because of the proration. During the 30 calendar day or 6 legislative session day period after that notification by the state budget director, the department shall not reduce any payments under this act because of proration under this subsection. The legislature may prevent proration from occurring by, within the 30 calendar day or 6 legislative session day period after that notification by the state budget director, enacting legislation appropriating additional funds from the general fund, countercyclical budget and economic stabilization fund, state school aid fund balance, or another source to fund the amount of the projected shortfall.

(4) Except for the allocation under section 26a, any general fund allocations under this act that are not expended by the end of the state fiscal year are transferred to the state school aid fund.

Sec. 11f. (1) In addition to any other money appropriated under this act, there is appropriated from the state school aid fund an amount not to exceed $32,000,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,~~ for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for each succeeding fiscal year through the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. Payments under this section will cease after September 30, 2008. These appropriations are for paying the amounts described in subsection (4) to districts and intermediate districts, other than those receiving a lump sum payment under subsection (2), that were not plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492 and that, on or before March 2, 1998, submitted to the state treasurer a board resolution waiving any right or interest the district or intermediate district has or may have in any claim or litigation based on or arising out of any claim or potential claim through September 30, 1997 that is or was similar to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan. The waiver resolution shall be in form and substance as required under subsection (8). The state treasurer is authorized to accept such a waiver resolution on behalf of this state. The amounts described in this subsection represent offers of settlement and compromise of any claim or claims that were or could have been asserted by these districts and intermediate districts, as described in this subsection.

(2) In addition to any other money appropriated under this act, there was appropriated from the state school aid fund an amount not to exceed $1,700,000.00 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999. This appropriation was for paying the amounts described in this subsection to districts and intermediate districts that were not plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan; that, on or before March 2, 1998, submitted to the state treasurer a board resolution waiving any right or interest the district or intermediate district had or may have had in any claim or litigation based on or arising out of any claim or potential claim through September 30, 1997 that is or was similar to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan; and for which the total amount listed in section 11h and paid under this section was less than $75,000.00. For a district or intermediate district qualifying for a payment under this subsection, the entire amount listed for the district or intermediate district in section 11h was paid in a lump sum on November 15, 1998 or on the next business day following that date. The amounts paid under this subsection represent offers of settlement and compromise of any claim or claims that were or could have been asserted by these districts and intermediate districts, as described in this subsection.

(3) This section does not create any obligation or liability of this state to any district or intermediate district that does not submit a waiver resolution described in this section. This section, any other provision of this act, and section 353e of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1353e, are not intended to admit liability or waive any defense that is or would be available to this state or its agencies, employees, or agents in any litigation or future litigation with a district or intermediate district.

(4) The amount paid each fiscal year to each district or intermediate district under subsection (1) shall be 1/20 of the total amount listed in section 11h for each listed district or intermediate district that qualifies for a payment under subsection (1). The amounts listed in section 11h and paid in part under this subsection and in a lump sum under subsection (2) are offers of settlement and compromise to each of these districts or intermediate districts to resolve, in their entirety, any claim or claims that these districts or intermediate districts may have asserted for violations of section 29 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963 through September 30, 1997, which claims are or were similar to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan. This section, any other provision of this act, and section 353e of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1353e, shall not be construed to constitute an admission of liability to the districts or intermediate districts listed in section 11h or a waiver of any defense that is or would have been available to the state or its agencies, employees, or agents in any litigation or future litigation with a district or intermediate district.

(5) The entire amount of each payment under subsection (1) each fiscal year shall be paid on November 15 of the applicable fiscal year or on the next business day following that date.

(6) Funds paid to a district or intermediate district under this section shall be used only for textbooks, electronic instructional material, software, technology, infrastructure or infrastructure improvements, school buses, school security, training for technology, or to pay debt service on voter-approved bonds issued by the district or intermediate district before the effective date of this section. For intermediate districts only, funds paid under this section may also be used for other nonrecurring instructional expenditures including, but not limited to, nonrecurring instructional expenditures for vocational education, or for debt service for acquisition of technology for academic support services. Funds received by an intermediate district under this section may be used for projects conducted for the benefit of its constituent districts at the discretion of the intermediate board. To the extent payments under this section are used by a district or intermediate district to pay debt service on debt payable from millage revenues, and to the extent permitted by law, the district or intermediate district may make a corresponding reduction in the number of mills levied for that debt service.

(7) The appropriations under this section are from the money appropriated and transferred to the state school aid fund from the countercyclical budget and economic stabilization fund under section 353e(2) and (3) of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1353e.

(8) The resolution to be adopted and submitted by a district or intermediate district under this section and section 11g shall read as follows:

"Whereas, the board of _______________________ (name of district or intermediate district) desires to settle and compromise, in their entirety, any claim or claims that the district (or intermediate district) has or had for violations of section 29 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, which claim or claims are or were similar to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492.

Whereas, the district (or intermediate district) agrees to settle and compromise these claims for the consideration described in sections 11f and 11g of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1611f and 388.1611g, and in the amount specified for the district (or intermediate district) in section 11h of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1611h.

Whereas, the board of __________________ (name of district or intermediate district) is authorized to adopt this resolution.

Now, therefore, be it resolved as follows:

1. The board of _______________________ (name of district or intermediate district) waives any right or interest it may have in any claim or potential claim through September 30, 1997 relating to the amount of funding the district or intermediate district is, or may have been, entitled to receive under the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1601 to 388.1772, or any other source of state funding, by reason of the application of section 29 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, which claims or potential claims are or were similar to the claims asserted by the plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492.

2. The board of _______________________ (name of district or intermediate district) directs its secretary to submit a certified copy of this resolution to the state treasurer no later than 5 p.m. eastern standard time on March 2, 1998, and agrees that it will not take any action to amend or rescind this resolution.

3. The board of _______________________ (name of district or intermediate district) expressly agrees and understands that, if it takes any action to amend or rescind this resolution, the state, its agencies, employees, and agents shall have available to them any privilege, immunity, and/or defense that would otherwise have been available had the claims or potential claims been actually litigated in any forum.

4. This resolution is contingent on continued payments by the state each fiscal year as determined under sections 11f and 11g of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1611f and 388.1611g. However, this resolution shall be an irrevocable waiver of any claim to amounts actually received by the school district or intermediate school district under sections 11f and 11g of the state school aid act of 1979.".

Sec. 11g. (1) From the general fund money appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $40,000,000.00 ~~for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,~~ for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for each succeeding fiscal year through the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013. Payments under this section will cease after September 30, 2013. These appropriations are for paying the amounts described in subsection (3) to districts and intermediate districts, other than those receiving a lump sum payment under section 11f(2), that were not plaintiffs in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492 and that, on or before March 2, 1998, submitted to the state treasurer a waiver resolution described in section 11f. The amounts paid under this section represent offers of settlement and compromise of any claim or claims that were or could have been asserted by these districts and intermediate districts, as described in this section.

(2) This section does not create any obligation or liability of this state to any district or intermediate district that does not submit a waiver resolution described in section 11f. This section, any other provision of this act, and section 353e of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1353e, are not intended to admit liability or waive any defense that is or would be available to this state or its agencies, employees, or agents in any litigation or future litigation with a district or intermediate district regarding these claims or potential claims.

(3) The amount paid each fiscal year to each district or intermediate district under this section shall be the sum of the following:

(a) 1/30 of the total amount listed in section 11h for the district or intermediate district.

(b) If the district or intermediate district borrows money and issues bonds under section 11i, an additional amount in each fiscal year calculated by the department of treasury that, when added to the amount described in subdivision (a), will cause the net present value as of November 15, 1998 of the total of the 15 annual payments made to the district or intermediate district under this section, discounted at a rate as determined by the state treasurer, to equal the amount of the bonds issued by that district or intermediate district under section 11i and that will result in the total payments made to all districts and intermediate districts in each fiscal year under this section being no more than the amount appropriated under this section in each fiscal year.

(4) The entire amount of each payment under this section each fiscal year shall be paid on May 15 of the applicable fiscal year or on the next business day following that date. If a district or intermediate district borrows money and issues bonds under section 11i, the district or intermediate district shall use funds received under this section to pay debt service on bonds issued under section 11i. If a district or intermediate district does not borrow money and issue bonds under section 11i, the district or intermediate district shall use funds received under this section only for the following purposes, in the following order of priority:

(a) First, to pay debt service on voter-approved bonds issued by the district or intermediate district before the effective date of this section.

(b) Second, to pay debt service on other limited tax obligations.

(c) Third, for deposit into a sinking fund established by the district or intermediate district under the revised school code.

(5) To the extent payments under this section are used by a district or intermediate district to pay debt service on debt payable from millage revenues, and to the extent permitted by law, the district or intermediate district may make a corresponding reduction in the number of mills levied for debt service.

(6) A district or intermediate district may pledge or assign payments under this section as security for bonds issued under section 11i, but shall not otherwise pledge or assign payments under this section.

SEC. 11J. FROM THE GENERAL FUND MONEY APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,674,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 ONLY, AND FROM DISTRICT AND INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT PAYMENTS TO THE SCHOOL LOAN BOND REDEMPTION FUND APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $700,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 ONLY, FOR PAYMENTS TO THE SCHOOL LOAN BOND REDEMPTION FUND IN THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY.

Sec. 19. (1) A district shall comply with the requirements of sections 1204a, 1277, 1278, and 1280 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1204a, 380.1277, 380.1278, and 380.1280, commonly referred to as "public act 25 of 1990".

(2) Each district and intermediate district shall provide to the department, in a form and manner prescribed by the department, information necessary for the development of an annual progress report on the implementation of sections 1204a, 1277, 1278, and 1280 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1204a, 380.1277, 380.1278, and 380.1280, commonly referred to as "public act 25 of 1990". ~~, and~~ ADDITIONALLY, EACH DISTRICT AND INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT SHALL PROVIDE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, IN A FORM AND MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, on the achievement of national education goals, and information necessary for the development of other performance reports.

(3) If a district or intermediate district fails to meet the requirements of subsection (2) and sections 1204a, 1277, and 1278 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1204a, 380.1277, AND 380.1278, ~~and 380.1280,~~ the department shall withhold 5% of the total funds for which the district or intermediate district qualifies under this act until the district or intermediate district complies with all of those sections. If the district or intermediate district does not comply with all of those sections by the end of the fiscal year, the department shall place the amount withheld in an escrow account until the district or intermediate district complies with all of those sections.

(4) If a school in a district is not accredited under section 1280 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1280, or is not making satisfactory progress toward meeting the standards for that accreditation, the department shall withhold 5% of the total funds for which the district qualifies under this act that are attributable to pupils attending that school. The department shall place the amount withheld from a district under this subsection in an escrow account and shall not release the funds to the district until the district submits to the department a plan for achieving accreditation for each of the district's schools that are not accredited under section 1280 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1280, or are not making satisfactory progress toward meeting the standards for that accreditation.

Sec. 20. (1) ~~For 2000-2001, the basic foundation allowance is $6,000.00 per membership pupil.~~ For 2001-2002, the basic foundation allowance is $6,300.00 per membership pupil. For 2002-2003, the basic foundation allowance is $6,700.00 per membership pupil.

(2) The amount of each district's foundation allowance shall be calculated as provided in this section, using a basic foundation allowance in the amount specified in subsection (1).

(3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amount of a district's foundation allowance shall be calculated as follows, using in all calculations the total amount of the district's foundation allowance as calculated before any proration:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, for a district that in the immediately preceding state fiscal year had a foundation allowance in an amount at least equal to the amount of the basic foundation allowance for the immediately preceding state fiscal year, the district shall receive a foundation allowance in an amount equal to the sum of the district's foundation allowance for the immediately preceding state fiscal year plus the dollar amount of the adjustment from the immediately preceding state fiscal year to the current state fiscal year in the basic foundation allowance. HOWEVER, FOR 2002-2003, THE FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR A DISTRICT UNDER THIS SUBDIVISION IS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR PLUS $200.00.

(b) For a district that in the 1994-95 state fiscal year had a foundation allowance greater than $6,500.00, the district's foundation allowance is an amount equal to the sum of the district's foundation allowance for the immediately preceding state fiscal year plus the lesser of the increase in the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year, as compared to the immediately preceding state fiscal year, or the product of the district's foundation allowance for the immediately preceding state fiscal year times the percentage increase in the United States consumer price index in the calendar year ending in the immediately preceding fiscal year as reported by the May revenue estimating conference conducted under section 367b of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1367b. FOR 2002-2003, FOR A DISTRICT THAT IN THE 1994-95 STATE FISCAL YEAR HAD A FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE GREATER THAN $6,500.00, THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE IS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR PLUS THE LESSER OF $200.00 OR THE PRODUCT OF THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR TIMES THE PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN THE UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRICE INDEX IN THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDING IN THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING FISCAL YEAR AS REPORTED BY THE MAY REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE CONDUCTED UNDER SECTION 367B OF THE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACT, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1367B.

(c) For a district that has a foundation allowance that is not a whole dollar amount, the district's foundation allowance shall be rounded up to the nearest whole dollar.

(d) Beginning in 2002-2003, for a district that receives a payment under section 22c for 2001-2002, the district's 2001-2002 foundation allowance shall be considered to have been an amount equal to the sum of the district's actual 2001-2002 foundation allowance as otherwise calculated under this section plus the per pupil amount of the district's equity payment for 2001-2002 under section 22c.

(4) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the state portion of a district's foundation allowance is an amount equal to the district's foundation allowance or $6,500.00, whichever is less, minus the difference between the product of the taxable value per membership pupil of all property in the district that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property times the lesser of 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993-94 and the quotient of the ad valorem property tax revenue of the district captured under 1975 PA 197, MCL 125.1651 to 125.1681, the tax increment finance authority act, 1980 PA 450, MCL 125.1801 to 125.1830, the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2151 to 125.2174, or the brownfield redevelopment financing act, 1996 PA 381, MCL 125.2651 to 125.2672, divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils. For a district described in subsection (3)(b), the state portion of the district's foundation allowance is an amount equal to $6,962.00 plus the difference between the district's foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and the district's foundation allowance for 1998-99, minus the difference between the product of the taxable value per membership pupil of all property in the district that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property times the lesser of 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993-94 and the quotient of the ad valorem property tax revenue of the district captured under 1975 PA 197, MCL 125.1651 to 125.1681, the tax increment finance authority act, 1980 PA 450, MCL 125.1801 to 125.1830, the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2151 to 125.2174, or the brownfield redevelopment financing act, 1996 PA 381, MCL 125.2651 to 125.2672, divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils. For a district that has a millage reduction required under section 31 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, the state portion of the district's foundation allowance shall be calculated as if that reduction did not occur. The $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(5) The allocation calculated under this section for a pupil shall be based on the foundation allowance of the pupil's district of residence. However, for a pupil enrolled pursuant to section 105 or 105c in a district other than the pupil's district of residence, the allocation calculated under this section shall be based on the lesser of the foundation allowance of the pupil's district of residence or the foundation allowance of the educating district. For a pupil in membership in a K-5, K-6, or K-8 district who is enrolled in another district in a grade not offered by the pupil's district of residence, the allocation calculated under this section shall be based on the foundation allowance of the educating district if the educating district's foundation allowance is greater than the foundation allowance of the pupil's district of residence. The calculation under this subsection shall take into account a district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2).

(6) Subject to subsection (7) and section ~~22b(4)~~ 22B(3) and except as otherwise provided in this subsection, for pupils in membership, other than special education pupils, in a public school academy or a university school, the allocation calculated under this section is an amount per membership pupil other than special education pupils in the public school academy or university school equal to the sum of the local school operating revenue per membership pupil other than special education pupils for the district in which the public school academy or university school is located and the state portion of that district's foundation allowance, or the sum of the basic foundation allowance under subsection (1) plus $500.00, whichever is less. However, beginning in 2002-2003, this $500.00 amount shall instead be $300.00. Notwithstanding section 101(2), for a public school academy that begins operations in ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , or 2002-2003, as applicable, after the pupil membership count day, the amount per membership pupil calculated under this subsection shall be adjusted by multiplying that amount per membership pupil by the number of hours of pupil instruction provided by the public school academy after it begins operations, as determined by the department, divided by the minimum number of hours of pupil instruction required under section ~~1284 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1284~~ 101(3). The result of this calculation shall not exceed the amount per membership pupil otherwise calculated under this subsection.

(7) If more than 25% of the pupils residing within a district are in membership in 1 or more public school academies located in the district, then the amount per membership pupil calculated under this section for a public school academy located in the district shall be reduced by an amount equal to the difference between the product of the taxable value per membership pupil of all property in the district that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property times the lesser of 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993-94 and the quotient of the ad valorem property tax revenue of the district captured under 1975 PA 197, MCL 125.1651 to 125.1681, the tax increment finance authority act, 1980 PA 450, MCL 125.1801 to 125.1830, the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2151 to 125.2174, or the brownfield redevelopment financing act, 1996 PA 381, MCL 125.2651 to 125.2672, divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils, in the school fiscal year ending in the current state fiscal year, calculated as if the resident pupils in membership in 1 or more public school academies located in the district were in membership in the district. In order to receive state school aid under this act, a district described in this subsection shall pay to the authorizing body that is the fiscal agent for a public school academy located in the district for forwarding to the public school academy an amount equal to that local school operating revenue per membership pupil for each resident pupil in membership other than special education pupils in the public school academy, as determined by the department.

(8) If a district does not receive an amount calculated under subsection (9); if the number of mills the district may levy on a homestead and qualified agricultural property under section 1211(1) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, is 0.5 mills or less; and if the district elects not to levy those mills, the district instead shall receive a separate supplemental amount calculated under this subsection in an amount equal to the amount the district would have received had it levied those mills, as determined by the department of treasury. A district shall not receive a separate supplemental amount calculated under this subsection for a fiscal year unless in the calendar year ending in the fiscal year the district levies 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993, whichever is less, on property that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property.

(9) For a district that had combined state and local revenue per membership pupil in the 1993-94 state fiscal year of more than $6,500.00 and that had fewer than 350 pupils in membership, if the district elects not to reduce the number of mills from which a homestead and qualified agricultural property are exempt and not to levy school operating taxes on a homestead and qualified agricultural property as provided in section 1211(1) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, and not to levy school operating taxes on all property as provided in section 1211(2) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, there is calculated under this subsection for 1994-95 and each succeeding fiscal year a separate supplemental amount in an amount equal to the amount the district would have received per membership pupil had it levied school operating taxes on a homestead and qualified agricultural property at the rate authorized for the district under section 1211(1) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, and levied school operating taxes on all property at the rate authorized for the district under section 1211(2) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, as determined by the department of treasury. If in the calendar year ending in the fiscal year a district does not levy 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993, whichever is less, on property that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property, the amount calculated under this subsection will be reduced by the same percentage as the millage actually levied compares to the 18 mills or the number of mills levied in 1993, whichever is less.

(10) For a district that is formed or reconfigured after June 1, ~~1994~~ 2002 by consolidation of 2 or more districts or by annexation, the resulting district's foundation allowance under this section beginning after the effective date of the consolidation or annexation shall be the average of the foundation allowances of each of the original or affected districts, calculated as provided in this section, weighted as to the percentage of pupils in total membership in the resulting district who reside in the geographic area of each of the original districts LESSER OF AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE HIGHEST FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE, AS CALCULATED UNDER THIS SECTION, AMONG THE ORIGINAL OR AFFECTED DISTRICTS PLUS $50.00 OR AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO $6,500.00 ADJUSTED BY THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BASIC FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE UNDER THIS SECTION FOR THE CURRENT STATE FISCAL YEAR AND $5,000.00. If an affected district's foundation allowance is less than the basic foundation allowance, the amount of that district's foundation allowance shall be considered for the purpose of calculations under this subsection to be equal to the amount of the basic foundation allowance. HOWEVER, BEGINNING IN 2002-2003, THE $6,500.00 AMOUNT PRESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE ADJUSTED EACH YEAR BY AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BASIC FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR THE CURRENT STATE FISCAL YEAR AND $5,000.00, MINUS $200.00.

(11) Each fraction used in making calculations under this section shall be rounded to the fourth decimal place and the dollar amount of an increase in the basic foundation allowance shall be rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

(12) State payments related to payment of the foundation allowance for a special education pupil are not calculated under this section but are instead calculated under section 51a.

(13) To assist the legislature in determining the basic foundation allowance for the subsequent state fiscal year, each revenue estimating conference conducted under section 367b of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1367b, shall calculate a pupil membership factor, a revenue adjustment factor, and an index as follows:

(a) The pupil membership factor shall be computed by dividing the estimated membership in the school year ending in the current state fiscal year, excluding intermediate district membership, by the estimated membership for the school year ending in the subsequent state fiscal year, excluding intermediate district membership. If a consensus membership factor is not determined at the revenue estimating conference, the principals of the revenue estimating conference shall report their estimates to the house and senate subcommittees responsible for school aid appropriations not later than 7 days after the conclusion of the revenue conference.

(b) The revenue adjustment factor shall be computed by dividing the sum of the estimated total state school aid fund revenue for the subsequent state fiscal year plus the estimated total state school aid fund revenue for the current state fiscal year, adjusted for any change in the rate or base of a tax the proceeds of which are deposited in that fund and excluding money transferred into that fund from the countercyclical budget and economic stabilization fund under section 353e of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1353e, by the sum of the estimated total school aid fund revenue for the current state fiscal year plus the estimated total state school aid fund revenue for the immediately preceding state fiscal year, adjusted for any change in the rate or base of a tax the proceeds of which are deposited in that fund. If a consensus revenue factor is not determined at the revenue estimating conference, the principals of the revenue estimating conference shall report their estimates to the house and senate subcommittees responsible for school aid appropriations not later than 7 days after the conclusion of the revenue conference.

(c) The index shall be calculated by multiplying the pupil membership factor by the revenue adjustment factor. If a consensus index is not determined at the revenue estimating conference, the principals of the revenue estimating conference shall report their estimates to the house and senate subcommittees responsible for school aid appropriations not later than 7 days after the conclusion of the revenue conference.

(14) If the principals at the revenue estimating conference reach a consensus on the index described in subsection (13)(c), the basic foundation allowance for the subsequent state fiscal year shall be at least the amount of that consensus index multiplied by the basic foundation allowance specified in subsection (1).

(15) If at the January revenue estimating conference it is estimated that pupil membership, excluding intermediate district membership, for the subsequent state fiscal year will be greater than 101% of the pupil membership, excluding intermediate district membership, for the current state fiscal year, then it is the intent of the legislature that the executive budget proposal for the school aid budget for the subsequent state fiscal year include a general fund/general purpose allocation sufficient to support the membership in excess of 101% of the current year pupil membership.

(16) For a district that had combined state and local revenue per membership pupil in the 1993-94 state fiscal year of more than $6,500.00, that had fewer than 7 pupils in membership in the 1993-94 state fiscal year, that has at least 1 child educated in the district in the current state fiscal year, and that levies the number of mills of school operating taxes authorized for the district under section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, a minimum amount of combined state and local revenue shall be calculated for the district as provided under this subsection. The minimum amount of combined state and local revenue for 1999-2000 shall be $67,000.00 plus the district's additional expenses to educate pupils in grades 9 to 12 educated in other districts as determined and allowed by the department. The minimum amount of combined state and local revenue under this subsection, before adding the additional expenses, shall increase each fiscal year by the same percentage increase as the percentage increase in the basic foundation allowance from the immediately preceding fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The state portion of the minimum amount of combined state and local revenue under this subsection shall be calculated by subtracting from the minimum amount of combined state and local revenue under this subsection the sum of the district's local school operating revenue and an amount equal to the product of the sum of the state portion of the district's foundation allowance plus the amount calculated under section 20j times the district's membership. As used in this subsection, "additional expenses" means the district's expenses for tuition or fees, not to exceed $6,500.00 as adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, plus a room and board stipend not to exceed $10.00 per school day for each pupil in grades 9 to 12 educated in another district, as approved by the department. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(17) For a district in which 7.75 mills levied in 1992 for school operating purposes in the 1992-93 school year were not renewed in 1993 for school operating purposes in the 1993-94 school year, the district's combined state and local revenue per membership pupil shall be recalculated as if that millage reduction did not occur and the district's foundation allowance shall be calculated as if its 1994-95 foundation allowance had been calculated using that recalculated 1993-94 combined state and local revenue per membership pupil as a base. A district is not entitled to any retroactive payments for fiscal years before 2000-2001 due to this subsection.

(18) FOR A DISTRICT IN WHICH AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE THAT ABATED TAXES ON PROPERTY WITH A STATE EQUALIZED VALUATION GREATER THAN THE TOTAL STATE EQUALIZED VALUATION OF THE DISTRICT AT THE TIME THE CERTIFICATE WAS ISSUED OR $700,000,000.00, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, WAS ISSUED UNDER 1974 PA 198, MCL 207.551 TO 207.572, BEFORE THE CALCULATION OF THE DISTRICT'S 1994-95 FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE, THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR 2002-2003 IS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR 2002-2003, AS OTHERWISE CALCULATED UNDER THIS SECTION, PLUS $250.00.

(19) FOR A DISTRICT THAT RECEIVED A GRANT UNDER FORMER SECTION 32E FOR 2001-2002, THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE FOR 2002-2003 SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO BE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE DISTRICT'S FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE, AS OTHERWISE CALCULATED UNDER THIS SECTION, PLUS THE QUOTIENT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE GRANT AWARD TO THE DISTRICT FOR 2001-2002 UNDER FORMER SECTION 32E DIVIDED BY THE DISTRICT'S MEMBERSHIP FOR 2001-2002. A DISTRICT QUALIFYING FOR A FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE ADJUSTMENT UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL USE THE FUNDS RESULTING FROM THIS ADJUSTMENT FOR PURPOSES ALLOWABLE UNDER FORMER SECTION 32E AS IN EFFECT FOR 2001-2002.

(20) ~~(18)~~ Payments to districts, university schools, or public school academies shall not be made under this section. Rather, the calculations under this section shall be used to determine the amount of state payments under section 22b.

(21) ~~(19)~~ If an amendment to section 2 of article VIII of the state constitution of 1963 allowing state aid to some or all nonpublic schools is approved by the voters of this state, each foundation allowance or per pupil payment calculation under this section may be reduced.

(22) ~~(20)~~ As used in this section:

(a) "Combined state and local revenue" means the aggregate of the district's state school aid received by or paid on behalf of the district under this section and the district's local school operating revenue.

(b) "Combined state and local revenue per membership pupil" means the district's combined state and local revenue divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils.

(d) "Homestead" means that term as defined in section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211.

(e) "Immediately preceding state fiscal year" means the state fiscal year immediately preceding the current state fiscal year.

(f) "Local school operating revenue" means school operating taxes levied under section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211.

(g) "Local school operating revenue per membership pupil" means a district's local school operating revenue divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils.

(h) "Membership" means the definition of that term under section 6 as in effect for the particular fiscal year for which a particular calculation is made.

(i) "Qualified agricultural property" means that term as defined in section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211.

(j) "School operating purposes" means the purposes included in the operation costs of the district as prescribed in sections 7 and 18.

(k) "School operating taxes" means local ad valorem property taxes levied under section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, and retained for school operating purposes.

(l) "Taxable value per membership pupil" means taxable value, as certified by the department of treasury, for the calendar year ending in the current state fiscal year divided by the district's membership excluding special education pupils for the school year ending in the current state fiscal year.

Sec. 22a. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $7,151,000,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed ~~$7,042,100,000.00~~ $7,022,000,000.00 for 2001-2002 , and an amount not to exceed ~~$6,956,000,000.00~~ $6,953,000,000.00 for 2002-2003 for payments to districts, qualifying university schools, and qualifying public school academies to guarantee each district, qualifying university school, and qualifying public school academy an amount equal to its 1994-95 total state and local per pupil revenue for school operating purposes under section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963. Pursuant to section 11 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, this guarantee does not apply to a district in a year in which the district levies a millage rate for school district operating purposes less than it levied in 1994. However, subsection (2) applies to calculating the payments under this section. Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated, as determined by the department, may be used to supplement the allocations under sections 22b and 51c in order to fully fund those calculated allocations for the same fiscal year.

(2) To ensure that a district receives an amount equal to the district's 1994-95 total state and local per pupil revenue for school operating purposes, there is allocated to each district a state portion of the district's 1994-95 foundation allowance in an amount calculated as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the state portion of a district's 1994-95 foundation allowance is an amount equal to the district's 1994-95 foundation allowance or $6,500.00, whichever is less, minus the difference between the product of the taxable value per membership pupil of all property in the district that is not a homestead or qualified agricultural property times the lesser of 18 mills or the number of mills of school operating taxes levied by the district in 1993-94 and the quotient of the ad valorem property tax revenue of the district captured under 1975 PA 197, MCL 125.1651 to 125.1681, the tax increment finance authority act, 1980 PA 450, MCL 125.1801 to 125.1830, the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2151 to 125.2174, or the brownfield redevelopment financing act, 1996 PA 381, MCL 125.2651 to 125.2672, divided by the district's membership. For a district that has a millage reduction required under section 31 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, the state portion of the district's foundation allowance shall be calculated as if that reduction did not occur.

(b) For a district that had a 1994-95 foundation allowance greater than $6,500.00, the state payment under this subsection shall be the sum of the amount calculated under subdivision (a) plus the amount calculated under this subdivision. The amount calculated under this subdivision shall be equal to the difference between the district's 1994-95 foundation allowance minus $6,500.00 and the current year hold harmless school operating taxes per pupil. If the result of the calculation under subdivision (a) is negative, the negative amount shall be an offset against any state payment calculated under this subdivision. If the result of a calculation under this subdivision is negative, there shall not be a state payment or a deduction under this subdivision. The taxable values per membership pupil used in the calculations under this subdivision are as adjusted by ad valorem property tax revenue captured under 1975 PA 197, MCL 125.1651 to 125.1681, the tax increment finance authority act, 1980 PA 450, MCL 125.1801 to 125.1830, the local development financing act, 1986 PA 281, MCL 125.2151 to 125.2174, or the brownfield redevelopment financing act, 1996 PA 381, MCL 125.2651 to 125.2672, divided by the district's membership.

(3) For pupils in membership in a qualifying public school academy or qualifying university school, there is allocated under this section each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 to the authorizing body that is the fiscal agent for the qualifying public school academy for forwarding to the qualifying public school academy, or to the board of the public university operating the qualifying university school, an amount equal to the 1994-95 per pupil payment to the qualifying public school academy or qualifying university school under section 20.

(4) A district, qualifying university school, or qualifying public school academy may use funds allocated under this section in conjunction with any federal funds for which the district, qualifying university school, or qualifying public school academy otherwise would be eligible.

(5) For a district that is formed or reconfigured after June 1, 2000 by consolidation of 2 or more districts or by annexation, the resulting district's 1994-95 foundation allowance under this section beginning after the effective date of the consolidation or annexation shall be the average of the 1994-95 foundation allowances of each of the original or affected districts, calculated as provided in this section, weighted as to the percentage of pupils in total membership in the resulting district in the state fiscal year in which the consolidation takes place who reside in the geographic area of each of the original districts. If an affected district's 1994-95 foundation allowance is less than the 1994-95 basic foundation allowance, the amount of that district's 1994-95 foundation allowance shall be considered for the purpose of calculations under this subsection to be equal to the amount of the 1994-95 basic foundation allowance.

(6) As used in this section:

(a) "1994-95 foundation allowance" means a district's 1994-95 foundation allowance calculated and certified by the department of treasury or the superintendent under former section 20a as enacted in 1993 PA 336 and as amended by 1994 PA 283.

(b) "Current state fiscal year" means the state fiscal year for which a particular calculation is made.

(c) "Current year hold harmless school operating taxes per pupil" means the per pupil revenue generated by multiplying a district's 1994-95 hold harmless millage by the district's current year taxable value per membership pupil.

(d) "Hold harmless millage" means, for a district with a 1994-95 foundation allowance greater than $6,500.00, the number of mills by which the exemption from the levy of school operating taxes on a homestead and qualified agricultural property could be reduced as provided in section 1211(1) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, and the number of mills of school operating taxes that could be levied on all property as provided in section 1211(2) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, as certified by the department of treasury for the 1994 tax year.

(e) "Homestead" means that term as defined in section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211.

(f) "Membership" means the definition of that term under section 6 as in effect for the particular fiscal year for which a particular calculation is made.

(g) "Qualified agricultural property" means that term as defined in section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211.

(h) "Qualifying public school academy" means a public school academy that was in operation in the 1994-95 school year and is in operation in the current state fiscal year.

(i) "Qualifying university school" means a university school that was in operation in the 1994-95 school year and is in operation in the current fiscal year.

(j) "School operating taxes" means local ad valorem property taxes levied under section 1211 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, and retained for school operating purposes.

(k) "Taxable value per membership pupil" means each of the following divided by the district's membership:

(i) For the number of mills by which the exemption from the levy of school operating taxes on a homestead and qualified agricultural property may be reduced as provided in section 1211(1) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, the taxable value of homestead and qualified agricultural property for the calendar year ending in the current state fiscal year.

(ii) For the number of mills of school operating taxes that may be levied on all property as provided in section 1211(2) of the revised school code, MCL 380.1211, the taxable value of all property for the calendar year ending in the current state fiscal year.

Sec. 22b. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $1,864,000,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed ~~$2,377,200,000.00~~ $2,368,000,000.00 for 2001-2002 , AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,865,000,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 for discretionary NONMANDATED payments to districts under this section. Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated, as determined by the department, may be used to supplement the allocations under sections 22a and 51c in order to fully fund those calculated allocations for the same fiscal year.

(2) Subject to subsection (3), SUBSECTIONS (5) TO (9), and section 11, ~~beginning in 2000-2001,~~ the allocation to a district under this section shall be an amount equal to the sum of the amounts calculated under sections 20, 20j, 51a(2), 51a(3), and 51a(12), minus the sum of the allocations to the district under sections 22a and 51c.

(3) In order to receive an allocation under this section, each district shall administer in each grade level that it operates in grades 1 to 5 a standardized assessment approved by the department of grade-appropriate basic educational skills. A district may use the Michigan literacy progress profile to satisfy this requirement for grades 1 to 3.

(4) From the allocation in subsection (1), the department ~~may~~ SHALL expend funds to pay for necessary costs associated with resolving matters pending in federal court impacting payments to districts, including, but not limited to, expert witness fees. BEGINNING IN 2001-2002, FROM THE ALLOCATION IN SUBSECTION (1), THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALSO PAY UP TO $1,000,000.00 IN LITIGATION COSTS INCURRED BY THIS STATE ASSOCIATED WITH LAWSUITS FILED BY 1 OR MORE DISTRICTS OR INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS AGAINST THIS STATE. IF THE ALLOCATION UNDER THIS SECTION IS INSUFFICIENT TO FULLY FUND ALL PAYMENTS REQUIRED UNDER THIS SECTION, THE PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE MADE IN FULL BEFORE ANY PRORATION OF REMAINING PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION.

(5) IT IS THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE THAT ALL CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THIS STATE HAVE BEEN FULLY FUNDED UNDER SECTIONS 22A, 31D, 51A, AND 51C. IF A CLAIM IS MADE BY AN ENTITY RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER THIS ACT THAT CHALLENGES THE LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THIS FUNDING OR ALLEGES THAT THERE EXISTS AN UNFUNDED CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT, THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR MAY ESCROW OR ALLOCATE FROM THE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR NONMANDATED PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION THE AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO SATISFY THE CLAIM BEFORE MAKING ANY PAYMENTS TO DISTRICTS UNDER SUBSECTION (2). IF FUNDS ARE ESCROWED, THE ESCROWED FUNDS ARE A WORK PROJECT APPROPRIATION AND THE FUNDS ARE CARRIED FORWARD INTO THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. THE PURPOSE OF THE WORK PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE FOR ANY PAYMENTS THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO DISTRICTS AS A RESULT OF LITIGATION. THE WORK PROJECT SHALL BE COMPLETED UPON RESOLUTION OF THE LITIGATION.

(6) IF THE LOCAL CLAIMS REVIEW BOARD OR A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION MAKES A FINAL DETERMINATION THAT THIS STATE IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 29 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION OF 1963 REGARDING STATE PAYMENTS TO DISTRICTS, THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR SHALL USE WORK PROJECT FUNDS UNDER SUBSECTION (5) OR ALLOCATE FROM THE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR NONMANDATED PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION THE AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO SATISFY THE AMOUNT OWED TO DISTRICTS BEFORE MAKING ANY PAYMENTS TO DISTRICTS UNDER SUBSECTION (2).

(7) IF A CLAIM IS MADE IN COURT THAT CHALLENGES THE LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF FUNDING FOR THIS STATE'S CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS OR ALLEGES THAT THERE EXISTS AN UNFUNDED CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT, ANY INTERESTED PARTY MAY SEEK AN EXPEDITED REVIEW OF THE CLAIM BY THE LOCAL CLAIMS REVIEW BOARD. IF THE CLAIM EXCEEDS $10,000,000.00, THIS STATE MAY REMOVE THE ACTION TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE COURT OF APPEALS SHALL HAVE AND SHALL EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER THE CLAIM.

(8) IF PAYMENTS RESULTING FROM A FINAL DETERMINATION BY THE LOCAL CLAIMS REVIEW BOARD OR A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION THAT THERE HAS BEEN A VIOLATION OF SECTION 29 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION OF 1963 EXCEED THE AMOUNT ALLOCATED FOR DISCRETIONARY NONMANDATED PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION, THE LEGISLATURE SHALL PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE FUNDING FOR THIS STATE'S CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS AT ITS NEXT LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

(9) IF A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING PAYMENTS MADE TO DISTRICTS RELATED TO COSTS REIMBURSED BY FEDERAL TITLE XIX MEDICAID FUNDS IS FILED AGAINST THIS STATE DURING 2001-2002 OR 2002-2003, 50% OF THE AMOUNT ALLOCATED IN SUBSECTION (1) NOT PREVIOUSLY PAID OUT FOR 2002-2003 AND EACH SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEAR IS A WORK PROJECT APPROPRIATION AND THE FUNDS ARE CARRIED FORWARD INTO THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. THE PURPOSE OF THE WORK PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE FOR ANY PAYMENTS THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO DISTRICTS AS A RESULT OF THE LITIGATION. THE WORK PROJECT SHALL BE COMPLETED UPON RESOLUTION OF THE LITIGATION. IN ADDITION, THIS STATE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE FUTURE FEDERAL TITLE XIX MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS TO DISTRICTS IF THE AMOUNT OR ALLOCATION OF REIMBURSED FUNDS IS CHALLENGED IN THE LAWSUIT. AS USED IN THIS SUBSECTION, "TITLE XIX" MEANS TITLE XIX OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, CHAPTER 531, 49 STAT. 620, 42 U.S.C. 1396 TO 1396r-6 AND 1396r-8 TO 1396v.

Sec. 24. (1) Subject to subsection (2), from the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to the educating district or intermediate district an amount equal to 100% of the added cost each fiscal year for educating all pupils assigned by a court or the family independence agency to reside in or to attend a juvenile detention facility or child caring institution licensed by the family independence agency or the department of consumer and industry services and approved by the department to provide an on-grounds education program. The total amount to be paid under this section for added cost shall not exceed ~~$7,900,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ $8,400,000.00 for 2001-2002 , AND $8,900,000.00 FOR 2002-2003. For the purposes of this section, "added cost" shall be computed by deducting all other revenue received under this act for pupils described in this section from total costs, as approved by the department, for educating those pupils in the on-grounds education program or in a program approved by the department that is located on property adjacent to a juvenile detention facility or child caring institution. Costs reimbursed by federal funds are not included.

(2) A district or intermediate district educating pupils described in this section at a residential child caring institution may operate, and receive funding under this section for, a department-approved on-grounds educational program for those pupils that is longer than 181 days, but not longer than 233 days, if the child caring institution was licensed as a child caring institution and offered in 1991-92 an on-grounds educational program that was longer than 181 days but not longer than 233 days and that was operated by a district or intermediate district.

(3) Special education pupils funded under section 53a shall not be funded under this section.

Sec. 26a. From the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~each fiscal year for 2000-2001, 2001-2002,~~ an amount not to exceed ~~$7,000,000.00~~ $8,800,000.00 FOR 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,174,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 to reimburse districts, intermediate districts, and the state school aid fund pursuant to section 12 of the Michigan renaissance zone act, 1996 PA 376, MCL 125.2692, for taxes levied in ~~2000,~~ 2001 , and 2002, respectively. This reimbursement shall be made by adjusting payments under section 22a to eligible districts, adjusting payments under section 56, 62, or 81 to eligible intermediate districts, and adjusting the state school aid fund. The adjustments shall be made not later than 60 days after the department of treasury certifies to the department and to the state budget director that the department of treasury has received all necessary information to properly determine the amounts due to each eligible recipient.

Sec. 31a. (1) From the state school aid fund money appropriated in section 11, there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $304,000,000.00,~~ for 2001-2002 an amount not to exceed $314,200,000.00 , AND THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $314,200,000.00 for payments to eligible districts and eligible public school academies under this section. Subject to subsection ~~(10)~~ (11), the amount of the additional allowance under this section shall be based on the number of actual pupils in membership in the district or public school academy who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the immediately preceding state fiscal year, as determined under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act, chapter 281, 60 Stat. 230, 42 U.S.C. 1751 to 1753, 1755 to 1761, 1762a, 1765 to 1766a, 1769, 1769b to 1769c, and 1769f to 1769h, and reported to the department by October 31 of the immediately preceding fiscal year and adjusted not later than December 31 of the immediately preceding fiscal year. However, for a public school academy that began operations as a public school academy after the pupil membership count day of the immediately preceding school year, the basis for the additional allowance under this section shall be the number of actual pupils in membership in the public school academy who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the current state fiscal year, as determined under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act.

(2) To be eligible to receive funding under this section, OTHER THAN FUNDING UNDER SUBSECTION (6), a district or public school academy that has not been previously determined to be eligible shall apply to the department, in a form and manner prescribed by the department, and a district or public school academy must meet all of the following:

(a) The sum of the district's or public school academy's combined state and local revenue per membership pupil in the current state fiscal year, as calculated under section 20, plus the amount of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2), is less than or equal to $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subdivision shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(b) The district or public school academy agrees to use the funding only for purposes allowed under this section and to comply with the program and accountability requirements under this section.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an eligible district or eligible public school academy shall receive under this section for each membership pupil in the district or public school academy who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk, as determined under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act and as reported to the department by October 31 of the immediately preceding fiscal year and adjusted not later than December 31 of the immediately preceding fiscal year, an amount per pupil equal to 11.5% of the sum of the district's foundation allowance or public school academy's per pupil ~~allocation~~ AMOUNT CALCULATED under section 20, plus the amount of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2), not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, or of the public school academy's per membership pupil ~~allocation~~ AMOUNT CALCULATED under section 20 for the current state fiscal year. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00. A public school academy that began operations as a public school academy after the pupil membership count day of the immediately preceding school year shall receive under this section for each membership pupil in the public school academy who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk, as determined under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act and as reported to the department by October 31 of the current fiscal year and adjusted not later than December 31 of the current fiscal year, an amount per pupil equal to 11.5% of the public school academy's per membership pupil ~~allocation~~ AMOUNT CALCULATED under section 20 for the current state fiscal year.

(4) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a district or public school academy receiving funding under this section shall use that money only to provide instructional programs and direct noninstructional services, including, but not limited to, medical or counseling services, for at-risk pupils; FOR SCHOOL HEALTH CLINICS; and for the purposes of subsection (5) OR (6), ~~or section 32e~~ and shall not use any of that money for administrative costs or to supplant another program or other funds, except for funds allocated to the district or public school academy under this section in the immediately preceding year and already being used by the district or public school academy for at-risk pupils. The instruction or direct noninstructional services provided under this section may be conducted before or after regular school hours or by adding extra school days to the school year and may be conducted using a tutorial method, with paraprofessionals working under the supervision of a certificated teacher. The ratio of pupils to paraprofessionals shall be between 10:1 and 15:1. Only 1 certificated teacher is required to supervise instruction using a tutorial method. As used in this subsection, "to supplant another program" means to take the place of a previously existing instructional program or direct noninstructional services funded from a funding source other than funding under this section.

(5) A district or public school academy that receives funds under this section and that operates a school breakfast program under section 1272a of the revised school code, MCL 380.1272a, shall use from the funds received under this section an amount, not to exceed $10.00 per pupil for whom the district or public school academy receives funds under this section, necessary to operate the school breakfast program.

(6) FROM THE FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SUBSECTION (1), THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2001-2002 AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,400,000.00 TO SUPPORT TEEN HEALTH CENTERS. THESE 2001-2002 FUNDS SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TO EXISTING TEEN HEALTH CENTERS IN A MANNER DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT IN COLLABORATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH. FROM THE FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SUBSECTION (1), THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,743,000.00 FOR COMPETITIVE GRANTS TO SUPPORT TEEN HEALTH CENTERS. THESE GRANTS FOR 2002-2003 SHALL BE AWARDED IN A FORM AND MANNER APPROVED JOINTLY BY THE DEPARTMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH. IF ANY FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION ARE NOT USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THEY ARE ALLOCATED, THOSE UNUSED FUNDS SHALL BE USED THAT FISCAL YEAR TO AVOID OR MINIMIZE ANY PRORATION THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (11) FOR THAT FISCAL YEAR.

(7) ~~(6)~~ Each district or public school academy receiving funds under this section shall submit to the department by July 15 of each fiscal year a report, not to exceed 10 pages, on the usage by the district or public school academy of funds under this section, which report shall include at least a brief description of each program conducted by the district or public school academy using funds under this section, the amount of funds under this section allocated to each of those programs, the number of at-risk pupils eligible for free or reduced price school lunch who were served by each of those programs, and the total number of at-risk pupils served by each of those programs. If a district or public school academy does not comply with this subsection, the department shall withhold an amount equal to the August payment due under this section until the district or public school academy complies with this subsection. If the district or public school academy does not comply with this subsection by the end of the state fiscal year, the withheld funds shall be forfeited to the school aid fund.

(8) ~~(7)~~ In order to receive funds under this section, a district or public school academy shall allow access for the department or the department's designee to audit all records related to the program for which it receives those funds. The district or public school academy shall reimburse the state for all disallowances found in the audit.

(9) ~~(8)~~ Subject to ~~subsection~~ SUBSECTIONS (5) AND (6), any district may use up to 100% of the funds it receives under this section to reduce the ratio of pupils to teachers in grades K-6, or any combination of those grades, in school buildings in which the percentage of pupils described in subsection (1) exceeds the district's aggregate percentage of those pupils. Subject to ~~subsection~~ SUBSECTIONS (5) AND (6), if a district obtains a waiver from the department, the district may use up to 100% of the funds it receives under this section to reduce the ratio of pupils to teachers in grades K-6, or any combination of those grades, in school buildings in which the percentage of pupils described in subsection (1) is at least 60% of the district's aggregate percentage of those pupils and at least 30% of the total number of pupils enrolled in the school building. To obtain a waiver, a district must apply to the department and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department that the class size reductions would be in the best interests of the district's at-risk pupils.

(10) ~~(9)~~ A district or public school academy may use funds received under this section for adult high school completion, general education development (G.E.D.) test preparation, or adult basic education programs described in section 107.

(11) ~~(10)~~ If necessary, and before any proration required under section 11, the department shall prorate payments under this section by reducing the amount of the per pupil payment under this section by a dollar amount calculated by determining the amount by which the amount necessary to fully fund the requirements of this section exceeds the maximum amount allocated under this section and then dividing that amount by the total statewide number of pupils who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the immediately preceding fiscal year, as described in subsection (1).

(12) FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION THAT ARE UNEXPENDED AND UNENCUMBERED AT THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR FOR WHICH THEY WERE ALLOCATED SHALL BE CARRIED FORWARD AND USED IN SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS TO AVOID OR MINIMIZE ANY PRORATION THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED UNDER SUBSECTION (11).

(13) ~~(11)~~ If a district is formed by consolidation after June 1, 1995, and if 1 or more of the original districts was not eligible before the consolidation for an additional allowance under this section, the amount of the additional allowance under this section for the consolidated district shall be based on the number of pupils described in subsection (1) enrolled in the consolidated district who reside in the territory of an original district that was eligible before the consolidation for an additional allowance under this section.

(14) ~~(12)~~ A district or public school academy that does not meet the eligibility requirement under subsection (2)(a) is eligible for funding under this section if at least 1/4 of the pupils in membership in the district or public school academy met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the immediately preceding state fiscal year, as determined and reported as described in subsection (1), and at least 4,500 of the pupils in membership in the district or public school academy met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the immediately preceding state fiscal year, as determined and reported as described in subsection (1). A district or public school academy that is eligible for funding under this section because the district meets the requirements of this subsection shall receive under this section for each membership pupil in the district or public school academy who met the income eligibility criteria for free breakfast, lunch, or milk in the immediately preceding fiscal year, as determined and reported as described in subsection (1), an amount per pupil equal to 5.75% FOR 2001-2002 AND 11.5% FOR 2002-2003 AND SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS of the sum of the district's foundation allowance or public school academy's per pupil allocation under section 20, plus the amount of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2), not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(15) ~~(13)~~ As used in this section, "at-risk pupil" means a pupil for whom the district has documentation that the pupil meets at least 2 of the following criteria: is a victim of child abuse or neglect; is below grade level in English language and communication skills or mathematics; is a pregnant teenager or teenage parent; is eligible for a federal free or reduced-price lunch subsidy; has atypical behavior or attendance patterns; or has a family history of school failure, incarceration, or substance abuse. For pupils for whom the results of at least the applicable Michigan education assessment program (MEAP) test have been received, at-risk pupil also includes a pupil who does not meet the other criteria under this subsection but who did not achieve at least a score of moderate on the most recent MEAP reading test for which results for the pupil have been received, did not achieve at least a score of moderate on the most recent MEAP mathematics test for which results for the pupil have been received, or did not achieve at least a score of novice on the most recent MEAP science test for which results for the pupil have been received. For pupils in grades K-3, at-risk pupil also includes a pupil who is at risk of not meeting the district's core academic curricular objectives in English language, communication skills, or mathematics.

Sec. 31d. (1) From the state school aid fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $14,149,400.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed ~~$15,039,400.00~~ $16,477,700.00 for 2001-2002 , and an amount not to exceed ~~$15,941,700.00~~ $17,337,200.00 for 2002-2003, and from the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $682,300.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $722,300.00 for 2001-2002 , and an amount not to exceed $762,800.00 for 2002-2003 for the purpose of making payments to districts, intermediate districts, and other eligible entities under this section.

(2) The amounts allocated FROM STATE SOURCES under this section shall be used to pay the amount necessary to reimburse districts for 6.0127% of the necessary costs of the state mandated portion of the school lunch programs provided by those districts. The amount due to each district under this section shall be computed by the department using the methods of calculation adopted by the Michigan supreme court in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492.

(3) The payments made under this section include all state payments made to districts so that each district receives at least 6.0127% of the necessary costs of operating the state mandated portion of the school lunch program in a fiscal year.

(4) FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 ALL AVAILABLE FEDERAL FUNDING, ESTIMATED AT $272,125,000.00, FOR THE NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM AND ALL AVAILABLE FEDERAL FUNDING, ESTIMATED AT $2,506,000.00, FOR THE EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

(5) ~~(4)~~ Notwithstanding section 17b, payments to intermediate districts and other eligible entities under this section shall be paid on a schedule determined by the department.

Sec. 32a. (1) From the state school aid fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $231,350,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $189,250,000.00 for 2001-2002 , and an amount not to exceed $72,600,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 to fund the all students achieve program (ASAP) as provided under sections 32b to 32h. In addition, from the general fund appropriations in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $21,250,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $2,200,100.00 for 2001-2002 , AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,200,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 for the purposes of sections 32b to ~~32h~~ 32F. The programs funded through this section are for the purposes of improving parenting skills, improving school readiness, reducing the number of pupils retained in grade, and reducing the number of pupils requiring special education services.

(2) Each grant recipient approved by the department shall implement department-approved data collection methods and evaluation or assessment tools to measure the impact of the proposed program.

(3) A district shall not use funds received under sections 32b to ~~32h~~ 32F to supplant any local or federal funds it currently receives. A district may use these funds in combination with other federal, local, public, or private funds to enhance existing programs with similar purposes.

Sec. 32b. (1) From the state school aid fund allocation in section 32a(1), there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $45,000,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $45,000,000.00 for 2001-2002 , and $0.00 for 2002-2003 for grants to intermediate districts and districts for programs for preschool children and their parents. The purpose of these programs is to improve school readiness and foster the maintenance of stable families by encouraging positive parenting skills; enhancing parent-child interaction; providing learning opportunities to promote intellectual, physical, and social growth; and promoting access to needed community services through a community-school-home partnership that provides parents with information on child development from birth to age 5.

(2) To qualify for funding under this section, a program shall meet all of the following:

(a) The program must provide services to all families with children age 5 or younger residing within the intermediate district or district who choose to participate, including at least all of the following services:

(i) Home visits by parent educators trained in child development to help parents understand appropriate expectations for each stage of their child's development, to encourage learning opportunities, and to promote strong parent-child relationships.

(ii) Group meetings of participating families.

(iii) Periodic developmental screening of the child's overall development, health, hearing, and vision.

(iv) A community resource network that provides referrals to other state, local, and private agencies as appropriate to assist parents in preparing their children for academic success and to foster the maintenance of stable families.

(v) Connection with quality preschool programs.

(b) The program must be a collaborative community effort that includes at least the intermediate district or district, local multipurpose collaborative bodies, local health and welfare agencies, and private nonprofit agencies involved in programs and services for preschool children and their parents.

(3) To compete for a grant under this section, an intermediate district or district shall apply to the superintendent not later than December 1, 2000 in the form and manner prescribed by the superintendent. To be considered for a grant under this section, a grant application must provide all of the following in a manner prescribed by the department:

(a) Provide a plan for the delivery of the program components described in subsection (2).

(b) Demonstrate an adequate collaboration of local entities involved in providing programs and services for preschool children and their parents.

(d) Provide a projected budget for the program to be funded. The intermediate district shall provide at least a 20% local match from local public or private resources for the funds received under this section. Not more than 1/2 of this matching requirement, up to a total of 10% of the total project budget, may be satisfied through in-kind services provided by participating providers of programs or services. In addition, not more than 10% of the grant may be used for program administration.

(4) Each successful grant recipient shall agree to include a data collection system and an evaluation tool approved by the department to measure the impact of the program on improving school readiness, reducing the number of children needing special education programs and services, and fostering the maintenance of stable families. The data collection system shall provide a report by October 15 of each year on the number of children in families with income below 200% of the federal poverty level that received services under this program and the total number of children who received services under this program.

(5) From the general fund allocation under section 32a(1), there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $250,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $100.00 for 2001-2002 , and $0.00 for 2002-2003 to the department, including the office for safe schools, for implementation and evaluation of activities under this section. Further, upon receipt of the federal drug-free schools grant, the department shall allocate $200,000.00 of that grant to the office for safe schools within the department.

(6) The department and superintendent shall do all of the following:

(a) The department shall make applications available for the purposes of this section not later than October 15, 2000.

(b) The superintendent shall approve or disapprove applications and notify the applying intermediate district or district of that decision not later than February 1, 2001. Priority in awarding grants shall be given to programs that focus on reducing the percentage of children needing special education programs and services when they enter school. The superintendent shall ensure that the intermediate districts and districts receiving grants under this section are geographically and economically diverse and that not more than 10% of the total allocation under this section is paid to any 1 particular intermediate district or district.

(c) The department shall ensure that all programs funded under this section utilize the most current validated research-based methods and curriculum for providing the program components described in subsection (2).

(d) The department shall submit a report to the legislature, the state budget director, and the senate and house fiscal agencies detailing the evaluations described in subsection (4) by December 1 of each year.

(7) An EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (8), AN intermediate district or district receiving funds under this section shall use the funds only for the program funded under this section. ~~Grants~~ SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (8), GRANTS awarded by February 1, 2001 may be used for the following school year.

(8) A DISTRICT OR INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER THIS SECTION MAY CARRY OVER ANY UNEXPENDED FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THIS SECTION TO SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS AND MAY EXPEND THOSE UNUSED FUNDS IN SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SECTION, FUNDS CARRIED OVER UNDER THIS SUBSECTION MAY BE USED TO FACILITATE PROGRAMS THAT ARE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR IN PURPOSE TO THOSE FUNDED UNDER THIS SECTION.

Sec. 32c. (1) From the general fund allocation in section 32a(1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $2,000,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001 and~~ for 2001-2002 ~~, and $0.00~~ AND for 2002-2003 , to the department for grants for community-based collaborative prevention services designed to foster positive parenting skills; improve parent/child interaction, especially for children 0-3 years of age; promote access to needed community services; increase local capacity to serve families at risk; improve school readiness; and support healthy family environments that discourage alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. The allocation under this section is to fund secondary prevention programs as defined by the children's trust fund for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

(2) The funds allocated under subsection (1) shall be distributed through a joint request for proposals process established by the department in conjunction with the children's trust fund and the state's interagency systems reform workgroup. Projects funded with grants awarded under this section shall meet all of the following:

(a) Be secondary prevention initiatives and voluntary to consumers. This appropriation is not intended to serve the needs of children for whom and families in which neglect or abuse has been substantiated.

(b) Demonstrate that the planned services are part of a community's integrated comprehensive family support strategy endorsed by the local multi-purpose collaborative body.

(c) Provide a 25% local match, of which not more than 10% may be in-kind services, unless this requirement is waived by the interagency systems reform workgroup.

(3) Notwithstanding section 17b, payments under this section may be made pursuant to an agreement with the department.

Sec. 32d. (1) From the state school aid fund allocation under section 32a(1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $72,600,000.00 ~~each fiscal year~~ for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002, AND FROM THE STATE SCHOOL AID FUND MONEY ALLOCATED UNDER SECTION 32A, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $72,600,000.00 FOR 2002-2003, for school readiness grants to enable eligible districts, as determined under section 37, to develop or expand, in conjunction with whatever federal funds may be available, including, but not limited to, federal funds under title I of the elementary and secondary education act of 1965, Public Law 89-10, 108 Stat. 3519, chapter 1 of title I of the Hawkins-Stafford elementary and secondary school improvement amendments of 1988, Public Law 89-10, 102 Stat. 140, and the head start act, subchapter B of chapter 8 of subtitle A of title VI of the omnibus budget reconciliation act of 1981, Public Law 97-35, comprehensive compensatory programs designed to improve the readiness and subsequent achievement of educationally disadvantaged children as defined by the department who will be at least 4, but less than 5 years of age, as of December 1 of the school year in which the programs are offered, and who show evidence of 2 or more risk factors as defined in the state board report entitled "children at risk" that was adopted by the state board on April 5, 1988. A comprehensive compensatory program funded under this section shall include an age-appropriate educational curriculum, nutritional services, health screening for participating children, a plan for parent and legal guardian involvement, and provision of referral services for families eligible for community social services. In addition, from the general fund allocations under section 32a(1), there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $16,250,000.00 for 2000-2001 for the purposes of subsections (2) and (3) and~~ an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 ~~each fiscal year~~ for 2001-2002 for the purposes of subsection (2), AND FROM THE GENERAL FUND MONEY ALLOCATED UNDER SECTION 32A, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (2).

(2) From the general fund allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 for a competitive grant to continue a longitudinal evaluation of children who have participated in the Michigan school readiness program.

(3) From the general fund allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $16,050,000.00 for 2000-2001 under this subsection to operate new or expanded full-day school readiness or head start programs. The funds shall be allocated through a competitive grant process to eligible districts that receive funding under subsection (1), to eligible public or nonprofit entities or agencies that receive funding for school readiness programs under the department appropriations act, or to eligible head start funded programs. The department shall determine the competitive grant criteria. The department may accept available federal funds from the family independence agency to support the program under this subsection. These federal funds include, but are not limited to, federal temporary assistance to needy families funds.

~~(4) A district, entity, or agency receiving funding under subsection (3) that offers head start or school readiness programs may use the funds to expand the program to operate a full day.~~

(5) A district, entity, or agency receiving funding under subsection (3) shall contribute a local match, which may consist of local, private, or federal funds or in-kind services, totaling at least 50% of the allocation under subsection (3).

(6) An application for a grant under subsection (3) shall be in the form and manner prescribed by the department. The department shall make the application form available to districts by December 15 of the school year. The application shall include a program budget that states all sources of funding to be used for the program. Applications shall be submitted to the department not later than February 1 of the school year. The department shall approve or disapprove the application and notify the applying district, entity, or agency of that decision by April 1 of the school year. Funds allocated under subsection (3) for the current fiscal year may be expended through the end of the following fiscal year.

(3) ~~(7)~~ A district receiving a grant under this section may contract for the provision of the comprehensive compensatory program ~~or full day school readiness program~~ and retain for administrative services an amount equal to not more than 5% of the grant amount.

(8) As used in this section, "full day" means a program that offers supplementary day care and therefore offers full-day programming of at least 10 hours per day as part of its school readiness program.

(9) Not more than 10% of the grant funding in this section may be used for start-up, equipment, or other costs not directly related to the costs of the program. This does not prohibit any applicant from receiving other available state assistance for these purposes.

(4) ~~(10)~~ A grant recipient receiving funds under this section shall report to the department no later than October 15 of each year the number of children participating in the program who meet the income or other eligibility criteria specified under section 37(3)(g) and the total number of children participating in the program. For children participating in the program who meet the income or other eligibility criteria specified under section 37(3)(g), grant recipients shall also report whether or not a parent is available to provide care based on employment status. For the purposes of this subsection, "employment status" shall be defined by the family independence agency in a manner consistent with maximizing the amount of spending that may be claimed for temporary assistance for needy families maintenance of effort purposes.

Sec. 32f. (1) From the state school aid fund allocation under section 32a(1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $57,500,000.00,~~ for 2001-2002 an amount not to exceed $45,000,000.00 , and for 2002-2003 $0.00, for grants under this section. From the general fund allocation under section 32a(1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $2,750,000.00 for the purposes of subsections (4) and (5), and there is allocated~~ each fiscal year for 2001-2002 and for 2002-2003 $0.00 for the purposes of subsection ~~(4)~~ (3).

(2) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $5,000,000.00,~~ for 2001-2002 an amount not to exceed $2,000,000.00 , and for 2002-2003 $0.00, for providing grants to the 8 regional literacy centers for the purposes of expanding training programs for trainers and teachers in the use of strategies for reading instruction and assessment, including the Michigan literacy progress profile.

(3) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $2,500,000.00 for competitive grants to higher education institutions for the development or enhancement of programs to meet the needs of autism impaired pupils. These programs may include, but are not limited to, student intervention centers on campus.

(3) ~~(4)~~ From the general fund allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated to the department ~~an amount not to exceed $2,500,000.00 for 2000-2001 and~~ $0.00 each fiscal year for 2001-2002 and for 2002-2003 for the development and dissemination of read, educate, and develop youth (READY) kits to parents of preschool and kindergarten children to provide these parents with information about how they can prepare their children for reading success.

(4) ~~(5)~~ From the general fund allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated to the department ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $250,000.00 and~~ each fiscal year for 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 $0.00 for the grant review process and grant administration under this section.

(5) ~~(6)~~ Except as otherwise provided in subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), to be eligible for a grant under this section, a district must have had at least 1,500 pupils in membership in 1998-99, and the number of pupils in the district that have been determined to have a specific learning disability according to R 340.1713 of the Michigan administrative code, as determined in the December 1, 1998 head count required under the individuals with disabilities education act, title VI of Public Law 91-230, must equal or exceed 5% of the district's membership. In addition, a district is eligible for a grant under this section if the district had at least 1,500 pupils in membership in 1998-99 and if not more than 41% of the district's pupils who took the spring 1999 fourth grade MEAP reading test achieved a score of at least satisfactory. Except as otherwise provided in subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), for a public school academy to be eligible for a grant under this section, the public school academy must be located in a district that is eligible under this subsection.

(6) ~~(7)~~ From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $50,000,000.00,~~ for 2001-2002 an amount not to exceed $43,000,000.00 , and for 2002-2003 $0.00, for competitive grants to eligible districts, to intermediate districts, and to public school academies located within eligible districts for reading improvements programs for pupils in grades K to 4, reading disorders and reading methods programs, mentoring programs, language and literacy outreach programs, or cognitive development programs. For 2001-2002, grants under this subsection shall be paid to grant recipients in the same proportion of the total allocation under this subsection as for 2000-2001. If the legislature enacts legislation authorizing the appropriation of federal funds for reading improvement programs for 2001-2002 or for 2002-2003, then it is the intent of the legislature that these funds be used to the extent possible for the purposes of this subsection. Federal funds received for reading improvement programs that can be used for substantially similar purposes as described under this section shall be first expended for the purposes of this subsection before funds appropriated from the state school aid fund allocated under this subsection, and the expenditure of funds under this subsection from the state school aid fund shall be reduced by an amount equal to the amount of the expenditure of federal funds under this subsection. If any conflict exists between federal reading program guidelines and this section, federal law will control.

(7) ~~(8)~~ Except as otherwise provided in subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), to qualify for funding under this section, a proposed reading improvement program must meet all of the following:

(a) The program shall include assessment of reading skills of pupils in grades K to 4 to identify those pupils who are reading below grade level and must provide special reading assistance for these pupils.

(b) The program shall be a research-based, validated, structured reading program.

(d) The program shall align learning resources to state standards.

(e) For each school building receiving funding under this section for a reading improvement program, the program shall serve at least 25% of pupils who are identified as at-risk, as determined by the Michigan literacy progress profile, of reading failure, and the amount of the grant shall not exceed $85,000.00 per school building annually.

(8) ~~(9)~~ Funds allocated for programs described in subsection ~~(8)~~ (7) may be used to reimburse grant recipients for funds paid by districts for up to 1/2 of the salaries and benefits for each teacher trained and certified to provide a reading improvement program.

(9) ~~(10)~~ Except as otherwise provided under subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), to qualify for funding under this section, a proposed mentoring program must be a research-based, validated program or a statewide 1-to-1 mentoring program to enhance the independence and life quality of pupils who are mentally impaired by providing opportunities for mentoring and integrated employment.

(10) ~~(11)~~ Except as otherwise provided under subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), to qualify for funding under this section, a proposed cognitive development program must be a research-based, validated educational service program, focused on assessing and building essential cognitive and perceptual learning abilities to strengthen pupil concentration and learning.

(11) ~~(12)~~ Except as otherwise provided under subsection ~~(18)~~ (17), to qualify for funding under this section, a proposed structured mentoring-tutorial reading program for preschool to grade 4 pupils must be a research-based, validated program that develops individualized instructional plans based on each pupil's age, assessed needs, reading level, interests, and learning style.

(12) ~~(13)~~ A program receiving funding under this section may be conducted outside of regular school hours or outside the regular school calendar.

(13) ~~(14)~~ To compete for a grant under this section, an applicant shall apply to the superintendent in the form and manner prescribed by the superintendent. The department shall make applications available for this purpose. An applicant shall include in its application a projected budget for the programs. The grant recipient shall provide at least a 20% local match from local public or private resources for the funds received under this section. Not more than 1/2 of this matching requirement, up to a total of 10% of the total project budget, may be satisfied through in-kind services provided by participating providers of programs or services. In addition, not more than 10% of the grant may be used for program administration.

(14) ~~(15)~~ The superintendent shall approve or disapprove applications and notify the applicant of that decision. Priority in awarding grants shall be given to programs that focus on accelerating student achievement on a cost-effective basis, reducing the number of pupils requiring special education programs and services, and improving pupil scores on standardized tests and assessments.

(15) ~~(16)~~ A grant recipient receiving funds under this section shall report to the department, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, on the results achieved by the program. At a minimum, the grant recipient shall report to the department by October 15 regarding the program's impact on reducing the number of pupils requiring special education programs and services and on improving pupil scores on standardized tests and assessments, and information on the costs and benefits per unit of pupil improvement. In addition, the report shall state the number of pupils eligible for free or reduced price school lunch who received services under the program and the total number of pupils who received services under the program. Not later than November 15 of each fiscal year, the department shall submit a report to the legislature, the state budget director, and the senate and house fiscal agencies detailing the results of the programs. It is the intent of the legislature that further funding for the programs under this section will reflect the results achieved in these programs.

(16) ~~(17)~~ Notwithstanding section 17b, payments under this section shall be paid on a schedule determined by the department.

(17) ~~(18)~~ For a district or public school academy awarded a grant under former section 32, the determination of whether the district or public school academy is eligible for a grant under this section may be made according to the eligibility standards in effect under former section 32. Further, the district or public school academy may continue to use the grant proceeds for any use permissible under this section or former section 32 as in effect at the time the district or public school academy was awarded the grant.

(18) ~~(19)~~ If the maximum amount appropriated under this section exceeds the amount necessary to fully fund allocations under this section, that excess amount shall not be expended in that state fiscal year but shall instead be carried forward to the succeeding fiscal year and added to any funds appropriated for that fiscal year for expenditure in that fiscal year.

(19) ~~(20)~~ A district that received funding for 1999-2000 under former section 32 shall receive funding under this section for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002. ~~, and 2002-2003.~~

(20) A DISTRICT OR INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER THIS SECTION MAY CARRY OVER ANY UNEXPENDED FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THIS SECTION TO SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS AND MAY EXPEND THOSE UNUSED FUNDS IN SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS.

SEC. 32I. IF IT IS DETERMINED AT THE MAY 2002 REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE CONDUCTED UNDER SECTION 367B OF THE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACT, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1367B, THAT THERE IS ADDITIONAL SCHOOL AID FUND REVENUE BEYOND THAT DETERMINED AT THE JANUARY 2002 REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE, THEN IT IS THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE TO ENACT LEGISLATION TO FUND, TO THE EXTENT THAT REVENUES ARE AVAILABLE, THE SAME PROGRAMS THAT WERE FUNDED UNDER SECTIONS 32B, 32F(2), AND 32F(7) IN 2001-2002 AND UNDER SECTION 32D(3) IN 2000-2001.

Sec. 37. (1) A district is eligible for an allocation under ~~section 36 or, beginning in 2000-2001,~~ section 32d , if the district meets all of the requirements in subsections (2), (3), and (4).

(2) The district shall submit a preapplication, in a manner and on forms prescribed by the department, by a date specified by the department in the immediately preceding state fiscal year. The preapplication shall include a comprehensive needs assessment and community collaboration plan, and shall identify all of the following:

(a) The estimated total number of children in the community who meet the criteria of section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D and how that calculation was made.

(b) The estimated number of children in the community who meet the criteria of section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D and are being served by other early childhood development programs operating in the community, and how that calculation was made.

(c) The number of children the district will be able to serve who meet the criteria of section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D including a verification of physical facility and staff resources capacity.

(d) The estimated number of children who meet the criteria of section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D who will remain unserved after the district and community early childhood programs have met their funded enrollments. The school district shall maintain a waiting list of identified unserved eligible children who would be served when openings are available.

(3) The district shall submit a final application for approval, in a manner and on forms prescribed by the department, by a date specified by the department. The final application shall indicate all of the following that apply:

(a) The district complies with the state board approved standards of quality and curriculum guidelines for early childhood programs for 4-year-olds.

(b) The district provides for the active and continuous participation of parents or guardians of the children in the program, and describes the district's participation plan as part of the application.

(i) Teachers possessing proper training, including, but not limited to, a valid teaching certificate and an early childhood (ZA) endorsement. This provision does not apply to a district that subcontracts with an eligible child development program. In that situation a teacher must have a valid teaching certificate and may have a child development associate credential (CDA) instead of an early childhood (ZA) endorsement.

(ii) Paraprofessionals possessing proper training in early childhood development or who have completed at least 1 course in an appropriate training program, including, but not limited to, a child development associate credential (CDA) or associate degree in child development or other similar program, as approved by the department.

(d) The district has submitted for approval a program budget that includes only those costs not reimbursed or reimbursable by federal funding, that are clearly and directly attributable to the early childhood readiness program, and that would not be incurred if the program were not being offered. If children other than those determined to be educationally disadvantaged participate in the program, state reimbursement under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, under section~~ 32d shall be limited to the portion of approved costs attributable to educationally disadvantaged children.

(e) The district has established a school readiness advisory committee consisting of, at a minimum, classroom teachers for prekindergarten, kindergarten, and first grade; parents or guardians of program participants; representatives from appropriate community agencies and organizations; the district curriculum director or equivalent administrator; and, if feasible, a school psychologist, school social worker, or school counselor. In addition, there shall be on the committee at least 1 parent or guardian of a program participant for every 18 children enrolled in the program, with a minimum of 2 parent or guardian representatives. The committee shall do all of the following:

(i) Ensure the ongoing articulation of the early childhood, kindergarten, and first grade programs offered by the district.

(ii) Review the mechanisms and criteria used to determine participation in the early childhood program.

(iii) Review the health screening program for all participants.

(iv) Review the nutritional services provided to program participants.

(v) Review the mechanisms in place for the referral of families to community social service agencies, as appropriate.

(vi) Review the collaboration with and the involvement of appropriate community, volunteer, and social service agencies and organizations in addressing all aspects of educational disadvantage.

(vii) Review, evaluate, and make recommendations to a local school readiness program or programs for changes to the school readiness program.

(f) The district has submitted for departmental approval a plan to conduct and report annual school readiness program evaluations using criteria approved by the department. At a minimum, the evaluations shall include assessment of the gains in educational readiness and progress through first grade of children participating in the school readiness program.

(g) More than 50% of the children participating in the program meet the income eligibility criteria for free or reduced price lunch, as determined under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act, chapter 281, 60 Stat. 230, 42 U.S.C. 1751 to 1753, 1755 to 1761, 1762a, 1765 to 1766a, 1769, 1769b to 1769c, and 1769f to 1769h, or meet the income and all other eligibility criteria for the family independence agency unified child day care program.

(4) A consortium of 2 or more districts shall be eligible for an allocation under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D if the districts designate a single fiscal agent for the allocation. A district or intermediate district may administer a consortium described in this subsection. A consortium shall submit a single preapplication and application for the children to be served, regardless of the number of districts participating in the consortium.

(5) With the final application, an applicant district shall submit to the department a resolution adopted by its board certifying the number of 4-year-old children who show evidence of risk factors as described in section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section 32d,~~ 32D who meet the income eligibility criteria for free or reduced price lunch or the income and all other eligibility criteria for the family independence agency unified child day care program, and who will participate in a school readiness program funded under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section~~ 32d.

Sec. 38. The maximum number of prekindergarten children construed to be in need of special readiness assistance under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section~~ 32d shall be calculated for each district in the following manner: one-half of the percentage of the district's pupils in grades 1-5 who are eligible for free lunch, as determined by the district's October count in the immediately preceding school year under the Richard B. Russell national school lunch act, chapter 281, 60 Stat. 230, 42 U.S.C. 1751 to 1753, 1755 to 1761, 1762a, 1765 to 1766a, 1769, 1769b to 1769c, and 1769f to 1769h, as reported to the department not later than December 31 of the immediately preceding fiscal year, shall be multiplied by the average kindergarten enrollment of the district on the pupil membership count day of the 2 immediately preceding years.

Sec. 39. (1) The tentative allocation for each fiscal year to each eligible district under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section~~ 32d shall be determined by multiplying the number of children determined in section 38 or the number of children the district indicates it will be able to serve under section 37(2)(c), whichever is less, ~~by $3,100.00 or, beginning in 2000-2001,~~ by $3,300.00 and shall be distributed among districts in decreasing order of concentration of eligible children as determined by section 38 until the money allocated in section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section~~ 32d is distributed.

(2) A district that has not less than 50 eligible children shall receive priority over other eligible districts other than those districts funded under subsection (3).

(3) A district that received funds under this section in at least 1 of the 2 immediately preceding fiscal years shall receive priority in funding over other eligible districts. However, funding beyond 3 state fiscal years is contingent upon the availability of funds and documented evidence satisfactory to the department of compliance with all operational, fiscal, administrative, and other program requirements.

(4) A district that offers supplementary day care funded by funds other than those received under this section and therefore offers full-day programs as part of its early childhood development program shall receive priority in the allocation of funds under this section over other eligible districts other than those districts funded under subsection (3).

(5) For any district with 315 or more eligible pupils, the number of eligible pupils shall be 65% of the number calculated under section 38. However, none of these districts may have less than 315 pupils for purposes of calculating the tentative allocation under section ~~36 or, beginning in 2000-2001, section~~ 32d.

(6) If, taking into account the total amount to be allocated to the district as calculated under this section, a district determines that it is able to include additional eligible children in the school readiness program without additional funds under this section, the district may include additional eligible children but shall not receive additional funding under this section for those children.

SEC. 39A. (1) FROM THE APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 TO DISTRICTS, INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE ENTITIES ALL AVAILABLE FEDERAL FUNDING, ESTIMATED AT $634,919,400.00, FOR THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001, PUBLIC LAW 107-110, 115 STAT. 1425. THESE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS:

(A) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,666,300.00 FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANTS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT FUNDS.

(B) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $15,520,100.00 TO PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH DRUG- AND VIOLENCE-PREVENTION PROGRAMS AND TO IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE SCHOOL SAFETY, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FUNDS.

(C) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $22,572,000.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING TEACHING AND LEARNING THROUGH A MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY STATE GRANT FUNDS.

(D) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $104,568,800.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREPARING, TRAINING, AND RECRUITING HIGH-QUALITY TEACHERS AND CLASS SIZE REDUCTION, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FUNDS.

(E) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $4,647,700.00 FOR PROGRAMS TO TEACH ENGLISH TO LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT (LEP) CHILDREN, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION STATE GRANT FUNDS.

(F) AN AMOUNT ESTABLISHED AT $8,550,000.00 FOR THE MICHIGAN CHARTER SCHOOL SUBGRANT PROGRAM, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, CHARTER SCHOOL FUNDS.

(G) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $247,600.00 FOR MICHIGAN MODEL PARTNERSHIP FOR CHARACTER EDUCATION PROGRAMS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE X, FUND FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EDUCATION FUNDS.

(H) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,909,600.00 FOR RURAL AND LOW INCOME SCHOOLS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, RURAL AND LOW INCOME SCHOOL FUNDS.

(I) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $11,123,700.00 TO HELP SCHOOLS DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM PROGRAMS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I AND TITLE X, COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM FUNDS.

(J) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $401,388,600.00 TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAMS TO ENABLE EDUCATIONALLY DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN TO MEET CHALLENGING ACADEMIC STANDARDS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN FUNDS.

(K) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $8,246,600.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING UNIFIED FAMILY LITERACY PROGRAMS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, EVEN START FUNDS.

(l) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $8,953,100.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTIFYING AND SERVING MIGRANT CHILDREN, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, MIGRANT EDUCATION FUNDS.

(M) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $22,779,000.00 TO PROMOTE HIGH-QUALITY SCHOOL READING INSTRUCTION FOR GRADES K-3, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, READING FIRST STATE GRANT FUNDS.

(N) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $11,585,100.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE VI, INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FUNDS.

(O) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $11,161,200.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES, AFTER SCHOOL AND DURING THE SUMMER, FOR CHILDREN IN LOW-PERFORMING SCHOOLS, FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER FUNDS.

(2) FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 TO DISTRICTS, INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE ENTITIES ALL AVAILABLE FEDERAL FUNDING, ESTIMATED AT $6,495,300.00, FOR THE FOLLOWING PROGRAMS THAT ARE FUNDED BY FEDERAL GRANTS:

(A) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $600,000.00 FOR ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME EDUCATION GRANTS, FUNDED FROM HHS-CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL, AIDS FUNDING.

(B) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $976,000.00 FOR AT-RISK CHILD CARE, FUNDED FROM HHS-ACF, AT-RISK CHILD CARE FUNDS.

(C) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,553,500.00 FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES TO IMMIGRANTS, FUNDED FROM DED-OBEMLA, EMERGENCY IMMIGRANT EDUCATION ASSISTANCE FUNDS.

(D) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,468,300.00 TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTH, FUNDED FROM DED-OVAE, HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTH FUNDS.

(E) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $400,000.00 FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN SCHOOL IMPACT GRANTS, FUNDED FROM HHS-ACF, REFUGEE CHILDREN SCHOOL IMPACT FUNDS.

(F) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $857,500.00 FOR SCHOOL-AGE CHILD CARE GRANTS, FUNDED FROM HHS-ACF, DEPENDENT CARE BLOCK GRANT FUNDS.

(G) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $640,000.00 FOR SERVE AMERICA GRANTS, FUNDED FROM THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDS.

(3) ALL FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW AND WITH FLEXIBILITY PROVISIONS OUTLINED IN PUBLIC LAW 107-116 AND IN THE EDUCATION FLEXIBILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 1999, PUBLIC LAW 106-25, 113 STAT. 41. NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 17B, PAYMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO DISTRICTS, INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE ENTITIES UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE PAID ON A SCHEDULE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT.

(4) AS USED IN THIS SECTION:

(A) "DED" MEANS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

(B) "DED-OBEMLA" MEANS THE DED OFFICE OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND MINORITY LANGUAGES AFFAIRS.

(D) "DED-OVAE" MEANS THE DED OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION.

(E) "HHS" MEANS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

(F) "HHS-ACF" MEANS THE HHS ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

Sec. 41. From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $4,212,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to applicant districts and intermediate districts offering programs of bilingual instruction for pupils of limited English-speaking ability under section 1153 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1153. Reimbursement shall be on a per pupil basis and shall be based on the number of pupils of limited English-speaking ability in membership on the pupil membership count day. Funds allocated under this section shall be used solely for bilingual instruction in speaking, reading, writing, or comprehension of pupils of limited English-speaking ability.

Sec. 51a. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated for 2000-2001 an amount not to exceed $739,021,900.00 from state sources and all available federal funding under sections 611 to 619 of part B of the individuals with disabilities education act, title VI of Public Law 91-230, 20 U.S.C. 1411 to 1419, estimated at $160,000,000.00, plus any carryover federal funds from previous year appropriations; there is allocated for 2001-2002 an amount not to exceed ~~$794,821,900.00~~ $796,401,900.00 from state sources and all available federal funding UNDER SECTIONS 611 TO 619 OF PART B OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT, TITLE VI OF PUBLIC LAW 91-230, 20 U.S.C. 1411 TO 1419, estimated at $203,000,000.00, plus any carryover federal funds from previous year appropriations; and there is allocated for 2002-2003 an amount not to exceed ~~$848,661,900.00~~ $852,721,900.00 from state sources and all available federal funding, estimated at $235,000,000.00, plus any carryover federal funds from previous year appropriations. The allocations under this subsection are for the purpose of reimbursing districts and intermediate districts for special education programs, services, and special education personnel as prescribed in article 3 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1701 to 380.1766; net tuition payments made by intermediate districts to the Michigan schools for the deaf and blind; and special education programs and services for pupils who are eligible for special education programs and services according to statute or rule. For meeting the costs of special education programs and services not reimbursed under this article, a district or intermediate district may use money in general funds or special education funds, not otherwise restricted, or contributions from districts to intermediate districts, tuition payments, gifts and contributions from individuals, or federal funds that may be available for this purpose, as determined by the intermediate district plan prepared pursuant to article 3 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1701 to 380.1766. ALL FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION IN EXCESS OF THOSE ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION FOR 2001-2002 MAY BE DISTRIBUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 34 C.F.R. 300.234 AND SECTION 613(a)(2)(D) OF PART B OF TITLE VI OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT, PUBLIC LAW 91-230, 20 U.S.C. 1413. NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 17B, PAYMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO DISTRICTS, INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE ENTITIES UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE PAID ON A SCHEDULE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT.

(2) From the funds allocated under subsection (1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 the amount necessary, estimated at ~~$128,200,000.00 for 2000-2001, $138,000,000.00~~ $139,200,000.00 for 2001-2002, and ~~$148,000,000.00~~ $149,500,000.00 for 2002-2003, for payments toward reimbursing districts and intermediate districts for 28.6138% of total approved costs of special education, excluding costs reimbursed under section 53a, and 70.4165% of total approved costs of special education transportation. Allocations under this subsection shall be made as follows:

(a) The initial amount allocated to a district under this subsection toward fulfilling the specified percentages shall be calculated by multiplying the district's special education pupil membership, excluding pupils described in subsection (12), times the sum of the foundation allowance under section 20 of the pupil's district of residence plus the amount of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2), not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current fiscal year and $5,000.00, or, for a special education pupil in membership in a district that is a public school academy or university school, times an amount equal to the amount per membership pupil calculated under section 20(6). For an intermediate district, the amount allocated under this subdivision toward fulfilling the specified percentages shall be an amount per special education membership pupil, excluding pupils described in subsection (12), and shall be calculated in the same manner as for a district, using the foundation allowance under section 20 of the pupil's district of residence, not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current fiscal year and $5,000.00, and that district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2). However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subdivision shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(b) After the allocations under subdivision (a), districts and intermediate districts for which the payments under subdivision (a) do not fulfill the specified percentages shall be paid the amount necessary to achieve the specified percentages for the district or intermediate district.

(3) From the funds allocated under subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 the amount necessary, estimated at ~~$3,000,000.00~~ $2,000,000.00 each fiscal year, to make payments to districts and intermediate districts under this subsection. If the amount allocated to a district or intermediate district for a fiscal year under subsection (2)(b) is less than the sum of the amounts allocated to the district or intermediate district for 1996-97 under sections 52 and 58, there is allocated to the district or intermediate district for the fiscal year an amount equal to that difference, adjusted by applying the same proration factor that was used in the distribution of funds under section 52 in 1996-97 as adjusted to the district's or intermediate district's necessary costs of special education used in calculations for the fiscal year. This adjustment is to reflect reductions in special education program operations between 1996-97 and subsequent fiscal years. ~~Beginning in 2000-2001, adjustments~~ ADJUSTMENTS for reductions in special education program operations shall be made in a manner determined by the department and shall include adjustments for program shifts.

(4) If the department determines that the sum of the amounts allocated for a fiscal year to a district or intermediate district under subsection (2)(a) and (b) is not sufficient to fulfill the specified percentages in subsection (2), then the shortfall shall be paid to the district or intermediate district during the fiscal year beginning on the October 1 following the determination and payments under subsection (3) shall be adjusted as necessary. If the department determines that the sum of the amounts allocated for a fiscal year to a district or intermediate district under subsection (2)(a) and (b) exceeds the sum of the amount necessary to fulfill the specified percentages in subsection (2), then the department shall deduct the amount of the excess from the district's or intermediate district's payments under this act for the fiscal year beginning on the October 1 following the determination and payments under subsection (3) shall be adjusted as necessary. However, if the amount allocated under subsection (2)(a) in itself exceeds the amount necessary to fulfill the specified percentages in subsection (2), there shall be no deduction under this subsection.

(5) State funds shall be allocated on a total approved cost basis. Federal funds shall be allocated under applicable federal requirements, except that an amount not to exceed $3,500,000.00 each fiscal year may be allocated by the department ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 to districts or intermediate districts on a competitive grant basis for programs, equipment, and services that the department determines to be designed to benefit or improve special education on a statewide scale.

(6) From the amount allocated in subsection (1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $2,200,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 to reimburse 100% of the net increase in necessary costs incurred by a district or intermediate district in implementing the revisions in the administrative rules for special education that became effective on July 1, 1987. As used in this subsection, "net increase in necessary costs" means the necessary additional costs incurred solely because of new or revised requirements in the administrative rules minus cost savings permitted in implementing the revised rules. Net increase in necessary costs shall be determined in a manner specified by the department.

(7) For purposes of this article, all of the following apply:

(a) "Total approved costs of special education" shall be determined in a manner specified by the department and may include indirect costs, but shall not exceed 115% of approved direct costs for section 52 and section 53a programs. The total approved costs include salary and other compensation for all approved special education personnel for the program, including payments for social security and medicare and public school employee retirement system contributions. The total approved costs do not include salaries or other compensation paid to administrative personnel who are not special education personnel as defined in section 6 of the revised school code, MCL 380.6. Costs reimbursed by federal funds, other than those federal funds included in the allocation made under this article, are not included. Special education approved personnel not utilized full time in the evaluation of students or in the delivery of special education programs, ancillary, and other related services shall be reimbursed under this section only for that portion of time actually spent providing these programs and services, with the exception of special education programs and services provided to youth placed in child caring institutions or juvenile detention programs approved by the department to provide an on-grounds education program.

(b) Reimbursement for ancillary and other related services, as defined by R 340.1701 of the Michigan administrative code, shall not be provided when those services are covered by and available through private group health insurance carriers or federal reimbursed program sources unless the department and district or intermediate district agree otherwise and that agreement is approved by the state budget director. Expenses, other than the incidental expense of filing, shall not be borne by the parent. In addition, the filing of claims shall not delay the education of a pupil. A district or intermediate district shall be responsible for payment of a deductible amount and for an advance payment required until the time a claim is paid.

(8) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 an amount not to exceed $15,313,900.00 each fiscal year to intermediate districts. The payment under this subsection to each intermediate district shall be equal to the amount of the 1996-97 allocation to the intermediate district under subsection (6) of this section as in effect for 1996-97.

(9) A pupil who is enrolled in a full-time special education program conducted or administered by an intermediate district or a pupil who is enrolled in the Michigan schools for the deaf and blind shall not be included in the membership count of a district, but shall be counted in membership in the intermediate district of residence.

(10) Special education personnel transferred from 1 district to another to implement the revised school code shall be entitled to the rights, benefits, and tenure to which the person would otherwise be entitled had that person been employed by the receiving district originally.

(11) If a district or intermediate district uses money received under this section for a purpose other than the purpose or purposes for which the money is allocated, the department may require the district or intermediate district to refund the amount of money received. Money that is refunded shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the state school aid fund.

(12) From the funds allocated in subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 the amount necessary, estimated at ~~$6,700,000.00 for 2000-2001, $7,100,000.00 for 2001-2002, and $7,300,000.00 for 2002-2003~~ $7,200,000.00 EACH FISCAL YEAR, to pay the foundation allowances for pupils described in this subsection. The allocation to a district under this subsection shall be calculated by multiplying the number of pupils described in this subsection who are counted in membership in the district times the sum of the foundation allowance under section 20 of the pupil's district of residence plus the amount of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2), not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current fiscal year and $5,000.00, or, for a pupil described in this subsection who is counted in membership in a district that is a public school academy or university school, times an amount equal to the amount per membership pupil under section 20(6). The allocation to an intermediate district under this subsection shall be calculated in the same manner as for a district, using the foundation allowance under section 20 of the pupil's district of residence, not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current fiscal year and $5,000.00, and that district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2). However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00. This subsection applies to all of the following pupils:

(a) Pupils described in section 53a.

(b) Pupils counted in membership in an intermediate district who are not special education pupils and are served by the intermediate district in a juvenile detention or child caring facility.

(c) Emotionally impaired pupils counted in membership by an intermediate district and provided educational services by the department of community health.

(13) After payments under subsections (2) and (12) and section 51c, the remaining expenditures from the allocation in subsection (1) shall be made in the following order:

(a) 100% of the reimbursement required under section 53a.

(b) 100% of the reimbursement required under subsection (6).

(d) 100% of the payment required under subsection (3).

(e) 100% of the payment required under subsection (8).

(f) 100% of the payments under section 56.

(14) The allocations under subsection (2), subsection (3), and subsection (12) shall be allocations to intermediate districts only and shall not be allocations to districts, but instead shall be calculations used only to determine the state payments under section 22b.

Sec. 51c. As required by the court in the consolidated cases known as Durant v State of Michigan, Michigan supreme court docket no. 104458-104492, from the allocation under section 51a(1), there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 the amount necessary, estimated at ~~$529,000,000.00 for 2000-2001, $568,000,000.00~~ $576,100,000.00 for 2001-2002 ~~, and $611,000,000.00~~ AND $621,900,000.00 for 2002-2003, for payments to reimburse districts for 28.6138% of total approved costs of special education excluding costs reimbursed under section 53a, and 70.4165% of total approved costs of special education transportation. Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated, as determined by the department, may be used to supplement the allocations under sections 22a and 22b in order to fully fund those calculated allocations for the same fiscal year.

SEC. 51D. (1) FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 ALL AVAILABLE FEDERAL FUNDING, ESTIMATED AT $59,837,200.00, FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS THAT ARE FUNDED BY FEDERAL GRANTS. ALL FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW. NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 17B, PAYMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO DISTRICTS, INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS, AND OTHER ELIGIBLE ENTITIES UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE PAID ON A SCHEDULE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT.

(2) FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SUBSECTION (1), THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003:

(A) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $16,000,000.00 FOR HANDICAPPED INFANTS AND TODDLERS, FUNDED FROM DED-OSERS, HANDICAPPED INFANTS AND TODDLERS FUNDS.

(B) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $13,500,000.00 FOR PRESCHOOL GRANTS (PUBLIC LAW 94-142), FUNDED FROM DED-OSERS, HANDICAPPED PRESCHOOL INCENTIVE FUNDS.

(C) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $30,337,200.00 FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS FUNDED BY DED-OSERS, HANDICAPPED PROGRAM, INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT FUNDS.

(3) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "DED-OSERS" MEANS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.

Sec. 53a. (1) For districts, reimbursement for pupils described in subsection (2), reimbursement shall be 100% of the total approved costs of operating special education programs and services approved by the department and included in the intermediate district plan adopted pursuant to article 3 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1701 to 380.1766, minus the district's foundation allowance calculated under section 20, and minus the amount ~~of the district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2)~~ CALCULATED FOR THE DISTRICT UNDER SECTION 20J. For intermediate districts, reimbursement for pupils described in section (2) shall be calculated in the same manner as for a district, using the foundation allowance under section 20 of the pupil's district of residence, not to exceed $6,500.00 adjusted by the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance under section 20 for the current fiscal year and $5,000.00, and ~~that district's per pupil allocation under section 20j(2)~~ THE AMOUNT CALCULATED FOR THAT DISTRICT UNDER SECTION 20J. However, beginning in 2002-2003, the $6,500.00 amount prescribed in this subsection shall be adjusted each year by an amount equal to the dollar amount of the difference between the basic foundation allowance for the current state fiscal year and $5,000.00, minus $200.00.

(2) Reimbursement under subsection (1) is for the following special education pupils:

(a) Pupils assigned to a district or intermediate district through the community placement program of the courts or a state agency, if the pupil was a resident of another intermediate district at the time the pupil came under the jurisdiction of the court or a state agency.

(b) Pupils who are residents of institutions operated by the department of community health.

(c) Pupils who are former residents of department of community health institutions for the developmentally disabled who are placed in community settings other than the pupil's home.

(d) Pupils enrolled in a department-approved on-grounds educational program longer than 180 days, but not longer than 233 days, at a residential child care institution, if the child care institution offered in 1991-92 an on-grounds educational program longer than 180 days but not longer than 233 days.

(e) Pupils placed in a district by a parent for the purpose of seeking a suitable home, if the parent does not reside in the same intermediate district as the district in which the pupil is placed.

(3) Only those costs that are clearly and directly attributable to educational programs for pupils described in subsection (2), and that would not have been incurred if the pupils were not being educated in a district or intermediate district, are reimbursable under this section.

(4) The costs of transportation shall be funded under this section and shall not be reimbursed under section 58.

(5) Not more than $14,800,000.00 each fiscal year for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , and 2002-2003, of the allocation in section 51a(1) shall be allocated under this section.

(6) From the allocation in subsection (5), there is allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 an amount not to exceed $150,000.00 to an intermediate district that received at least $1,000,000.00 for 1999-2000 under subsection (4).

Sec. 54. In addition to the aid received under section 52, each intermediate district shall receive an amount per pupil for each pupil in attendance at the Michigan schools for the deaf and blind. The amount shall be proportionate to the total instructional cost at each school. Not more than $1,688,000.00 each fiscal year for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , and 2002-2003 of the allocation in section 51a(1) shall be allocated under this section.

SEC. 55. FROM THE STATE SCHOOL AID FUND MONEY APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED $500,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 TO THE WEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS LOCATED AT GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOR DEVELOPING COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS WITH AREA DISTRICTS AND INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO QUALIFYING PUPILS. THIS FUNDING IS FOR DEVELOPMENT COSTS IN 2002-2003 AND IS INTENDED TO CONTINUE TO FUND OPERATIONAL AND PROGRAM COSTS IN SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEARS.

Sec. 56. (1) For the purposes of this section:

(b) "Millage levied" means the millage levied for special education pursuant to part 30 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1711 to 380.1743, including a levy for debt service obligations.

(c) "Taxable value" means the total taxable value of the districts constituent to an intermediate district, except that if a district has elected not to come under part 30 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1711 to 380.1743, membership and taxable value of the district shall not be included in the membership and taxable value of the intermediate district.

(2) From the allocation under section 51a(1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed ~~$38,120,000.00 for 2000-2001, $44,720,000.00 for 2001-2002, and $45,360,000.00~~ $37,900,000.00 FOR 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $38,120,000.00 for 2002-2003 to reimburse intermediate districts levying millages for special education pursuant to part 30 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1711 to 380.1743. The purpose, use, and expenditure of the reimbursement shall be limited as if the funds were generated by these millages and governed by the intermediate district plan adopted pursuant to article 3 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1701 to 380.1766. As a condition of receiving funds under this section, an intermediate district distributing any portion of special education millage funds to its constituent districts shall submit for departmental approval and implement a distribution plan.

(3) Reimbursement for those millages levied in 1999-2000 shall be made in 2000-2001 at an amount per 1999-2000 membership pupil computed by subtracting from $111,700.00 the 1999-2000 taxable value behind each membership pupil, and multiplying the resulting difference by the 1999-2000 millage levied. Reimbursement for those millages levied in 2000-2001 shall be made in 2001-2002 at an amount per 2000-2001 membership pupil computed by subtracting from ~~$118,000.00~~ $119,200.00 the 2000-2001 taxable value behind each membership pupil and multiplying the resulting difference by the 2000-2001 millage levied. Reimbursement for those millages levied in 2001-2002 shall be made in 2002-2003 at an amount per 2001-2002 membership pupil computed by subtracting from ~~$123,500.00~~ $125,900.00 the 2001-2002 taxable value behind each membership pupil and multiplying the resulting difference by the 2001-2002 millage levied.

(4) From the allocation in subsection (2), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $2,440,000.00 for 2000-2001, an amount not to exceed $6,820,000.00 for 2001-2002, and an amount not to exceed $7,240,000.00 for 2002-2003 for payments to intermediate districts under this subsection that do not qualify for a payment under subsection (3) for reimbursement for changes as a result of revisions to the personal property tax depreciation tables. To receive a payment under this subsection, an intermediate district shall file a claim by July 1 of the fiscal year to the department, detailing the loss of revenue to the intermediate district's special education millage attributable to those revisions. The amount of the payment under this subsection to each intermediate district shall be an amount equal to the same proportion of the total amount of funding available under this subsection as the intermediate district's claim under this section bears to the total amount of claims under this subsection and, notwithstanding section 121, shall not be adjusted for prior year adjustments more than 2 years after the end of the state fiscal year for which payment under this subsection was made.

Sec. 57. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $600,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to applicant intermediate districts that provide support services for the education of gifted and talented pupils. An intermediate district is entitled to 75% of the actual salary, but not to exceed $25,000.00 reimbursement for an individual salary, of a support services teacher approved by the department, and not to exceed $4,000.00 reimbursement for expenditures to support program costs, excluding in-county travel and salary, as approved by the department.

(2) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $400,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to support part of the cost of summer institutes for gifted and talented students. This amount shall be contracted to applicant intermediate districts in cooperation with a local institution of higher education and shall be coordinated by the department.

(3) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $5,000,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $4,000,000.00 EACH FISCAL YEAR for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 for the development and operation of comprehensive programs for gifted and talented pupils. An eligible district or consortium of districts shall receive an amount not to exceed $100.00 per K-12 pupil for up to 5% of the district's or consortium's K-12 membership for the immediately preceding fiscal year with a minimum total grant of $6,000.00. Funding shall be provided in the following order: the per pupil allotment, and then the minimum total grant of $6,000.00 to individual districts. An intermediate district may act as the fiscal agent for a consortium of districts. In order to be eligible for funding under this subsection, the district or consortium of districts shall submit each year a current 3-year plan for operating a comprehensive program for gifted and talented pupils and the district or consortium shall demonstrate to the department that the district or consortium will contribute matching funds of at least $50.00 per K-12 pupil. The plan or revised plan shall be developed in accordance with criteria established by the department and shall be submitted to the department for approval. Within the criteria, the department shall encourage the development of consortia among districts of less than 5,000 memberships.

Sec. 61a. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $31,027,600.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to reimburse on an added cost basis districts, except for a district that served as the fiscal agent for a vocational education consortium in the 1993-94 school year, and secondary area vocational-technical education centers for secondary-level vocational-technical education programs, including parenthood education programs, according to rules approved by the superintendent. Applications for participation in the programs shall be submitted in the form prescribed by the department. The department shall determine the added cost for each vocational-technical program area. The allocation of added cost funds shall be based on the type of vocational-technical programs provided, the number of pupils enrolled, and the length of the training period provided, and shall not exceed 75% of the added cost of any program. With the approval of the department, the board of a district maintaining a secondary vocational-technical education program may offer the program for the period from the close of the school year until September 1. The program shall use existing facilities and shall be operated as prescribed by rules promulgated by the superintendent.

(2) Except for a district that served as the fiscal agent for a vocational education consortium in the 1993-94 school year, districts and intermediate districts shall be reimbursed for local vocational administration, shared time vocational administration, and career education planning district vocational-technical administration. The definition of what constitutes administration and reimbursement shall be pursuant to guidelines adopted by the superintendent. Not more than $800,000.00 of the allocation in subsection (1) shall be distributed under this subsection.

(3) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $388,700.00 each fiscal year to intermediate districts with constituent districts that had combined state and local revenue per membership pupil in the 1994-95 state fiscal year of $6,500.00 or more, served as a fiscal agent for a state board designated area vocational education center in the 1993-94 school year, and had an adjustment made to their 1994-95 combined state and local revenue per membership pupil pursuant to section 20d. The payment under this subsection to the intermediate district shall equal the amount of the allocation to the intermediate district for 1996-97 under this subsection.

Sec. 62. (1) For the purposes of this section:

(a) "Membership" means for a particular fiscal year the total membership for the immediately preceding fiscal year of the intermediate district and the districts constituent to the intermediate district or the total membership for the immediately preceding fiscal year of the area vocational-technical program.

(b) "Millage levied" means the millage levied for area vocational-technical education pursuant to sections 681 to 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.681 to 380.690, including a levy for debt service obligations incurred as the result of borrowing for capital outlay projects and in meeting capital projects fund requirements of area vocational-technical education.

(c) "Taxable value" means the total taxable value of the districts constituent to an intermediate district or area vocational-technical education program, except that if a district has elected not to come under sections 681 to 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.681 to 380.690, the membership and taxable value of that district shall not be included in the membership and taxable value of the intermediate district. However, the membership and taxable value of a district that has elected not to come under sections 681 to 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.681 to 380.690, shall be included in the membership and taxable value of the intermediate district if the district meets both of the following:

(i) The district operates the area vocational-technical education program pursuant to a contract with the intermediate district.

(ii) The district contributes an annual amount to the operation of the program that is commensurate with the revenue that would have been raised for operation of the program if millage were levied in the district for the program under sections 681 to 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.681 to 380.690.

(2) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $9,810,000.00 ~~for 2000-2001, an amount not to exceed $11,190,000.00 for 2001-2002,~~ FOR 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,860,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 to reimburse intermediate districts and area vocational-technical education programs established under section 690(3) of the revised school code, MCL 380.690, levying millages for area vocational-technical education pursuant to sections 681 to 690 of the revised school code, MCL 380.681 to 380.690. The purpose, use, and expenditure of the reimbursement shall be limited as if the funds were generated by those millages.

(3) Reimbursement for the millages levied in 1999-2000 shall be made in 2000-2001 at an amount per 1999-2000 membership pupil computed by subtracting from $114,300.00 the 1999-2000 taxable value behind each membership pupil, and multiplying the resulting difference by the 1999-2000 millage levied. Reimbursement for the millages levied in 2000-2001 shall be made in 2001-2002 at an amount per 2000-2001 membership pupil computed by subtracting from ~~$121,500.00~~ $122,300.00 the 2000-2001 taxable value behind each membership pupil, and multiplying the resulting difference by the 2000-2001 millage levied. Reimbursement for the millages levied in 2001-2002 shall be made in 2002-2003 at an amount per 2001-2002 membership pupil computed by subtracting from ~~$127,600.00~~ $130,200.00 the 2001-2002 taxable value behind each membership pupil, and multiplying the resulting difference by the 2001-2002 millage levied.

(4) From the allocation in subsection (2), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $500,000.00 for 2000-2001, an amount not to exceed $1,380,000.00 for 2001-2002, for payments to intermediate districts under this subsection that do not qualify for a payment under subsection (3) for reimbursement for changes as a result of revisions to the personal property tax depreciation tables. To receive a payment under this subsection, an intermediate district shall file a claim by July 1 of the fiscal year to the department, detailing the loss of revenue to the intermediate district's vocational education millage attributable to those revisions. The amount of the payment under this subsection to each intermediate district shall be an amount equal to the same proportion of the total amount of funding available under this subsection as the intermediate district's claim under this section bears to the total amount of claims under this subsection and, notwithstanding section 121, shall not be adjusted for prior year adjustments more than 2 years after the end of the state fiscal year for which payment under this subsection was made.

Sec. 67. (1) From the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $350,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 for Michigan career preparation system grants under this section.

(2) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated $150,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to the department to identify uniform career competency standards and assessments for career clusters, to establish a statewide information system on current and anticipated employment opportunities and the required level of skills and education required for employment.

(3) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated $100,000.00 each fiscal year for ~~2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to the department to provide information to parents, pupils, school personnel, employers, and others regarding opportunities to receive integrated academic and technical preparation in the public schools of this state.

(4) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated $100,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to the department to provide technical assistance to eligible education agencies and workforce development boards.

(5) As used in this section and in section 68:

(a) "Advanced career academy" means a career-technical education program operated by a district, by an intermediate district, or by a public school academy, that applies for and receives advanced career academy designation from the department. To receive this designation, a career-technical education program shall meet criteria established by the department, which criteria shall include at least all of the following:

(i) Operation of programs for those career clusters identified by the department as being eligible for advanced career academy status.

(ii) Involvement of employers in the design and implementation of career-technical education programs.

(iii) A fully integrated program of academic and technical education available to pupils.

(iv) Demonstration of an established career preparation system resulting in industry-validated career ladders for graduates of the program, including, but not limited to, written articulation agreements with postsecondary institutions to allow pupils to receive advanced college placement and credit or federally registered apprenticeships, as applicable.

(b) "Career cluster" means a grouping of occupations from 1 or more industries that share common skill requirements.

(c) "Career preparation system" is a system of programs and strategies providing pupils with opportunities to prepare for success in careers of their choice.

(d) "Department" means the department of career development.

(e) "Eligible education agency" means a district, intermediate district, or advanced career academy that participates in an approved regional career preparation plan.

(f) "FTE" means full-time equivalent pupil as determined by the department.

(g) "Workforce development board" means a local workforce development board established pursuant to the workforce investment act of 1998, Public Law 105-220, 112 Stat. 936, and the school-to-work opportunities act of 1994, Public Law 103-239, 108 Stat. 568, or the equivalent.

(h) "Strategic plan" means a department-approved comprehensive plan prepared by a workforce development board with input from local representatives, including the education advisory group, that includes career preparation system goals and objectives for the region.

Sec. 68. (1) From the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $21,850,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to be used to implement the Michigan career preparation system in the corresponding school years as provided under this section. In order to receive funds under this section, an eligible education agency shall be part of an approved regional career preparation plan under subsection (2) and shall agree to expend the funds required under this section in accordance with the regional career preparation plan. Funds awarded under this section that are not expended in accordance with this section may be recovered by the department.

(2) In order to receive funding under this section, an eligible education agency shall be a part of an approved 3-year regional career preparation plan that is consistent with the workforce development board's strategic plan and is as described in this subsection. All of the following apply to a regional career preparation plan:

(a) A 3-year regional career preparation plan shall be developed under subdivisions (b), (c), and (d) for all public education agencies participating as part of a regional career preparation system within the geographical boundaries of a workforce development board, and revised annually. If an intermediate district is located within the geographical boundaries of more than 1 workforce development board, the board of the intermediate district shall choose 1 workforce development board with which to align and shall notify the department of this choice not later than October 31, 1997.

(b) The regional career preparation plan shall be developed by representatives of the education advisory group of each workforce development board in accordance with guidelines developed under former section 67(5), and in accordance with subdivisions (d) and (e). All of the following shall be represented on each education advisory group: workforce development board members, other employers, labor, districts, intermediate districts, postsecondary institutions, career/technical educators, parents of public school pupils, and academic educators. The representatives of districts, intermediate districts, and postsecondary institutions appointed to the education advisory group by the workforce development board shall be individuals designated by the board of the district, intermediate district, or postsecondary institution.

(c) By majority vote, the education advisory group may nominate 1 education representative, who may or may not be a member of the education advisory group, for appointment to the workforce development board. This education representative shall be in addition to existing education representation on the workforce development board. This education representative shall meet all workforce development board membership requirements.

(d) The components of the regional career preparation plan shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following:

(i) The roles of districts, intermediate districts, advanced career academies, postsecondary institutions, employers, labor representatives, and others in the career preparation system.

(ii) Programs to be offered, including at least career exploration activities, for middle school pupils.

(iii) Identification of integrated academic and technical curriculum, including related professional development training for teachers.

(iv) Identification of work-based learning opportunities for pupils and for teachers and other school personnel.

(v) Identification of testing and assessments that will be used to measure pupil achievement.

(vi) Identification of all federal, state, local, and private sources of funding available for career preparation activities in the region.

(e) The education advisory group shall develop a 3-year regional career preparation plan consistent with the workforce development board's strategic plan and submit the plan to the department for final approval. The submission to the department shall also include statements signed by the chair of the education advisory group and the chair of the workforce development board certifying that the plan has been reviewed by each entity. Upon department approval, all eligible education agencies designated in the regional career preparation plan as part of the career preparation delivery system are eligible for funding under this section.

(3) Funding under this section shall be distributed to eligible education agencies for allowable costs defined in this subsection and identified as necessary costs for implementing a regional career preparation plan, as follows:

(a) ~~For 2000-2001, the~~ THE department shall rank all career clusters, including career exploration, guidance, and counseling. Rank determination will be based on median salary data in career clusters and employment opportunity data provided by the council for career preparation standards. In addition, rank determination shall be based on placement data available for prior year graduates of the programs in the career clusters either in related careers or postsecondary education. The procedure for ranking of career clusters shall be determined by the department.

(b) Allowable costs to be funded under this section shall be determined by the department. Budgets submitted by eligible education agencies to the department in order to receive funding shall identify funds and in-kind contributions from the regional career education plan, excluding funds or in-kind contributions available as a result of funding received under section 61a, equal to at least 100% of anticipated funding under this section. Eligible categories of allowable costs are the following:

(i) Career exploration, guidance, and counseling.

(ii) Curriculum development, including integration of academic and technical content, and professional development for teachers directly related to career preparation.

(iii) Technology and equipment determined to be necessary.

(iv) Supplies and materials directly related to career preparation programs.

(v) Work-based learning expenses for pupils, teachers, and counselors.

(vi) Evaluation, including career competency testing and peer review.

(vii) Career placement services.

(viii) Student leadership organizations integral to the career preparation system.

(ix) Up to 10% of the allocation to an eligible education agency may be expended for planning, coordination, direct oversight, and accountability for the career preparation system.

(c) ~~For 2000-2001, the~~ THE department shall calculate career preparation costs per FTE for each career cluster, including career exploration, guidance, and counseling, by dividing the allowable costs for each career cluster by the prior year FTE enrollment for each career cluster. Distribution to eligible education agencies shall be the product of 50% of career preparation costs per FTE times the current year FTE enrollment of each career cluster. This allocation shall be distributed to eligible education agencies in decreasing order of the career cluster ranking described in subdivision (a) until the money allocated for grant recipients in this section is distributed. Beginning in 2001-2002, funds shall be distributed to eligible education agencies according to workforce development board geographic area consistent with subsection (2)(a) based upon the proportion of each workforce development board area's K-12 public school membership to the total state K-12 public school membership.

(4) The department shall establish a review procedure for assessing the career preparation system in each region.

(5) An education advisory group is responsible for assuring the quality of the career preparation system. An education advisory group shall review the career preparation system in accordance with evaluation criteria established by the department.

(6) An education advisory group shall report its findings and recommendations for changes to the participating eligible education agencies, the workforce development board, and the department.

(7) The next revision of a regional career preparation plan shall take into account the findings of the education advisory group in accordance with evaluation criteria established by the department in order for the affected education agencies to receive continued funding under this section.

Sec. 74. (1) From the amount appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $1,625,000.00 each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 for the purposes of subsections (2) and (3).

(2) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year the amount necessary for payments to state supported colleges or universities and intermediate districts providing school bus driver safety instruction or driver skills road tests pursuant to sections 51 and 52 of the pupil transportation act, 1990 PA 187, MCL 257.1851 and 257.1852. The payments shall be in an amount determined by the department not to exceed 75% of the actual cost of instruction and driver compensation for each public or nonpublic school bus driver attending a course of instruction. For the purpose of computing compensation, the hourly rate allowed each school bus driver shall not exceed the hourly rate received for driving a school bus. Reimbursement compensating the driver during the course of instruction or driver skills road tests shall be made by the department to the college or university or intermediate district providing the course of instruction.

(3) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated each fiscal year the amount necessary to pay the reasonable costs of nonspecial education auxiliary services transportation provided pursuant to section 1323 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1323. Districts funded under this subsection shall not receive funding under any other section of this act for nonspecial education auxiliary services transportation.

Sec. 81. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, from the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 to the intermediate districts the sum necessary, but not to exceed ~~$87,781,700.00 for 2000-2001, not to exceed~~ $92,170,800.00 for 2001-2002 AND NOT TO EXCEED $95,028,100.00 FOR 2002-2003 to provide state aid to intermediate districts under this section. Except as otherwise provided in this section, there shall be allocated to each intermediate district for 2000-2001 an amount equal to 105.3% of the amount of funding actually received by the intermediate district under this subsection for 1999-2000. Except as otherwise provided in this section, there shall be allocated to each intermediate district for 2001-2002 an amount equal to 105% of the amount of funding actually received by the intermediate district under this subsection for 2000-2001. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION, THERE SHALL BE ALLOCATED TO EACH INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT FOR 2002-2003 AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 103.1% OF THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT UNDER THIS SUBSECTION FOR 2001-2002. Funding provided under this section shall be used to comply with requirements of this act and the revised school code that are applicable to intermediate districts, and for which funding is not provided elsewhere in this act, and to provide technical assistance to districts as authorized by the intermediate school board.

(2) From the allocation in subsection (1), there is allocated to an intermediate district, formed by the consolidation or annexation of 2 or more intermediate districts or the attachment of a total intermediate district to another intermediate school district or the annexation of all of the constituent K-12 districts of a previously existing intermediate school district which has disorganized, an additional allotment of $3,500.00 each fiscal year for each intermediate district included in the new intermediate district for 3 years following consolidation, annexation, or attachment.

(3) If an intermediate district participated in 1993-94 in a consortium operating a regional educational media center under section 671 of the revised school code, MCL 380.671, and rules promulgated by the superintendent, and if the intermediate district obtains written consent from each of the other intermediate districts that participated in the consortium in 1993-94, the intermediate district may notify the department not later than December 30 of the current fiscal year that it is electing to directly receive its payment attributable to participation in that consortium. An intermediate district making that election, and that has obtained the necessary consent, shall receive each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 OR FOR 2002-2003, as applicable, for each pupil in membership in the intermediate district or a constituent district an amount equal to the quotient of the 1993-94 allocation to the fiscal agent for that consortium under former section 83, adjusted as determined by the department to account for that election, divided by the combined total membership for the current fiscal year in all of the intermediate districts that participated in that consortium and their constituent districts. The amount allocated to an intermediate district under this subsection for a fiscal year shall be deducted from the total allocation for that fiscal year under this section to the intermediate district that was the 1993-94 fiscal agent for the consortium.

(4) During a fiscal year, the department shall not increase an intermediate district's allocation under subsection (1) because of an adjustment made by the department during the fiscal year in the intermediate district's taxable value for a prior year. Instead, the department shall report the adjustment and the estimated amount of the increase to the house and senate fiscal agencies and the state budget director not later than June 1 of the fiscal year, and the legislature shall appropriate money for the adjustment in the next succeeding fiscal year.

(5) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $320,000.00 for 2000-2001, an amount not to exceed $890,000.00 for 2001-2002, for payments to intermediate districts under this subsection for reimbursement for changes as a result of revisions to the personal property tax depreciation tables. To receive a payment under this subsection, an intermediate district shall file a claim by July 1 of the fiscal year to the department, detailing the loss of revenue to the intermediate district's operational millage attributable to those revisions. The amount of the payment under this subsection to each intermediate district shall be an amount equal to the same proportion of the total amount of funding available under this subsection as the intermediate district's claim under this subsection bears to the total amount of the claims under this subsection and, notwithstanding section 121, shall not be adjusted for prior year adjustments more than 2 years after the end of the state fiscal year for which payment under this subsection was made.

(5) ~~(6)~~ In order to receive funding under this section, an intermediate district shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the department that the intermediate district employs at least 1 person who is trained in pupil counting procedures, rules, and regulations.

Sec. 94. From the general fund money appropriated in section 11, there is allocated to the department ~~an amount not to exceed $3,000,000.00 for 2000-2001~~ an amount not to exceed $3,000,000.00 for 2001-2002 , AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,000,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 to provide technical assistance to districts for school accreditation purposes as described in section 1280 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1280.

Sec. 94a. (1) From the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed $2,160,000.00 for 2000-2001, an amount not to exceed $2,332,000.00 for 2002, for payments to the center for educational performance and information created pursuant to executive order.

(2) The goals of the center for educational performance and information shall be to improve the quality and quantity of educational data available to teachers, school administrators, parents, taxpayers, and others.

(3) A portion of the funds allocated under this section may be used for funding to districts to cover additional costs resulting from implementation of the center for educational performance and information.

(4) Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the fiscal year in which they were allocated may be carried forward to a subsequent fiscal year. From the funds allocated for 1999-2000 that were carried forward under this subsection, the center shall pay districts grants for net costs incurred from 1998-1999 through 2002-2003 due to the implementation of the single record student database. The center shall also pay intermediate districts grants for net costs incurred from 1998-1999 through 2002-2003 due to the implementation of the single record student database on behalf of constituent districts. Net costs shall be determined and the amount of the grant calculated in a manner determined by the center. Purposes for which the center shall make grants to districts and intermediate districts may include purchases of software to submit data files to the Michigan education information system or new student information management systems compatible with the single record student database or costs associated with the development of the single record student database. The district or intermediate district shall provide written justification of these net costs to the center for education performance and information. Purposes for which a grant is made must be approved by the center. This reimbursement shall not exceed a total of $2.00 per pupil for each district or intermediate district.

(1) THERE IS CREATED WITHIN THE OFFICE OF THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET THE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND INFORMATION. THE CENTER SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

(A) COORDINATE THE COLLECTION OF ALL DATA REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL LAW FROM ALL ENTITIES RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER THIS ACT.

(B) COLLECT DATA IN THE MOST EFFICIENT MANNER POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON REPORTING ENTITIES.

(D) DEVELOP STATE AND MODEL LOCAL DATA COLLECTION POLICIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, POLICIES THAT ENSURE THE PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUAL STUDENT DATA. STATE PRIVACY POLICIES SHALL ENSURE THAT STUDENT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ARE NOT RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC FOR ANY PURPOSE.

(E) PROVIDE DATA IN A USEFUL MANNER TO ALLOW STATE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS TO MAKE INFORMED POLICY DECISIONS.

(F) PROVIDE REPORTS TO THE CITIZENS OF THIS STATE TO ALLOW THEM TO ASSESS ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES AND THE RETURN ON THEIR INVESTMENT IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM OF THIS STATE.

(G) ASSIST ALL ENTITIES RECEIVING FUNDS UNDER THIS ACT IN COMPLYING WITH AUDITS PERFORMED ACCORDING TO GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES.

(H) OTHER FUNCTIONS AS ASSIGNED BY THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR.

(2) THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR SHALL APPOINT A CEPI ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS:

(A) ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE HOUSE FISCAL AGENCY.

(B) ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE SENATE FISCAL AGENCY.

(D) ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY.

(E) ONE REPRESENTATIVE EACH FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY.

(F) THREE REPRESENTATIVES FROM INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS.

(G) ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH OF THE FOLLOWING EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS:

(i) MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS.

(ii) MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS.

(iii) MICHIGAN SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS.

(H) ONE REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTING PRIVATE SECTOR FIRMS RESPONSIBLE FOR AUDITING SCHOOL RECORDS.

(I) OTHER REPRESENTATIVES AS THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR DETERMINES ARE NECESSARY.

(3) THE CEPI ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTED UNDER SUBSECTION (2) SHALL PROVIDE ADVICE TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CENTER'S DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

(A) DETERMINING WHAT DATA IS NECESSARY TO COLLECT AND MAINTAIN IN ORDER TO PERFORM THE CENTER'S FUNCTIONS IN THE MOST EFFICIENT MANNER POSSIBLE.

(B) DEFINING THE ROLES OF ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN THE DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM.

(D) ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING DATA DEFINITIONS, DATA TRANSMISSION PROTOCOLS, AND SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR THE EFFICIENT AND ACCURATE TRANSMISSION AND COLLECTION OF DATA.

(E) ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING A PROCESS FOR ENSURING THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA.

(F) ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING STATE AND MODEL LOCAL POLICIES RELATED TO DATA COLLECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PRIVACY POLICIES RELATED TO INDIVIDUAL STUDENT DATA.

(G) ENSURING THE DATA IS MADE AVAILABLE TO STATE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS AND CITIZENS OF THIS STATE IN THE MOST USEFUL FORMAT POSSIBLE.

(H) OTHER MATTERS AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR OR THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER.

(4) THE CENTER MAY ENTER INTO ANY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS NECESSARY TO FULFILL ITS FUNCTIONS.

(5) FROM THE GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,332,000.00 FOR 2001-2002 FOR PAYMENTS TO THE CENTER. FROM THE GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,500,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO SUPPORT THE OPERATIONS OF THE CENTER. THE CENTER SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY TO ENSURE THAT THIS STATE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW AND IS MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR INCREASED FEDERAL FUNDING TO IMPROVE EDUCATION IN THIS STATE. IN ADDITION, FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11 FOR 2002-2003, THERE IS ALLOCATED THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS IN ORDER TO FULFILL FEDERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

(A) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,000,000.00 FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN FUNDS.

(B) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $284,700.00 FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, TITLE I, READING FIRST STATE GRANT FUNDS.

(D) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $500,000.00 FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FUNDS.

(E) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $526,100.00 FUNDED FROM DED-OESE, DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FUNDS.

(6) FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS SECTION THAT ARE NOT EXPENDED IN THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THEY WERE ALLOCATED MAY BE CARRIED FORWARD TO A SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEAR. FROM THE FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR 1999-2000 THAT WERE CARRIED FORWARD UNDER THIS SECTION AND FROM THE GENERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED UNDER THIS SECTION FOR 2002-2003, THE CENTER SHALL MAKE GRANTS TO INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS AND THEIR CONSTITUENT DISTRICTS IN DATA COLLECTION REQUIRED BY STATE AND FEDERAL LAW OR NECESSARY FOR AUDITS ACCORDING TO GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES. GRANTS TO EACH INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT SHALL BE MADE AT THE RATE OF $2.00 PER EACH FULL-TIME EQUATED MEMBERSHIP PUPIL TIMES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF 2000-2001 PUPILS IN MEMBERSHIP IN THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT AND ITS CONSTITUENT DISTRICTS. AN INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT SHALL DEVELOP A PLAN IN COOPERATION WITH ITS CONSTITUENT DISTRICTS TO DISTRIBUTE THE GRANTS BETWEEN THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT AND ITS CONSTITUENT DISTRICTS. THESE GRANTS SHALL BE PAID TO INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS NO LATER THAN THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED SCHOOL AID PAYMENT AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION.

(7) IF THE APPLICABLE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT DETERMINES THAT THE PUPIL COUNTS SUBMITTED BY A DISTRICT FOR THE FEBRUARY 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL PUPIL COUNT USING THE SINGLE RECORD STUDENT DATABASE CANNOT BE AUDITED BY THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 101, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:

(A) THE DISTRICT MAY SUBMIT ITS PUPIL COUNT DATA FOR THE FEBRUARY 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL PUPIL COUNT USING THE EDUCATION DATA NETWORK SYSTEM.

(B) IF THE APPLICABLE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT DETERMINES THAT THE PUPIL COUNTS SUBMITTED BY THE DISTRICT FOR THE 2002-2003 PUPIL MEMBERSHIP COUNT DAY USING THE SINGLE RECORD STUDENT DATABASE CANNOT BE AUDITED BY THE INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 101, THE DISTRICT MAY SUBMIT ITS PUPIL COUNT DATA FOR THE 2002-2003 PUPIL MEMBERSHIP COUNT DAY USING THE EDUCATION DATA NETWORK SYSTEM.

(8) AS USED IN THIS SECTION:

(A) "CENTER" MEANS THE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND INFORMATION CREATED UNDER THIS SECTION.

(B) "DED-OESE" MEANS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION.

Sec. 96. (1) From the state school aid fund money appropriated in section 11, there is allocated an amount not to exceed ~~$8,000,000.00 each fiscal year for 1999-2000, for 2000-2001,~~ $0.00 for 2001-2002 , and $1,320,000.00 for 2002-2003 for golden apple awards under this section. The awards shall be based on elementary school achievement on the fourth grade and fifth grade Michigan education assessment program (MEAP) tests.

(2) To be eligible for a golden apple award, an elementary school shall ~~have~~ MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

(A) HAS at least 50 pupils in membership. ~~and shall meet the following requirements:~~

(a) For 1999-2000, at least 80% of the fourth and fifth grade pupils enrolled and in regular daily attendance in the school on the pupil membership count day in that school year took the applicable MEAP tests, and 1 or both of the following are met:

(i) The composite score for the pupils in the school who took the applicable MEAP tests increased by at least 60 points over the 2 consecutive school years immediately preceding the state fiscal year in which the award is given.

(ii) The test scores for the pupils in the school who took the applicable MEAP tests are among the highest elementary school scores statewide, as determined by the department of treasury, for that school year.

~~(b) Beginning in 2000-2001, at~~

(B) AT least 90% of the fourth and fifth grade pupils enrolled and in regular daily attendance in the school on the pupil membership count day in that school year took the applicable MEAP tests. ~~, and~~

(3) A golden apple award under this section shall be allocated to and used by a district exclusively for the purpose of distributing funds to each eligible elementary school. A golden apple award shall consist of $1,000.00 per each full-time employee who works in the eligible elementary school plus $10,000.00 to be allocated to the principal of the school for school improvements, but shall not be less than $50,000.00 per recipient school. BEGINNING IN 2002-2003, THE MONETARY AMOUNT OF A GOLDEN APPLE AWARD SHALL BE $10,000.00 TO BE ALLOCATED TO EACH ELIGIBLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. All money allocated under this section ~~per full-time employee~~ shall be used for school improvements, as determined collectively by a majority vote of ~~those~~ THE FULL-TIME employees OF THE ELIGIBLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

~~(4) Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated may be carried forward to a subsequent state fiscal year.~~

Sec. 98. (1) From the general fund money appropriated in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $15,000,000.00 for 2000-2001, and~~ an amount not to exceed $1,500,000.00 ~~each fiscal year~~ for 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 to the department to provide a grant ~~each fiscal year~~ to the Michigan virtual university for the development, implementation, and operation of the Michigan virtual high school AND TO FUND OTHER PURPOSES DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION. IN ADDITION, FROM THE FEDERAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED EACH FISCAL YEAR FOR 2001-2002 AND 2002-2003 THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:

(A) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $3,251,800.00 FROM DED-OESE, TITLE II, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FUNDS.

(B) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $1,188,000.00 FROM DED-OESE, TITLE II, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY GRANTS FUNDS.

(D) AN AMOUNT ESTIMATED AT $100,500.00 FROM DED-OESE, TITLE VI, RURAL AND LOW INCOME SCHOOLS GRANTS FUNDS.

(2) The Michigan virtual high school shall have the following goals:

(a) Significantly expand curricular offerings for high schools across this state through agreements with districts or licenses from other recognized providers. THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING RIGOROUS CIVICS CURRICULA ONLINE.

(b) Create statewide instructional models using interactive multimedia tools delivered by electronic means, including, but not limited to, the internet, digital broadcast, or satellite network, for distributed learning at the high school level.

(d) Offer teachers opportunities to learn new skills and strategies for developing and delivering instructional services.

(e) Accelerate this state's ability to respond to current and emerging educational demands.

(f) Grant high school diplomas through a dual enrollment method with districts.

(g) Act as a broker for college level equivalent courses, as defined in section 1471 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1471, and dual enrollment courses from postsecondary education institutions.

(3) The Michigan virtual high school course offerings shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following:

(a) Information technology courses.

(b) College level equivalent courses, as defined in section 1471 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1471.

(d) Programs and services for at-risk pupils.

(e) General education development test preparation courses for adjudicated youth.

(f) Special interest courses.

(g) Professional development programs and services for teachers.

(4) FROM THE ALLOCATION IN SUBSECTION (1), THERE IS ALLOCATED $3,500,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO USE WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN THIS STATE. THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL IDENTIFY NOT MORE THAN 5 PILOT PROJECT SITES FOR THESE INITIATIVES. THE PILOT PROJECT SITES SHALL BE GEOGRAPHICALLY DIVERSE AND AT LEAST 1 OF THE PILOT PROJECT SITES SHALL BE IN THE UPPER PENINSULA. THE PILOT PROJECTS SHALL BE FUNDED THROUGH PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS. IN ADDITION, THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL ESTABLISH LOCAL FUND MATCHING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PILOT PROJECT SITES.

(5) THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY SHALL SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY REGARDING THE DED-OESE, TITLE II, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FUNDS AS PROVIDED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION. TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED UNDER FEDERAL LAW, THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL ADDRESS THE UNIQUE ISSUES OF PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN RURAL COMMUNITIES. THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UNDER THIS SUBSECTION SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY COORDINATE THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES RELATED TO DED-OESE, TITLE II, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW:

(A) DEVELOP, AND ASSIST DISTRICTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF, PROVEN, INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO DELIVER INTENSIVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS THAT ARE BOTH COST-EFFECTIVE AND EASILY ACCESSIBLE, SUCH AS STRATEGIES THAT INVOLVE DELIVERY THROUGH THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY, PEER NETWORKS, AND DISTANCE LEARNING.

(B) ENCOURAGE AND SUPPORT THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS TO EFFECTIVELY INTEGRATE TECHNOLOGY INTO CURRICULA AND INSTRUCTION.

(C) COORDINATE THE ACTIVITIES OF ELIGIBLE PARTNERSHIPS THAT INCLUDE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES FOR TEACHERS, PARAPROFESSIONALS, AND PRINCIPALS AS DEFINED IN FEDERAL LAW.

(6) THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY SHALL SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY REGARDING DED-OESE, TITLE II, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY GRANTS AS PROVIDED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION. THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL COORDINATE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION WITH THE PILOT PROJECT SITES IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION (4). THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY COORDINATE THE FOLLOWING STATE ACTIVITIES RELATED TO DED-OESE, TITLE II, EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY GRANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW:

(A) ASSIST IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE DELIVERY OF SPECIALIZED OR RIGOROUS ACADEMIC COURSES AND CURRICULA THROUGH THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING DISTANCE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES.

(B) ESTABLISH AND SUPPORT PUBLIC-PRIVATE INITIATIVES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR STUDENTS IN HIGH-NEED DISTRICTS.

(7) THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY SHALL SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY REGARDING DED-OESE, TITLE V, INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES GRANTS AS PROVIDED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION. THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL COORDINATE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTION WITH THE PILOT PROJECT SITES IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION (4). THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SHALL REQUIRE THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY TO COORDINATE THE FOLLOWING STATE-LEVEL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO DED-OESE, TITLE V, INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES GRANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW:

(A) PROGRAMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OR ACQUISITION AND USE OF INSTRUCTIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL USE, THAT WILL BE USED TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AS PART OF AN OVERALL EDUCATION REFORM STRATEGY.

(B) PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES THAT EXPAND LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH BEST-PRACTICE MODELS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE CLASSROOM LEARNING AND TEACHING.

(8) THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY SHALL SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY REQUIRING THAT THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY COORDINATE THE AWARDING OF COMPETITIVE GRANTS TO DISTRICTS AND STATE-LEVEL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO DED-OESE, TITLE VI, RURAL AND LOW INCOME SCHOOLS GRANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:

(A) TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING PROGRAMS THAT TRAIN TEACHERS TO UTILIZE TECHNOLOGY, PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE TEACHING, AND PROGRAMS TO TRAIN SPECIAL NEEDS TEACHERS.

(B) EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INCLUDING SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE, AS DESCRIBED IN FEDERAL LAW.

(9) ~~(4)~~ Funds allocated under this section that are not expended in the state fiscal year for which they were allocated may be carried forward to a subsequent state fiscal year.

(10) THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY AND THE MICHIGAN VIRTUAL UNIVERSITY SHALL COMPLETE THE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING REQUIRED UNDER THIS SECTION WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDATORY ACT THAT ADDED THIS SUBSECTION. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE THAT ALL PLANS OR APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE STATE EDUCATION AGENCY TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RELATING TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF FEDERAL FUNDS UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION.

(11) AS USED IN THIS SECTION:

(A) "DED-OESE" MEANS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION.

(B) "STATE EDUCATION AGENCY" MEANS THE DEPARTMENT.

Sec. 99. (1) From the state school aid fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $9,270,000.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $9,684,300.00 ~~for 2001-2002~~ EACH FISCAL YEAR FOR 2001-2002 AND FOR 2002-2003, and from the general fund appropriation in section 11 there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $475,100.00 for 2000-2001,~~ an amount not to exceed $548,000.00 ~~for 2001-2002~~ EACH FISCAL YEAR FOR 2001-2002 AND FOR 2002-2003, for implementing the comprehensive master plan for mathematics and science centers developed by the department and approved by the state board on February 17, 1993.

(2) Within a service area designated locally, approved by the department, and consistent with the master plan described in subsection (1), an established mathematics and science center shall address 2 or more of the following 6 basic services, as described in the master plan, to constituent districts and communities: leadership, pupil services, curriculum support, community involvement, professional development, and resource clearinghouse services.

(3) The department shall not award a grant under this section to more than 1 mathematics and science center located in a particular intermediate district unless each of the grants serves a distinct target population or provides a service that does not duplicate another program in the intermediate district.

(4) As part of the technical assistance process, the department shall provide minimum standard guidelines that may be used by the mathematics and science center for providing fair access for qualified pupils and professional staff as prescribed in this section.

(5) Allocations under this section to support the activities and programs of mathematics and science centers shall be continuing support grants to all 25 established mathematics and science centers and, subject to subsection (9), the 8 satellite extensions that were funded in 1996-97. ~~Beginning in 2000-2001, each~~ EACH established mathematics and science center that was funded in 1999-2000 shall receive an amount equal to 105.3% of the amount it received under this section in 1999-2000.

(6) In order to receive funds under this section, a grant recipient shall allow access for the department or the department's designee to audit all records related to the program for which it receives such funds. The grant recipient shall reimburse the state for all disallowances found in the audit.

(7) From the state school aid fund allocation under subsection (1), there is allocated an amount not to exceed $611,800.00 each fiscal year for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 for additional funding under this subsection for mathematics and science centers that have come into compliance with the comprehensive master plan described in subsection (1). These amounts are in addition to the funding determined under subsection (5) and are as follows for each of those fiscal years:

(a) $68,000.00 each to the central Michigan science, mathematics, and technology center; the Hillsdale-Lenawee-Monroe mathematics and science center; the St. Clair mathematics, science, and technology network; the Saginaw valley state university regional center; the Genesee area mathematics, science, and technology center; the Grand Traverse area regional mathematics, science, and technology center; and the Livingston/Washtenaw mathematics and science center.

(b) $85,000.00 to the Grand valley state university regional mathematics and science center.

(8) Not later than June 30, 2000, the department shall reevaluate and update the comprehensive master plan described in subsection (1), including any recommendations for upgrading satellite extensions to full centers.

(9) During the course of the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 fiscal years, the department shall facilitate the conversion of the 8 existing satellite extensions to full mathematics and science centers. To this end, in 2000-2001 the department shall provide 4 satellite extensions, as selected by the department, with applications for conversion to full centers, and in 2001-2002 the department shall provide the remaining 4 satellite extensions with applications for conversion. The department shall provide the applications not later than October 15 of the applicable fiscal year; a satellite extension shall submit the application and a detail plan as prescribed by the department not later than November 15 of the applicable fiscal year; and the department shall review the applications and plans and notify the satellite extensions of their status not later than December 1 of the applicable fiscal year. The allocations under this section are sufficient to fund the conversion of the satellite extensions to full centers and to fund them as full centers.

SEC. 99A. (1) FROM THE APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,180,000.00 FOR GRANTS TO INTERMEDIATE DISTRICTS AND DISTRICTS FOR PROVIDING A SCHOOL HEALTH EDUCATION CURRICULUM. THE CURRICULUM PROVIDED, SUCH AS THE MICHIGAN MODEL OR ANOTHER COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL HEALTH CURRICULUM, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEALTH EDUCATION GOALS ESTABLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN MODEL FOR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL HEALTH EDUCATION STEERING COMMITTEE. THIS STATE STEERING COMMITTEE SHALL BE COMPRISED OF A REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OFFICES AND DEPARTMENTS:

(A) THE DEPARTMENT.

(B) THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH.

(D) THE BUREAU OF MENTAL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH.

(E) THE FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY.

(F) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE.

(2) UPON WRITTEN OR ORAL REQUEST BY A PUPIL WHO IS AT LEAST 18 YEARS OF AGE OR A PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OF A PUPIL LESS THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE, SCHOOL OFFICIALS SHALL INFORM THE PUPIL OR PARENT, WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME AFTER THE REQUEST IS MADE, OF THE CONTENT OF A COURSE IN THE HEALTH EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND SHALL ALLOW THE PUPIL OR PARENT TO EXAMINE TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER CLASSROOM MATERIALS THAT ARE PROVIDED TO THE PUPIL OR MATERIALS THAT ARE PRESENTED TO THE PUPIL IN THE CLASSROOM. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A DISTRICT TO PERMIT PUPIL OR PARENTAL EXAMINATION OF TEST QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, SCORING KEYS, OR OTHER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENTS OR DATA USED TO ADMINISTER AN ACADEMIC EXAMINATION.

Sec. 101. (1) To be eligible to receive state aid under this act, not later than the fifth Wednesday after the pupil membership count day and not later than the fifth Wednesday after the supplemental count day, each district superintendent through the secretary of the district's board shall file with the intermediate superintendent a certified and sworn copy of the number of pupils enrolled and in regular daily attendance in the district as of the pupil membership count day and as of the supplemental count day, as applicable, for the current school year. In addition, a district maintaining school during the entire year, as provided under section 1561 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1561, shall file with the intermediate superintendent a certified and sworn copy of the number of pupils enrolled and in regular daily attendance in the district for the current school year pursuant to rules promulgated by the superintendent. Not later than the seventh Wednesday after the pupil membership count day and not later than the seventh Wednesday after the supplemental count day, the intermediate district shall transmit to the department the data filed by each of its constituent districts. If a district fails to file the sworn and certified copy with the intermediate superintendent in a timely manner, as required under this subsection, the intermediate district shall notify the department and state aid due to be distributed under this act shall be withheld from the defaulting district immediately, beginning with the next payment after the failure and continuing with each payment until the district complies with this subsection. If an intermediate district fails to transmit the data in its possession in a timely and accurate manner to the department, as required under this subsection, state aid due to be distributed under this act shall be withheld from the defaulting intermediate district immediately, beginning with the next payment after the failure and continuing with each payment until the intermediate district complies with this subsection. If a district or intermediate district does not comply with this subsection by the end of the fiscal year, the district or intermediate district forfeits the amount withheld. A person who willfully falsifies a figure or statement in the certified and sworn copy of enrollment shall be punished in the manner prescribed by section 161.

(2) To be eligible to receive state aid under this act, not later than the twenty-fourth Wednesday after the pupil membership count day and not later than the twenty-fourth Wednesday after the supplemental count day, an intermediate district shall submit to the department, in a form and manner prescribed by the department, the audited enrollment and attendance data for the pupils of its constituent districts and of the intermediate district. If an intermediate district fails to transmit the audited data as required under this subsection, state aid due to be distributed under this act shall be withheld from the defaulting intermediate district immediately, beginning with the next payment after the failure and continuing with each payment until the intermediate district complies with this subsection. If an intermediate district does not comply with this subsection by the end of the fiscal year, the intermediate district forfeits the amount withheld.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, each district shall provide at least 180 days of pupil instruction and a number of hours of pupil instruction at least equal to the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction required for 2000-2001 under section 1284 of the revised school code, MCL 380.1284. Except as otherwise provided in this act, a district failing to hold 180 days of pupil instruction shall forfeit from its total state aid allocation for each day of failure an amount equal to 1/180 of its total state aid allocation. Except as otherwise provided in this act, a district failing to comply with the required minimum hours of pupil instruction under this subsection shall forfeit from its total state aid allocation an amount determined by applying a ratio of the number of hours the district was in noncompliance in relation to the required minimum number of hours under this subsection. A district failing to meet both the 180 days of pupil instruction requirement and the minimum number of hours of pupil instruction requirement under this subsection shall be penalized only the higher of the 2 amounts calculated under the forfeiture provisions of this subsection. Not later than August 1, the board of each district shall certify to the department the number of days and hours of pupil instruction in the previous school year. If the district did not hold at least 180 days and the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction under this subsection, the deduction of state aid shall be made in the following fiscal year from the first payment of state school aid. A district is not subject to forfeiture of funds under this subsection for a fiscal year in which a forfeiture was already imposed under subsection (7). Days or hours lost because of strikes or teachers' conferences shall not be counted as days or hours of pupil instruction. A district not having at least 75% of the district's membership in attendance on any day of pupil instruction shall receive state aid in that proportion of 1/180 that the actual percent of attendance bears to the specified percentage. The superintendent shall promulgate rules for the implementation of this subsection.

(4) The first 2 days for which pupil instruction is not provided because of conditions not within the control of school authorities, such as severe storms, fires, epidemics, or health conditions as defined by the city, county, or state health authorities, shall be counted as days of pupil instruction. Subsequent such days shall not be counted as days of pupil instruction.

(5) A district shall not forfeit part of its state aid appropriation because it adopts or has in existence an alternative scheduling program for pupils in kindergarten if the program provides at least the number of hours required under subsection (3) for a full-time equated membership for a pupil in kindergarten as provided under section 6(4).

(6) Upon application by the district for a particular fiscal year, the superintendent may waive the minimum number of days of pupil instruction requirement of subsection (3) for a district if the district has adopted an experimental school year schedule in 1 or more buildings in the district if the experimental school year schedule provides the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction under subsection (3) or more and is consistent with all state board policies on school improvement and restructuring. If a district applies for and receives a waiver under this subsection and complies with the terms of the waiver, for the fiscal year covered by the waiver the district is not subject to forfeiture under this section of part of its state aid allocation for the specific building or program covered by the waiver.

(7) Not later than April 15 of each fiscal year, the board of each district shall certify to the department the planned number of days and hours of pupil instruction in the district for the school year ending in the fiscal year. In addition to any other penalty or forfeiture under this section, if at any time the department determines that 1 or more of the following has occurred in a district, the district shall forfeit in the current fiscal year beginning in the next payment to be calculated by the department a proportion of the funds due to the district under this act that is equal to the proportion below 180 days and the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction under subsection (3), as specified in the following:

(a) The district fails to operate its schools for at least 180 days and the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction under subsection (3) in a school year, including days counted under subsection (4).

(b) The board of the district takes formal action not to operate its schools for at least 180 days and the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction under subsection (3) in a school year, including days counted under subsection (4).

(8) In providing the minimum number of hours of pupil instruction required under subsection (3), a district shall use the following guidelines, and a district shall maintain records to substantiate its compliance with the following guidelines:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a pupil must be scheduled for at least the required minimum number of hours of instruction, excluding study halls, or at least the sum of 90 hours plus the required minimum number of hours of instruction, including up to 2 study halls.

(b) The time a pupil is assigned to any tutorial activity in a block schedule may be considered instructional time, unless that time is determined in an audit to be a study hall period.

(c) A pupil in grades 9 to 12 for whom a reduced schedule is determined to be in the individual pupil's best educational interest must be scheduled for a number of hours equal to at least 80% of the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction to be considered a full-time equivalent pupil.

(d) If a pupil in grades 9 to 12 who is enrolled in a cooperative education program or a special education pupil cannot receive the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction solely because of travel time between instructional sites during the school day, that travel time, up to a maximum of ~~2-1/2~~ 3 hours per school week, shall be considered to be pupil instruction time for the purpose of determining whether the pupil is receiving the required minimum number of hours of pupil instruction. However, if a district demonstrates to the satisfaction of the department that the travel time limitation under this subdivision would create undue costs or hardship to the district, the department may consider more travel time to be pupil instruction time for this purpose.

(9) The department shall apply the guidelines under subsection (8) in calculating the full-time equivalency of pupils.

(10) Upon application by the district for a particular fiscal year, the superintendent may waive for a district the 180 days or minimum number of hours of pupil instruction requirement of subsection (3) for a department-approved alternative education program. If a district applies for and receives a waiver under this subsection and complies with the terms of the waiver, for the fiscal year covered by the waiver the district is not subject to forfeiture under this section for the specific program covered by the waiver.

(11) Beginning in 2000-2001, a district may count up to 51 hours of professional development for teachers as hours of pupil instruction. A district that elects to use this exception shall notify the department of its election.

Sec. 105. (1) In order to avoid a penalty under this section, and in order to count a nonresident pupil residing within the same intermediate district in membership without the approval of the pupil's district of residence, a district shall comply with this section.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a district shall determine whether or not it will accept applications for enrollment by nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district for the next school year. If the district determines to accept applications for enrollment of a number of nonresidents, beyond those entitled to preference under this section, the district shall use the following procedures for accepting applications from and enrolling nonresidents:

(a) The district shall publish the grades, schools, and special programs, if any, for which enrollment may be available to, and for which applications will be accepted from, nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district.

(b) If the district has a limited number of positions available for nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district in a grade, school, or program, all of the following apply to accepting applications for and enrollment of nonresidents in that grade, school, or program:

(i) The district shall do all of the following not later than the second Friday in August:

(A) Provide notice to the general public that applications will be taken for a 15-day period from nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district for enrollment in that grade, school, or program. The notice shall identify the 15-day period and the place and manner for submitting applications.

(B) During the application period under sub-subparagraph (A), accept applications from nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district for enrollment in that grade, school, or program.

(C) Within 15 days after the end of the application period under sub-subparagraph (A), using the procedures and preferences required under this section, determine which nonresident applicants will be allowed to enroll in that grade, school, or program, using the random draw system required under subsection (13) as necessary, and notify the parent or legal guardian of each nonresident applicant of whether or not the applicant may enroll in the district. The notification to parents or legal guardians of nonresident applicants accepted for enrollment shall contain notification of the date by which the applicant must enroll in the district and procedures for enrollment.

(ii) Beginning on the third Monday in August and not later than the end of the first week of school, if any positions become available in a grade, school, or program due to accepted applicants failing to enroll or to more positions being added, the district may enroll nonresident applicants from the waiting list maintained under subsection (13), offering enrollment in the order that applicants appear on the waiting list. If there are still positions available after enrolling all applicants from the waiting list who desire to enroll, the district may not fill those positions until the second semester enrollment under subsection (3), as provided under that subsection, or until the next school year.

(c) For a grade, school, or program that has an unlimited number of positions available for nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district, all of the following apply to enrollment of nonresidents in that grade, school, or program:

(i) The district may accept applications for enrollment in that grade, school, or program, and may enroll nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district in that grade, school, or program, until the end of the first week of school. The district shall provide notice to the general public of the place and manner for submitting applications and, if the district has a limited application period, the notice shall include the dates of the application period. The application period shall be at least a 15-day period.

(ii) Not later than the end of the first week of school, the district shall notify the parent or legal guardian of each nonresident applicant who is accepted for enrollment that the applicant has been accepted for enrollment in the grade, school, or program and of the date by which the applicant must enroll in the district and the procedures for enrollment.

(3) If a district determines during the first semester of a school year that it has positions available for enrollment of a number of nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district, beyond those entitled to preference under this section, for the second semester of the school year, the district may accept applications from and enroll nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district for the second semester using the following procedures:

(a) Not later than 2 weeks before the end of the first semester, the district shall publish the grades, schools, and special programs, if any, for which enrollment for the second semester may be available to, and for which applications will be accepted from, nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district.

(b) During the last 2 weeks of the first semester, the district shall accept applications from nonresidents residing within the same intermediate district for enrollment for the second semester in the available grades, schools, and programs.

(c) By the beginning of the second semester, using the procedures and preferences required under this section, the district shall determine which nonresident applicants will be allowed to enroll in the district for the second semester and notify the parent or legal guardian of each nonresident applicant residing within the same intermediate district of whether or not the applicant may enroll in the district. The notification to parents or legal guardians of nonresident applicants accepted for enrollment shall contain notification of the date by which the applicant must enroll in the district and procedures for enrollment.

(4) If deadlines similar to those described in subsection (2) or (3) have been established in an intermediate district, and if those deadlines are not later than the deadlines under subsection (2) or (3), the districts within the intermediate district may use those deadlines.

(5) A district offering to enroll nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district may limit the number of nonresident pupils it accepts in a grade, school, or program, at its discretion, and may use that limit as the reason for refusal to enroll an applicant.

(6) A nonresident applicant residing within the same intermediate district shall not be granted or refused enrollment based on intellectual, academic, artistic, or other ability, talent, or accomplishment, or lack thereof, or based on a mental or physical disability, except that a district may refuse to admit a nonresident applicant if the applicant does not meet the same criteria, other than residence, that an applicant who is a resident of the district must meet to be accepted for enrollment in a grade or a specialized, magnet, or intra-district choice school or program to which the applicant applies.

(7) A nonresident applicant residing within the same intermediate district shall not be granted or refused enrollment based on age, except that a district may refuse to admit a nonresident applicant applying for a program that is not appropriate for the age of the applicant.

(8) A nonresident applicant residing within the same intermediate district shall not be granted or refused enrollment based upon religion, race, color, national origin, sex, height, weight, marital status, or athletic ability, or, generally, in violation of any state or federal law prohibiting discrimination.

(9) A district may refuse to enroll a nonresident applicant if the applicant is, or has been within the preceding 2 years, suspended from another school or if the applicant has ever been expelled from another school.

(10) A district shall continue to allow a pupil who was enrolled in and attended the district under this section in the school year or semester immediately preceding the school year or semester in question to enroll in the district until the pupil graduates from high school. This subsection does not prohibit a district from expelling a pupil described in this subsection for disciplinary reasons.

(11) A district shall give preference for enrollment under this section over all other nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district to other school-age children who reside in the same household as a pupil described in subsection (10).

(12) If a nonresident pupil was enrolled in and attending school in a district as a nonresident pupil in the 1995-96 school year and continues to be enrolled continuously each school year in that district, the district shall allow that nonresident pupil to continue to enroll in and attend school in the district until high school graduation, without requiring the nonresident pupil to apply for enrollment under this section. This subsection does not prohibit a district from expelling a pupil described in this subsection for disciplinary reasons.

(13) If the number of qualified nonresident applicants eligible for acceptance in a school, grade, or program does not exceed the positions available for nonresident pupils in the school, grade, or program, the school district shall accept for enrollment all of the qualified nonresident applicants eligible for acceptance. If the number of qualified nonresident applicants residing within the same intermediate district eligible for acceptance exceeds the positions available in a grade, school, or program in a district for nonresident pupils, the district shall use a random draw system, subject to the need to abide by state and federal antidiscrimination laws and court orders and subject to preferences allowed by this section. The district shall develop and maintain a waiting list based on the order in which nonresident applicants were drawn under this random draw system.

(14) If a district, or the nonresident applicant, requests the district in which a nonresident applicant resides to supply information needed by the district for evaluating the applicant's application for enrollment or for enrolling the applicant, the district of residence shall provide that information on a timely basis.

(15) If a district is subject to a court-ordered desegregation plan, and if the court issues an order prohibiting pupils residing in that district from enrolling in another district or prohibiting pupils residing in another district from enrolling in that district, this section is subject to the court order.

(16) This section does not require a district to provide transportation for a nonresident pupil enrolled in the district under this section or for a resident pupil enrolled in another district under this section. However, at the time a nonresident pupil enrolls in the district, a district shall provide to the pupil's parent or legal guardian information on available transportation to and from the school in which the pupil enrolls.

(17) If ~~, in a particular state fiscal year,~~ the total number of pupils enrolled and counted in membership in a district FOR 2001-2002 is less than 90% of the total number of pupils residing in the district who are enrolled and counted in membership in either that district or 1 or more other districts FOR 2001-2002, the total amount of money allocated to that district FOR 2001-2002 under ~~section 20~~ SECTIONS 22A AND 22B shall be adjusted so that the district receives a total allocation under ~~section 20~~ THOSE SECTIONS equal to the amount the district would receive under ~~section 20~~ THOSE SECTIONS if exactly 90% of the pupils residing in the district who are enrolled and counted in either that district or 1 or more other districts were enrolled and counted in membership in that district.

(18) BEGINNING IN 2002-2003, IF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP IN A DISTRICT FOR A FISCAL YEAR IS LESS THAN 90% OF THE SUM OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS RESIDING IN THE DISTRICT WHO ARE ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FISCAL YEAR IN THAT DISTRICT PLUS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS RESIDING IN THAT DISTRICT WHO ARE ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FISCAL YEAR IN 1 OR MORE OTHER DISTRICTS UNDER THIS SECTION OR SECTION 105C, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CALCULATE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WOULD BE ALLOCATED TO THAT DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR UNDER SECTIONS 22A AND 22B IF EXACTLY 90% OF THE SUM OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS RESIDING IN THE DISTRICT WHO ARE ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FISCAL YEAR IN THAT DISTRICT PLUS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS RESIDING IN THAT DISTRICT WHO ARE ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FISCAL YEAR IN 1 OR MORE OTHER DISTRICTS UNDER THIS SECTION OR SECTION 105C WERE ENROLLED AND COUNTED IN MEMBERSHIP IN THAT DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL USE THIS CALCULATION TO CALCULATE A PAYMENT UNDER SUBSECTION (19).

(19) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (20), BEGINNING IN 2002-2003, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE A PAYMENT TO A DISTRICT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (18) IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO A PERCENTAGE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY THE DISTRICT WOULD RECEIVE UNDER SECTIONS 22A AND 22B FOR THE PARTICULAR FISCAL YEAR AS OTHERWISE CALCULATED UNDER THIS ACT AND THE AMOUNT CALCULATED UNDER SUBSECTION (18). THIS PERCENTAGE IS AS FOLLOWS:

(A) FOR 2002-2003, 75%.

(B) FOR 2003-2004, 50%.

(D) FOR 2005-2006 AND SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEARS, 0%.

(20) A DISTRICT IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A PAYMENT UNDER SUBSECTION (19) IF THE DISTRICT RECEIVES ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE APPLICABLE FISCAL YEAR DUE TO THE MEMBERSHIP CALCULATION UNDER SECTION 6(4)(Y).

(21) ~~(18)~~ A district may participate in a cooperative education program with 1 or more other districts or intermediate districts whether or not the district enrolls any nonresidents pursuant to this section.

(22) ~~(19)~~ A district that, pursuant to this section, enrolls a nonresident pupil who is eligible for special education programs and services according to statute or rule, or who is a child with disabilities, as defined under the individuals with disabilities education act, title VI of Public Law 91-230, shall be considered to be the resident district of the pupil for the purpose of providing the pupil with a free appropriate public education. Consistent with state and federal law, that district is responsible for developing and implementing an individualized education plan annually for a nonresident pupil described in this subsection.

(23) ~~(20)~~ If a district does not comply with this section, the district forfeits 5% of the total state school aid allocation to the district under this act.

(24) ~~(21)~~ Upon application by a district, the superintendent may grant a waiver for the district from a specific requirement under this section for not more than 1 year.

Sec. 107. (1) From the appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~an amount not to exceed $80,000,000.00 for 2000-2001 and~~ an amount not to exceed $75,000,000.00 ~~each fiscal year~~ for 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $77,500,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 for adult education programs authorized under this section.

(2) To be eligible to be a participant funded under this section, a person shall be enrolled in an adult basic education program, an adult English as a second language program, a general education development (G.E.D.) test preparation program, a job or employment related program, or a high school completion program, that meets the requirements of this section, and shall meet either of the following, as applicable:

(a) If the individual has obtained a high school diploma or a general education development (G.E.D.) certificate, the individual meets 1 of the following:

(i) Is less than 20 years of age on September 1 of the school year and is enrolled in the state technical institute and rehabilitation center.

(ii) Is less than 20 years of age on September 1 of the school year, is not attending an institution of higher education, and is enrolled in a job or employment-related program through a referral by an employer.

(iii) Is enrolled in an English as a second language program.

(iv) Is enrolled in a high school completion program.

(b) If the individual has not obtained a high school diploma or G.E.D. certificate, is at least 20 years of age on September 1 of the school year.

(3) The amount allocated under subsection (1) shall be distributed as follows:

(a) For districts and consortia that received payments for 1995-96 under former section 107f and that received payments for 1996-97 under subsection (4) of this section as in effect in 1996-97, the amount allocated to each ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 shall be an amount each fiscal year equal to 36.76% of the amount the district or consortium received for 1995-96 under former section 107f.

(b) For districts and consortia that received payments under subsection (3) of this section as in effect for 1996-97, the amount allocated to each ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , AND FOR 2002-2003 shall be an amount each fiscal year equal to the product of the number of full-time equated participants actually enrolled and in attendance during the 1996-97 school fiscal year in the program funded under subsection (3) of this section as in effect for 1996-97 as reported to the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, audited, and adjusted according to subsection (10) of this section as in effect for 1996-97, multiplied by $2,750.00.

(c) For districts and consortia that meet the conditions of both subdivisions (a) and (b), the amount allocated each fiscal year ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and for 2002-2003 shall be the sum of the allocations to the district or consortium under subdivisions (a) and (b).

(d) A district or consortium that received funding in 1996-97 under this section as in effect for 1996-97 may operate independently of a consortium or join or form a consortium ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , or for 2002-2003. The allocation ~~for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , or for 2002-2003 to the district or the newly formed consortium under this subsection shall be determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT and shall be based on the proportion of the amounts specified in subdivision (a) or (b), or both, that are attributable to the district or consortium that received funding in 1996-97. A district or consortium described in this subdivision shall notify the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT of its intention with regard to ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , or 2002-2003 by October 1 of the affected fiscal year.

(4) A district that operated an adult education program in 1996-97 and does not intend to operate a program in ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , or 2002-2003 shall notify the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT by October 1 of the affected fiscal year of its intention. The funds intended to be allocated under this section to a district that does not operate a program in ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , or 2002-2003 and the unspent funds originally allocated under this section to a district or consortium that subsequently operates a program at less than the level of funding allocated under subsection (3) shall instead be proportionately reallocated to the other districts described in subsection (3)(a) that are operating an adult education program in ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , or 2002-2003 under this section.

(5) The amount allocated under this section per full-time equated participant is $2,850.00 for a 450-hour program. The amount shall be proportionately reduced for a program offering less than 450 hours of instruction.

(6) An adult basic education program or an adult English as a second language program operated on a year-round or school year basis may be funded under this section, subject to all of the following:

(a) The program enrolls adults who are determined by an appropriate assessment to be below ninth grade level in reading or mathematics, or both, or to lack basic English proficiency.

(b) The program tests individuals for eligibility under subdivision (a) before enrollment and tests participants to determine progress after every 90 hours of attendance, using assessment instruments approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(i) The participant's reading and mathematics proficiency are assessed at or above the ninth grade level.

(ii) The participant fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments after having completed at least 450 hours of instruction.

(d) A funding recipient enrolling a participant in an English as a second language program is eligible for funding according to subsection (10) until the participant meets 1 of the following:

(i) The participant is assessed as having attained basic English proficiency.

(ii) The participant fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments after having completed at least 450 hours of instruction. The department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT shall provide information to a funding recipient regarding appropriate assessment instruments for this program.

(7) A general education development (G.E.D.) test preparation program operated on a year-round or school year basis may be funded under this section, subject to all of the following:

(a) The program enrolls adults who do not have a high school diploma.

(b) The program shall administer a G.E.D. pre-test approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT before enrolling an individual to determine the individual's potential for success on the G.E.D. test, and shall administer other tests after every 90 hours of attendance to determine a participant's readiness to take the G.E.D. test.

(c) A funding recipient shall receive funding according to subsection (10) for a participant, and a participant may be enrolled in the program until 1 of the following occurs:

(i) The participant passes the G.E.D. test.

(ii) The participant fails to show progress on 2 successive tests used to determine readiness to take the G.E.D. test after having completed at least 450 hours of instruction.

(8) A high school completion program operated on a year-round or school year basis may be funded under this section, subject to all of the following:

(a) The program enrolls adults who do not have a high school diploma.

(b) A funding recipient shall receive funding according to subsection (10) for a participant in a course offered under this subsection until 1 of the following occurs:

(i) The participant passes the course and earns a high school diploma.

(ii) The participant fails to earn credit in 2 successive semesters or terms in which the participant is enrolled after having completed at least 900 hours of instruction.

(9) A job or employment-related adult education program operated on a year-round or school year basis may be funded under this section, subject to all of the following:

(a) The program enrolls adults referred by their employer who are less than 20 years of age, have a high school diploma, are determined to be in need of remedial mathematics or communication arts skills and are not attending an institution of higher education.

(b) An individual may be enrolled in this program and the grant recipient shall receive funding according to subsection (10) until 1 of the following occurs:

(i) The individual achieves the requisite skills as determined by appropriate assessment instruments administered at least after every 90 hours of attendance.

(ii) The individual fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments after having completed at least 450 hours of instruction. The department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT shall provide information to a funding recipient regarding appropriate assessment instruments for this program.

(10) A funding recipient shall receive payments under this section in accordance with the following:

(a) Ninety percent for enrollment of eligible participants.

(b) Ten percent for completion of the adult basic education objectives by achieving an increase of at least 1 grade level of proficiency in reading or mathematics; for achieving basic English proficiency; for passage of the G.E.D. test; for passage of a course required for a participant to attain a high school diploma; or for completion of the course and demonstrated proficiency in the academic skills to be learned in the course, as applicable.

(11) As used in this section, "participant" means the sum of the number of full-time equated individuals enrolled in and attending a department-approved adult education program under this section, using quarterly participant count days on the schedule described in section 6(7)(b).

(12) A person who is not eligible to be a participant funded under this section may receive adult education services upon the payment of tuition. In addition, a person who is not eligible to be served in a program under this section due to the program limitations specified in subsection (6), (7), (8), or (9) may continue to receive adult education services in that program upon the payment of tuition. The tuition level shall be determined by the local or intermediate district conducting the program.

(13) An individual who is an inmate in a state correctional facility shall not be counted as a participant under this section.

(14) A district shall not commingle money received under this section or from another source for adult education purposes with any other funds of the district. A district receiving adult education funds shall establish a separate ledger account for those funds. This subsection does not prohibit a district from using general funds of the district to support an adult education or community education program.

(15) The department shall work with the department of education to ensure that this section is administered in the same manner as in 1998-99.

~~(16) As used in this section and section 108, "department" means the department of career development.~~

Sec. 108. (1) From the general fund appropriation in section 11, there is allocated ~~for 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003~~ an amount not to exceed $20,000,000.00 ~~each fiscal year~~ FOR 2001-2002 AND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $20,000,000.00 FOR 2002-2003 for partnership for adult learning programs authorized under this section.

(2) To be eligible to be enrolled as a participant in an adult learning program funded under this section, a person shall be at least 16 years of age as of September 1 of the immediately preceding state fiscal year and shall meet the following, as applicable:

(a) If the individual has obtained a high school diploma or a general education development (G.E.D.) certificate, the individual is determined to have English language proficiency, reading, writing, or math skills below workforce readiness standards as determined by ~~department-approved~~ tests APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT and is not enrolled in a postsecondary institution. An individual who has obtained a high school diploma is not eligible for enrollment in a G.E.D. test preparation program funded under this section.

(b) If the individual has not obtained a high school diploma or a G.E.D. certificate, the individual has not attended a secondary institution for at least 6 months before enrollment in an adult learning program funded under this section and is not enrolled in a postsecondary institution.

(3) From the allocation under subsection (1), an amount not to exceed $19,800,000.00 is allocated ~~each fiscal year for 2000-2001,~~ for 2001-2002 , and AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $19,800,000.00 IS ALLOCATED for 2002-2003 to local workforce development boards for the purpose of providing regional adult learning programs. An application for a grant under this subsection shall be in the form and manner prescribed by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. Subject to subsections (4), (5), and (6), the amount allocated to each local workforce development board shall be as provided in this subsection, except that an eligible local workforce development board shall not receive an initial allocation under this section that is less than $70,000.00. The maximum amount of a grant awarded to an eligible local workforce development board shall be the sum of the following components:

(a) Thirty-four percent of the allocation under this subsection multiplied by the proportion of the family independence agency caseload in the local workforce development board region to the statewide family independence agency caseload.

(b) Thirty-three percent of the allocation under this subsection multiplied by the proportion of the number of persons in the local workforce development board region over age 17 who have not received a high school diploma compared to the statewide total of persons over age 17 who have not received a high school diploma.

(c) Thirty-three percent of the allocation under this subsection multiplied by the proportion of the number of persons in the local workforce development board region over age 17 for whom English is not a primary language compared to the statewide total of persons over age 17 for whom English is not a primary language.

(4) The amount of a grant to a local workforce development board under subsection (3) shall not exceed the cost for adult learning programs needed in the local workforce development board region, as documented in a manner approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(5) Not more than 9% of a grant awarded to a local workforce development board may be used for program administration, including contracting for the provision of career and educational information, counseling services, and assessment services.

(6) In order to receive funds under this section, a local workforce development board shall comply with the following requirements in a manner approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT:

(a) The local workforce development board shall document the need for adult learning programs in the local workforce development region.

(b) The local workforce development board shall report participant outcomes and other measurements of program performance.

(c) The local workforce development board shall develop a strategic plan that incorporates adult learning programs in the region. ~~Beginning in 2001-2002, a~~ A local workforce development board is not eligible for state funds under this section without a ~~department-approved~~ strategic plan APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(d) The local workforce development board shall furnish to the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, in a form and manner determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, the information the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT determines is necessary to administer this section.

(e) The local workforce development board shall allow access for the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT or ~~the department's~~ ITS designee to audit all records related to adult learning programs for which it receives funds. The local workforce development board shall reimburse this state for all disallowances found in the audit in a manner determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(7) Local workforce development boards shall distribute funds to eligible adult learning providers as follows:

(a) Not less than 85% of a grant award shall be used to support programs that improve reading, writing, and math skills to workforce readiness standards; English as a second language programs; G.E.D. preparation programs; high school completion programs; or workforce readiness programs in the local workforce development board region. These programs may include the provision of career and educational information, counseling services, and assessment services.

(b) Up to 15% of a grant award may be used to support workforce readiness programs for employers in the local workforce development board region as approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. Employers or consortia of employers whose employees participate in these programs must provide matching funds in a ratio of at least $1.00 of private funds for each $1.00 of state funds.

(8) Local workforce development boards shall award competitive grants to eligible adult learning providers for the purpose of providing adult learning programs in the local workforce development board region. Applications shall be in a form and manner prescribed by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT. In awarding grants, local workforce development boards shall consider all of the following:

(a) The ability of the provider to assess individuals before enrollment using ~~department-approved~~ assessment tools APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT and to develop individual adult learner plans from those assessments for each participant.

(b) The ability of the provider to conduct continuing assessments in a manner approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT to determine participant progress toward achieving the goals established in individual adult learner plans.

(c) The past effectiveness of an eligible provider in improving adult literacy skills and ~~, beginning in 2001-2002,~~ the success of an eligible provider in meeting or exceeding ~~department-approved~~ performance measures APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(d) Whether the program is of sufficient intensity and duration for participants to achieve substantial learning gains.

(e) Whether the program uses research-based instructional practices that have proven to be effective in teaching adult learners.

(f) Whether the program uses advances in technology, as appropriate, including computers.

(g) Whether the programs are staffed by well-trained teachers, counselors, and administrators.

(h) Whether the activities coordinate with other available resources in the community, such as schools, postsecondary institutions, job training programs, and social service agencies.

(i) Whether the provider offers flexible schedules and support services, such as child care and transportation, that enable participants, including individuals with disabilities or other special needs, to attend and complete programs.

(j) Whether the provider offers adequate job and postsecondary education counseling services.

(k) Whether the provider can maintain an information management system that has the capacity to report participant outcomes and monitor program performance against ~~department-approved~~ performance measures APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(l) Whether the provider will allow access for the local workforce development board or its designee to audit all records related to adult learning programs for which it receives funds. The adult learning provider shall reimburse the local workforce development board for all disallowances found in the audit.

(m) The cost per participant contact hour or unit of measurable outcome for each type of adult learning program for which the provider is applying.

(9) ~~Beginning in 2001-2002, contracts~~ CONTRACTS awarded by local workforce development boards to adult learning providers shall comply with the priorities established in a ~~department-approved~~ strategic plan APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(10) Adult learning providers that do not agree with the decisions of the local workforce development board in issuing or administering competitive grants may use the grievance procedure established by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(11) Local workforce development boards shall reimburse eligible adult learning providers under this section as follows:

(a) For a first-time provider, as follows:

(i) Fifty percent of the contract amount shall be allocated to eligible adult learning providers based upon enrollment of participants in adult learning programs. "Enrollment" means a participant enrolled in the program who received a preenrollment assessment using ~~department-approved~~ assessment tools APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT and for whom an individual adult learner plan has been developed.

(ii) Fifty percent of the contract amount shall be allocated to eligible adult learning providers based upon the following performance standards as measured in a ~~department-approved~~ manner APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT:

(A) The percentage of participants taking both a pretest and a posttest in English language proficiency, reading, writing, and math.

(B) The percentage of participants showing improvement toward goals identified in their individual adult learner plan.

(b) ~~Beginning in 2001-2002, eligible~~ ELIGIBLE providers that have provided adult learning programs previously under this section shall be reimbursed 100% of the contract amount based upon the performance standards in subdivision (a)(ii) as measured in a manner determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(c) A provider is eligible for reimbursement for a participant in an adult learning program until the participant's reading, writing, or math proficiency, as applicable, is assessed at workforce readiness levels or the participant fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments as determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(d) A provider is eligible for reimbursement for a participant in an English as a second language program until the participant is assessed as having attained basic English proficiency or the participant fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments as determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(e) A provider is eligible for reimbursement for a participant in a G.E.D. test preparation program until the participant passes the G.E.D. test or the participant fails to show progress on 2 successive assessments as determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(f) A provider is eligible for reimbursement for a participant in a high school completion program until the participant earns a high school diploma or the participant fails to show progress as determined by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(12) A person who is not eligible to be a participant funded under this section may receive adult learning services upon the payment of tuition or fees for service. The tuition or fee level shall be determined by the adult learning provider and approved by the local workforce development board.

(13) Adult learning providers may collect refundable deposits from participants for the use of reusable equipment and supplies and may provide incentives for program completion.

(14) A provider shall not be reimbursed under this section for an individual who is an inmate in a state correctional facility.

(15) In order to administer the partnership for adult learning system under this section, the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT shall do all of the following:

(a) Develop and provide guidelines to local workforce development boards for the development of strategic plans that incorporate adult learning.

(b) Develop and provide adult learning minimum program performance standards to be implemented by local workforce development boards.

(c) Identify approved assessment tools for assessing a participant's English language proficiency, reading, math, and writing skills.

(d) Approve workforce readiness standards for English language proficiency, reading, math, and writing skills that can be measured by ~~department-approved,~~ nationally recognized assessment tools APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

(16) Of the amount allocated in subsection (1), up to $200,000.00 is allocated to the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT for the development and administration of a standardized data collection system. ~~Beginning in 2001-2002, local~~ LOCAL workforce development boards and adult learning providers receiving funding under this section shall use the standardized data collection system for enrolling participants in adult learning programs, tracking participant progress, reporting participant outcomes, and reporting other performance measures.

(17) A provider is not required to use certificated teachers or certificated counselors to provide instructional and counseling services in a program funded under this section.

(18) As used in this section:

(a) "Adult education", for the purposes of complying with section 3 of article VIII of the state constitution of 1963, means a high school pupil receiving educational services in a nontraditional setting from a district or intermediate district in order to receive a high school diploma.

(b) "Adult learning program" means a ~~department-approved~~ program APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT that improves reading, writing, and math skills to workforce readiness standards; an English as a second language program; a G.E.D. preparation program; a high school completion program; or a workforce readiness program that enhances employment opportunities.

~~(c) "Department" means the department of career development.~~

(C) ~~(d)~~ "Eligible adult learning provider" means a district, public school academy, intermediate district, community college, university, community-based organization, or other organization approved by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT that provides adult learning programs under a contract with a local workforce development board.

(D) ~~(e)~~ "Participant" means an individual enrolled in an adult learning program and receiving services from an eligible adult learning provider.

(E) ~~(f)~~ "Strategic plan" means a ~~department-approved~~ document APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT that incorporates adult learning goals and objectives for the local workforce development board region and is developed jointly by the local workforce development board and the education advisory groups.

(h) "Workforce readiness standard" means a ~~department-approved level of~~ PROFICIENCY LEVEL APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN English language, reading, writing, or mathematics, ~~proficiency,~~ or any and all of these, as determined by results from assessments approved for use by the department OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT.

SEC. 121A. FROM THE GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION IN SECTION 11, THERE IS ALLOCATED FOR 2002-2003 ONLY AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,600,000.00 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY FOR PAYMENTS TO LOCAL TREASURERS FOR THE COSTS OF CHANGING THE COLLECTION DATE FOR THE STATE EDUCATION TAX UNDER THE STATE EDUCATION TAX ACT, 1993 PA 331, MCL 211.901 TO 211.906. ELIGIBLE COSTS TO BE REIMBURSED AND THE MANNER OF REIMBURSEMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY.

Sec. 147. (1) The allocations for ~~2000-2001,~~ 2001-2002 , and 2002-2003 for the public school employees' retirement system pursuant to the public school employees retirement act of 1979, 1980 PA 300, MCL 38.1301 to 38.1408, shall be made using the entry age normal cost actuarial method and risk assumptions adopted by the public school employees retirement board and the department of management and budget. The annual level percentage of payroll contribution rate ~~for the 2000-2001 state fiscal year is estimated at 12.16% and the annual level percentage of payroll contribution rate for the 2001-2002 state fiscal year~~ is estimated at 12.17% FOR THE 2001-2002 STATE FISCAL YEAR AND AT 12.99% FOR THE 2002-2003 STATE FISCAL YEAR. The portion of the contribution rate assigned to districts and intermediate districts for each fiscal year is all of the total percentage points. This contribution rate reflects an amortization period of ~~36 years for 2000-2001 and~~ 35 years for 2001-2002 AND 34 YEARS FOR 2002-2003. The public school employees' retirement system board shall notify each district and intermediate district by February 28 of each fiscal year of the estimated contribution rate for the next fiscal year.

(2) It is the intent of the legislature that the amortization period described in section 41(2) of the public school employees retirement act of 1979, 1980 PA 300, MCL 38.1341, be reduced to 30 years by the end of the 2005-2006 state fiscal year by reducing the amortization period by not more than 1 year each fiscal year.

Enacting section 1. In accordance with section 30 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963, total state spending in this amendatory act and in 2001 PA 121 and 2000 PA 297 from state sources for fiscal year 2001-2002 is estimated at $11,220,561,700.00 and state appropriations to be paid to local units of government for fiscal year 2001-2002 are estimated at $11,181,789,800.00; and total state spending in this amendatory act and in 2001 PA 121 and 2000 PA 297 from state sources for fiscal year 2002-2003 is estimated at $11,472,054,900.00 and state appropriations to be paid to local units of government for fiscal year 2002-2003 are estimated at $11,420,969,500.00.

Enacting section 2. (1) Sections 32g, 32h, 63, 95, 97, and 166d of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1632g, 388.1632h, 388.1663, 388.1695, 388.1697, and 388.1766d, are repealed.

(2) Sections 22c, 32e, and 33 of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1622c, 388.1632e, and 388.1633, are repealed effective October 1, 2002.

Enacting section 3. Section 19 of the state school aid act of 1979, 1979 PA 94, MCL 388.1619, as amended by this amendatory act, takes effect October 1, 2002.

Second: That the Senate and House agree to the title of the bill to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1979 PA 94, entitled "An act to make appropriations to aid in the support of the public schools and the intermediate school districts of the state; to make appropriations for certain other purposes relating to education; to provide for the disbursement of the appropriations; to supplement the school aid fund by the levy and collection of certain taxes; to authorize the issuance of certain bonds and provide for the security of those bonds; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments, the state board of education, and certain other boards and officials; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal acts and parts of acts," by amending sections 6, 11, 11f, 11g, 19, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 32f, 37, 38, 39, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 96, 98, 99, 101, 105, 107, 108, and 147 (MCL 388.1606, 388.1611, 388.1611f, 388.1611g, 388.1619, 388.1620, 388.1622a, 388.1622b, 388.1624, 388.1626a, 388.1631a, 388.1631d, 388.1632a, 388.1632b, 388.1632c, 388.1632d, 388.1632f, 388.1637, 388.1638, 388.1639, 388.1641, 388.1651a, 388.1651c, 388.1653a, 388.1654, 388.1656, 388.1657, 388.1661a, 388.1662, 388.1667, 388.1668, 388.1674, 388.1681, 388.1694, 388.1694a, 388.1696, 388.1698, 388.1699, 388.1701, 388.1705, 388.1707, 388.1708, and 388.1747), sections 6, 11, 11f, 11g, 20, 22a, 22b, 24, 26a, 31a, 31d, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 32f, 41, 51a, 51c, 53a, 54, 56, 57, 61a, 62, 67, 68, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 98, 99, 107, and 147 as amended by 2001 PA 121 and sections 19, 37, 38, 39, 101, and 105 as amended and sections 96 and 108 as added by 2000 PA 297, and by adding sections 8b, 8c, 11j, 32i, 39a, 51d, 55, 99a, and 121a; and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

Leon Stille

Dan L. DeGrow

Kenneth DeBeaussaert

Conferees for the Senate

Ron Jelinek

Rick Johnson

Conferees for the House

The Speaker announced that under Joint Rule 9 the conference report would lie over one day.

Rep. Richardville moved pursuant to Joint Rule 9, that the Journal printing requirement be suspended, printed copies of the conference report having been placed on the members' desks.

The motion prevailed.

The question being on the adoption of the conference report,

______

Rep. Jacobs moved that Reps. Daniels, Lemmons, Mans, Quarles, Rison and Wojno be excused temporarily from today's session.

The motion prevailed.

Point of Order

Rep. Thomas requested a ruling of the Chair regarding whether the conference report is properly before the House.

The Chair ruled that the conference report is properly before the House.

Rep. Thomas appealed the decision of the Chair.

The question being, "Shall the judgment of the Chair stand as the judgment of the House?"

The judgment of the Chair stood as the judgment of the House, a majority of the members present and voting, voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 459 Yeas--56

Allen Gilbert Kuipers Rocca

Birkholz Gosselin LaSata Scranton

Bisbee Hager Mead Shackleton

Bishop Hart Meyer Shulman

Brown, C. Howell Middaugh Stamas

Cassis Hummel Mortimer Stewart

Caul Jansen Newell Tabor

DeRossett Jelinek Palmer Toy

DeVuyst Johnson, Rick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

DeWeese Johnson, Ruth Patterson Vander Roest

Drolet Julian Pumford Vander Veen

Ehardt Koetje Raczkowski Vear

Faunce Kooiman Richardville Voorhees

George Kowall Richner Woronchak

Nays--42

Adamini Dennis Minore Schermesser

Anderson Frank Murphy Sheltrown

Basham Gieleghem Neumann Spade

Bernero Hansen O'Neil Stallworth

Bogardus Hardman Pestka Switalski

Bovin Jacobs Phillips Thomas

Brown, B. Jamnick Plakas Waters

Brown, R. Kolb Reeves Williams

Callahan Lipsey Rivet Woodward

Clark, I. Lockwood Schauer Zelenko

Clarke, H. McConico

In The Chair: Ehardt

The question being on the adoption of the conference report,

The conference report was then adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 460 Yeas--75

Allen Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Anderson Gilbert Mead Schermesser

Basham Gosselin Meyer Scranton

Bernero Hager Middaugh Sheltrown

Birkholz Hart Mortimer Shulman

Bisbee Howell Murphy Spade

Bishop Hummel Neumann Stamas

Brown, B. Jacobs Newell Stewart

Brown, C. Jansen O'Neil Tabor

Cassis Jelinek Palmer Toy

Caul Johnson, Rick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

DeRossett Johnson, Ruth Patterson Vander Roest

DeVuyst Julian Pestka Vander Veen

DeWeese Koetje Phillips Vear

Drolet Kooiman Pumford Voorhees

Ehardt Kowall Raczkowski Woodward

Faunce Kuipers Richardville Woronchak

Frank LaSata Richner Zelenko

George Lipsey Rocca

Nays--26

Adamini Clarke, H. Kolb Shackleton

Bogardus Dennis McConico Stallworth

Bovin Godchaux Minore Switalski

Bradstreet Hale Plakas Thomas

Brown, R. Hansen Reeves Waters

Callahan Hardman Rivet Williams

Clark, I. Jamnick

In The Chair: Ehardt

Rep. Jamnick, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I am voting no on this bill because of several concerns.When this budget was originally adopted, the economy was doing well and school aid revenues were up. Rather than increase our investment in education or education infrastructure funding, the increased school aid revenues were used as an opportunity to take $420 million in GF/GP from this budget with the promise of restored funding in FY 2003. Due to current economic conditions, that funding was not included. The House passed version included intent language stating that in FY 2004 that funding would be restored. This conference report breaks that promise and removes the language.The current budget also includes funding grants for school districts in this state with declining pupil enrollment, including Willow Run Schools which is in the 54th District. This is a critical problem facing many districts. Unfortunately, the report limited the grants to districts in the Lower Peninsula ONLY. This arbitrary line divides the State at the Mackinaw bridge, hurting those districts in the Upper Peninsula who will no longer receive this funding.In addition, categorical funding in this budget is gutted: $45 million each from parental involvement grants and reading program funds were eliminated; $28 million in summer school funding was eliminated;and $10 million each from counseling services and professional development were eliminated. Much of this funding is targeted at at-risk students, hurting students who are in need of most assistance.This report also attempts to punish a party who may legally and rightfully choose to make use of the judicial system to enforce their rights regarding federal Title X1X Medicaid funds, in that it threatens to cut such a party's funding in the event of a court challenge. This provision appears to be vindictive. It would deprive school districts, families and children in them of these funds in violation of a fundamental provision of the Michigan Constitution which provides at Article I, Sec. 17 that 'no person shall be .... deprived of life, liberty or property, without due rocess of law.'"

Reps. Minore and Plakas, having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

While I concede that the district I currently represent, and the districts I hope in the future to represent (God willing and the voters agree) are reasonably well served by this budget bill, there are multiple reasons for voting against it.

Among other concerns, many at-risk programs have been reduced or eliminated to the detriment of children throughout the state. These include, for example: This bill eliminates reading program funding Parental Involvement grants have been eliminated Summer school funding has been eliminated Counseling services has been reduced or eliminated.

This bill moves general fund obligations into the school aid fund in the area of bonding - a modest problem in this budget that will only grow in the future, and creates a situation where operations dollars will now be diluted by the use of school aid funds for capitol expenses.

This bill treats the Upper Peninsula as a 'step child' severing it from the benefits of the declining enrollment dollars even though that change represents a genuine threat to several UP school districts.

This budget bill abandons what members understood was to be an annual grant to the Detroit Schools as part of the state take-over of that district

This bill would punish any district that sued the state to enforce certain provisions of federal or state 'promises', and --more importantly would punish all Michigan school districts if the state lost lawsuits like those that sought funding for Special Education or for Medicaid funded programs.

This budget seems to value electronic 'gimmicks' like virtual schools over 'real' schools and real children

But most importantly, the state with this and recent budgets has abandoned its committment to fund public education out of the general fund. With the adoption of Proposal A, the state promised to supplement the school-aid fund with dollars from the general fund. In the very recent past that promise has been abandoned and the roughly $400 milliion from general fund dollars that annually that was included in school funding has been 'officially' and 'finally' abandoned with this bill. This is a trend that is dangerous for public education today and for the future of public education. It is a systemic problem that represents a threat to public education that I regard as a threat to our basic democratic system."

Reps. Williams, Hansen, Clarke, Callahan, Clark, Reeves, Kolb, Hale and Hardman having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I am voting no on Senate Bill 1107 for several reasons.

First, when this budget was originally adopted, the economy was doing well and School Aid Revenues were up. Rather than increase our investment in education or education infrastructure funding, the Republicans used the increased School Aid revenues as an opportunity to take $420 million in GF/GP from this budget with the promise of restored funding in FY 2003. Due to the current budget situation, that funding was not included. The House-passed version included intent language stating that in FY 2004 that funding would be restored. This Conference Report breaks that promise and removes the language.

Furthermore, the current budget includes funding grants for school districts in this state with declining pupil enrollment. This is a critical problem facing many districts. Unfortunately, the Conference Report limited the grants to districts in the Lower Peninsula ONLY. This arbitrary line divides the State at the Mackinac bridge, hurting those districts in the Upper Peninsula who will no longer receive this funding.

In addition, categorical funding in this budget is gutted:

* Reading Program funds were eliminated ($45 million).

* Parental Involvement Grants were eliminated ($45 million).

* Summer School funding was eliminated ($28 million).

* Counseling Services was eliminated ($10 million).

* Professional Development was eliminated ($10 million).

Much of this funding is targeted at at-risk students. These cuts will hurt students who are in need of the most assistance.

When the Detroit School district was taken over by the State, there was a promise of $15 million per year for that district during the take-over period to help the schools get back on their feet. This budget eliminates that funding even though the take-over is still in effect.

Finally, this conference report attempts to punish a party who may legally and rightfully choose to make use of the judicial system to enforce their rights regarding federal Title XIX Medicaid funds, in that it threatens to cut such a party's funding in the event of a court challenge.

This provision is vindictive and strong-arming. It inappropriately attempts by state action to prevent parties from exercising their rights under federal law. But further, it would deprive school districts, families and the children in them of these funds in violation of a fundamental provision of the Michigan Constitution, which provides at Article I, Sec. 17 that 'No person shall be .... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.'

For these reasons, I am voting no on SB 1107."

Rep. Dennis, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I am voting no on Senate Bill 1107 for several reasons.

In addition, categorical funding in this budget is gutted:

* Reading Program funds were eliminated ($45 million).

* Parental Involvement Grants were eliminated ($45 million).

* Summer School funding was eliminated ($28 million).

* Counseling Services was eliminated ($10 million).

* Professional Development was eliminated ($10 million).

Much of this funding is targeted at at-risk students. These cuts will hurt students who are in need of the most assistance.

For these reasons, I am voting no on SB 1107."

Reps. Shackleton, Bovin, Rich Brown and Adamini, having reserved the right to explain their nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

The conference report before us has many good qualities. It raises the foundation grant that every school will receive to a minimum of $6700 per child. That is, indeed, good news.

But this bill has one major flaw. It does not address the problems of the many small school districts who are suffering from declining enrollment. These schools have few options and have been helped in the last few budgets with language that has allowd them to average the decline instead of stepping off a cliff. That language has been eliminated for Upper Peninsula schools. And while the concept of furthering technology in these schools is an exciting and intriguing proposal it does not assist in the basic need of keeping teachers in the schools to teach the kids. The exclusion of assistance for those schools will assuredly result in layoffs of teachers and kids in unacceptably large class sizes.

The language in the conference report regarding small declining enrollment schools is inherently unfair. While I support and am enthusiastic about the increases in this budget for all Michigan schools I cannot and will not vote for a bill that treats Upper Peninsula schools in this manner."

Rep. Bogardus, having reserved the right to explain her nay vote, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted noon Senate Bill 1170 because it is unfair and unreal. It discriminates against a group of children because they live on the wrong side of the Mackinaw bridge. Children in the upper penninsula will not be eligible for declining enrollment funds strictly because of where they live. While it proposes a foundation grant of $6700.00 per child that funding is jeopardized by language which allows litigation costs to be paid from discretionary funds. We have come through good economic times without doing anything to improve our crumbling school buildings and this budget makes it even more difficult to ever do anything because it pushes problems into future years. It does not restore the 420 million general fund dollars which were taken from the school aid fund last year or contain the language to facilitate restoring them in future years.In addition, catagorical funding is eliminated in this budget for early childhood programs which were promised by the governor in above and beyond the $6700.00 foundation grant. If these programs were important during the campaign season why are they now eliminated? Finally, the budget eliminates funding for professional development for teachers. If the legislature and administration believe in high standards for education professional development for teachers must be high on the list of priorities."

Messages from the Senate

The Speaker laid before the House

House Bill No. 5411, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled "The revised school code," by amending section 1225 (MCL 380.1225), as amended by 1997 PA 152.

(The bill was received from the Senate on March 21, with substitute (S-1), full title inserted and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until April 9, see House Journal No 28, p. 871.)

The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,

Rep. Mortimer moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-1) as follows:

1. Amend page 8, line 13, by striking out all of enacting section 1 and inserting:

"Enacting section 1. This amendatory act takes effect May 1, 2002.".

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,

The Senate substitute (S-1), as amended, was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 461 Yeas--100

Adamini Faunce Kuipers Rivet

Allen Frank LaSata Rocca

Anderson George Lipsey Schermesser

Basham Gieleghem Lockwood Scranton

Bernero Gilbert McConico Shackleton

Birkholz Godchaux Mead Sheltrown

Bisbee Gosselin Meyer Shulman

Bishop Hager Middaugh Spade

Bogardus Hale Minore Stallworth

Bovin Hansen Mortimer Stamas

Bradstreet Hardman Murphy Stewart

Brown, B. Hart Neumann Switalski

Brown, C. Howell Newell Tabor

Brown, R. Hummel O'Neil Thomas

Callahan Jacobs Palmer Toy

Cassis Jamnick Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Patterson Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Pestka Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vear

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Plakas Voorhees

DeRossett Julian Pumford Waters

DeVuyst Koetje Raczkowski Williams

DeWeese Kolb Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kowall Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

The House agreed to the full title of the bill.

The Speaker laid before the House

House Bill No. 5415, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled "The revised school code," by amending section 1356 (MCL 380.1356), as amended by 1993 PA 312.

The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,

The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 462 Yeas--99

Adamini Frank LaSata Schauer

Allen George Lipsey Schermesser

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Scranton

Basham Gilbert Mead Shackleton

Bernero Godchaux Meyer Sheltrown

Birkholz Gosselin Middaugh Shulman

Bisbee Hager Minore Spade

Bishop Hale Mortimer Stallworth

Bogardus Hansen Murphy Stamas

Bovin Hardman Neumann Stewart

Bradstreet Hart Newell Switalski

Brown, B. Howell O'Neil Tabor

Brown, C. Hummel Palmer Thomas

Brown, R. Jacobs Pappageorge Toy

Callahan Jamnick Patterson Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Pestka Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Phillips Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Plakas Vear

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Pumford Voorhees

DeRossett Julian Raczkowski Waters

DeVuyst Koetje Reeves Williams

DeWeese Kolb Richardville Woodward

Drolet Kooiman Richner Woronchak

Ehardt Kowall Rivet Zelenko

Faunce Kuipers Rocca

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

The House agreed to the full title of the bill.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

______

Rep. Jacobs moved that Rep. Schermesser be excused temporarily from today's session.

The motion prevailed.

The Speaker laid before the House

House Bill No. 5421, entitled

A bill to amend 1966 PA 331, entitled "Community college act of 1966," by amending section 126 (MCL 389.126).

The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,

The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 463 Yeas--98

Adamini Faunce LaSata Rocca

Allen Frank Lipsey Schauer

Anderson George Lockwood Scranton

Basham Gieleghem McConico Shackleton

Bernero Gilbert Mead Sheltrown

Birkholz Godchaux Meyer Shulman

Bisbee Gosselin Middaugh Spade

Bishop Hager Mortimer Stallworth

Bogardus Hale Murphy Stamas

Bovin Hansen Neumann Stewart

Bradstreet Hardman Newell Switalski

Brown, B. Hart O'Neil Tabor

Brown, C. Howell Palmer Thomas

Brown, R. Hummel Pappageorge Toy

Callahan Jacobs Patterson Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Pestka Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Phillips Vander Veen

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Plakas Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Pumford Voorhees

Dennis Julian Raczkowski Waters

DeRossett Koetje Reeves Williams

DeVuyst Kolb Richardville Woodward

DeWeese Kooiman Richner Woronchak

Drolet Kowall Rivet Zelenko

Ehardt Kuipers

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

The House agreed to the full title of the bill.

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

______

Rep. Vander Roest moved that Rep. DeVuyst be excused from the balance of today's session.

The motion prevailed.

The Speaker laid before the House

Senate Bill No. 1006, entitled

A bill to amend 1945 PA 327, entitled "An act relating to aeronautics in this state; providing for the development and regulation thereof; creating a state aeronautics commission; prescribing powers and duties; providing for the licensing, or registration, or supervision and control of all aircraft, airports and landing fields, schools of aviation, flying clubs, airmen, aviation instructors, airport managers, manufacturers, dealers, and commercial operation in intrastate commerce; providing for rules pertaining thereto; prescribing a privilege tax for the use of the aeronautical facilities on the lands and waters of this state; providing for the acquisition, development, and operation of airports, landing fields, and other aeronautical facilities by the state, by political subdivisions, or by public airport authorities; providing for the incorporation of public airport authorities and providing for the powers, duties, and obligations of public airport authorities; providing for the transfer of airport management to public airport authorities, including the transfer of airport liabilities, employees, and operational jurisdiction; providing jurisdiction of crimes, torts, and contracts; providing police powers for those entrusted to enforce this act; providing for civil liability of owners, operators, and others; making hunting from aircraft unlawful; providing for repair station operators lien; providing for appeals from rules or orders issued by the commission; providing for the transfer from the Michigan board of aeronautics to the aeronautics commission all properties and funds held by the board of aeronautics; providing for a state aeronautics fund and making an appropriation therefor; prescribing penalties; and making uniform the law with reference to state development and regulation of aeronautics," by amending section 85 (MCL 259.85), as amended by 1996 PA 370.

(The bill was received from the Senate on April 9, with amendments, full title inserted and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until April 10, see House Journal No. 29, p. 906.)

The question being on concurring in the amendments made to the bill by the Senate,

The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 464 Yeas--92

Adamini Frank Lipsey Rivet

Allen George Lockwood Rocca

Anderson Gieleghem McConico Schauer

Basham Gilbert Mead Scranton

Bernero Hager Meyer Shackleton

Birkholz Hale Middaugh Shulman

Bisbee Hansen Minore Spade

Bishop Hardman Mortimer Stallworth

Bogardus Hart Murphy Stamas

Bovin Howell Neumann Stewart

Brown, B. Hummel Newell Switalski

Brown, C. Jacobs O'Neil Tabor

Brown, R. Jamnick Palmer Thomas

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Toy

Caul Jelinek Patterson Van Woerkom

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vander Roest

Clarke, H. Julian Phillips Vander Veen

Dennis Koetje Plakas Voorhees

DeRossett Kolb Pumford Waters

DeWeese Kooiman Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kowall Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kuipers Richardville Woronchak

Faunce LaSata Richner Zelenko

Nays--5

Bradstreet Gosselin Johnson, Ruth Vear

Godchaux

In The Chair: Ehardt

The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.

______

Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Julian resumed the Chair.

Rep. Callahan asked and obtained an excuse from the balance of today's session.

Third Reading of Bills

Senate Bill No. 882, entitled

A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled "The insurance code of 1956," (MCL 500.100 to 500.8302) by adding section 3341.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 465 Yeas--95

Adamini Frank LaSata Rocca

Allen George Lipsey Schauer

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Scranton

Basham Gilbert Mead Shackleton

Bernero Gosselin Meyer Sheltrown

Birkholz Hager Middaugh Shulman

Bisbee Hale Minore Spade

Bishop Hansen Mortimer Stallworth

Bogardus Hardman Murphy Stamas

Bovin Hart Neumann Stewart

Bradstreet Howell Newell Switalski

Brown, B. Hummel O'Neil Tabor

Brown, C. Jacobs Palmer Thomas

Brown, R. Jamnick Pappageorge Toy

Cassis Jansen Patterson Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Pestka Vander Roest

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Plakas Vear

Dennis Julian Pumford Voorhees

DeRossett Koetje Raczkowski Williams

DeWeese Kolb Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kowall Richner Zelenko

Faunce Kuipers Rivet

Nays--2

McConico Waters

In The Chair: Julian

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to revise, consolidate, and classify the laws relating to the insurance and surety business; to regulate the incorporation or formation of domestic insurance and surety companies and associations and the admission of foreign and alien companies and associations; to provide their rights, powers, and immunities and to prescribe the conditions on which companies and associations organized, existing, or authorized under this act may exercise their powers; to provide the rights, powers, and immunities and to prescribe the conditions on which other persons, firms, corporations, associations, risk retention groups, and purchasing groups engaged in an insurance or surety business may exercise their powers; to provide for the imposition of a privilege fee on domestic insurance companies and associations and the state accident fund; to provide for the imposition of a tax on the business of foreign and alien companies and associations; to provide for the imposition of a tax on risk retention groups and purchasing groups; to provide for the imposition of a tax on the business of surplus line agents; to provide for the imposition of regulatory fees on certain insurers; to modify tort liability arising out of certain accidents; to provide for limited actions with respect to that modified tort liability and to prescribe certain procedures for maintaining those actions; to require security for losses arising out of certain accidents; to provide for the continued availability and affordability of automobile insurance and homeowners insurance in this state and to facilitate the purchase of that insurance by all residents of this state at fair and reasonable rates; to provide for certain reporting with respect to insurance and with respect to certain claims against uninsured or self-insured persons; to prescribe duties for certain state departments and officers with respect to that reporting; to provide for certain assessments; to establish and continue certain state insurance funds; to modify and clarify the status, rights, powers, duties, and operations of the nonprofit malpractice insurance fund; to provide for the departmental supervision and regulation of the insurance and surety business within this state; to provide for regulation over worker's compensation self-insurers; to provide for the conservation, rehabilitation, or liquidation of unsound or insolvent insurers; to provide for the protection of policyholders, claimants, and creditors of unsound or insolvent insurers; to provide for associations of insurers to protect policyholders and claimants in the event of insurer insolvencies; to prescribe educational requirements for insurance agents and solicitors; to provide for the regulation of multiple employer welfare arrangements; to create an automobile theft prevention authority to reduce the number of automobile thefts in this state; to prescribe the powers and duties of the automobile theft prevention authority; to provide certain powers and duties upon certain officials, departments, and authorities of this state; to repeal acts and parts of acts; and to provide penalties for the violation of this act,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

House Bill No. 5607, entitled

A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled "The general property tax act," by amending sections 8a, 8c, and 19 (MCL 211.8a, 211.8c, and 211.19), section 8a as amended and section 8c as added by 1998 PA 537 and section 19 as amended by 1996 PA 126.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 466 Yeas--98

Adamini George Lipsey Rocca

Allen Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Anderson Gilbert McConico Scranton

Basham Godchaux Mead Shackleton

Bernero Gosselin Meyer Sheltrown

Birkholz Hager Middaugh Shulman

Bisbee Hale Minore Spade

Bishop Hansen Mortimer Stallworth

Bogardus Hardman Murphy Stamas

Bovin Hart Neumann Stewart

Bradstreet Howell Newell Switalski

Brown, B. Hummel O'Neil Tabor

Brown, C. Jacobs Palmer Thomas

Brown, R. Jamnick Pappageorge Toy

Cassis Jansen Patterson Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Pestka Vander Roest

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Phillips Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Plakas Vear

Dennis Julian Pumford Voorhees

DeRossett Koetje Raczkowski Waters

DeWeese Kolb Reeves Williams

Drolet Kooiman Richardville Woodward

Ehardt Kowall Richner Woronchak

Faunce Kuipers Rivet Zelenko

Frank LaSata

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The question being on agreeing to the title of the bill,

Rep. Patterson moved to amend the title to read as follows:

A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled "The general property tax act," by amending sections 8a, 8c, 19, and 24c (MCL 211.8a, 211.8c, 211.19, and 211.24c), section 8a as amended and section 8c as added by 1998 PA 537, section 19 as amended by 1996 PA 126, and section 24c as amended by 1996 PA 476.

The motion prevailed.

The House agreed to the title as amended.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 916, entitled

A bill to amend 1943 PA 92, entitled "An act to protect the interest of the public, acquired other than through taxation, in lands under the jurisdiction and control of the state land office board and department of conservation, and to make an appropriation therefor," by amending sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 (MCL 211.371, 211.372, 211.373, and 211.374).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 467 Yeas--96

Adamini Frank LaSata Rivet

Allen George Lipsey Rocca

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Schauer

Basham Gilbert McConico Scranton

Bernero Godchaux Mead Shackleton

Birkholz Gosselin Meyer Sheltrown

Bisbee Hager Middaugh Shulman

Bishop Hale Minore Spade

Bogardus Hardman Mortimer Stallworth

Bovin Hart Murphy Stamas

Bradstreet Howell Neumann Stewart

Brown, B. Hummel Newell Switalski

Brown, C. Jacobs O'Neil Tabor

Brown, R. Jamnick Palmer Toy

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Patterson Vander Roest

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Phillips Vear

Dennis Julian Plakas Voorhees

DeRossett Koetje Pumford Waters

DeWeese Kolb Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kooiman Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kowall Richardville Woronchak

Faunce Kuipers Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 918, entitled

A bill to amend 1897 PA 263, entitled "An act to authorize the auditor general to accept payment of taxes and charges from the owner of any description of land held by the state as state tax lands," by amending section 1 (MCL 211.541).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 468 Yeas--97

Adamini George LaSata Rocca

Allen Gieleghem Lipsey Schauer

Anderson Gilbert Lockwood Scranton

Basham Godchaux McConico Shackleton

Bernero Gosselin Mead Sheltrown

Birkholz Hager Meyer Shulman

Bisbee Hale Middaugh Spade

Bishop Hansen Minore Stallworth

Bogardus Hardman Mortimer Stamas

Bovin Hart Murphy Stewart

Bradstreet Howell Neumann Switalski

Brown, B. Hummel Newell Tabor

Brown, C. Jacobs O'Neil Thomas

Brown, R. Jamnick Palmer Toy

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Patterson Vander Roest

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Phillips Vear

Dennis Julian Plakas Voorhees

DeRossett Koetje Pumford Waters

DeWeese Kolb Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kooiman Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kowall Richardville Woronchak

Faunce Kuipers Richner Zelenko

Frank

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Jacobs moved that Rep. Plakas be excused from the balance of today's session.

The motion prevailed.

House Bill No. 4428, entitled

A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled "The revised school code," by amending section 1233 (MCL 380.1233), as amended by 2000 PA 288.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 469 Yeas--59

Allen Gieleghem Kuipers Richner

Bernero Gilbert LaSata Rocca

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Shackleton

Bisbee Hager Meyer Shulman

Bishop Hart Middaugh Spade

Bradstreet Howell Minore Stamas

Brown, C. Hummel Mortimer Tabor

Cassis Jansen Murphy Van Woerkom

Caul Jelinek Newell Vander Roest

DeRossett Johnson, Rick Palmer Vander Veen

DeWeese Johnson, Ruth Pappageorge Vear

Drolet Julian Patterson Voorhees

Ehardt Koetje Pestka Woodward

Faunce Kooiman Raczkowski Zelenko

George Kowall Richardville

Nays--37

Adamini Frank Lockwood Sheltrown

Anderson Godchaux McConico Stallworth

Basham Hale Neumann Stewart

Bogardus Hansen O'Neil Switalski

Bovin Hardman Phillips Thomas

Brown, B. Jacobs Pumford Toy

Brown, R. Jamnick Reeves Waters

Clark, I. Kolb Schauer Williams

Clarke, H. Lipsey Scranton Woronchak

Dennis

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 1057, entitled

A bill to amend 1925 PA 12, entitled "An act to provide for the laying out and establishing of additional trunk line mileage; to make all roads that have been improved as federal aid projects, and all roads that have been, or that may hereafter be, approved for federal aid, trunk line highways; to provide for the widening, altering or straightening of trunk line highways; to provide for the abandonment, alteration or change of any portion of the trunk line highway; and to repeal all acts and parts of acts inconsistent herewith," by repealing section 2 (MCL 250.112).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 470 Yeas--95

Adamini Frank Kuipers Schauer

Allen George LaSata Scranton

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Shackleton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Sheltrown

Bernero Godchaux McConico Shulman

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Spade

Bisbee Hager Meyer Stallworth

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stamas

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stewart

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Switalski

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Tabor

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Thomas

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Toy

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Van Woerkom

Cassis Jamnick Palmer Vander Roest

Caul Jansen Pappageorge Vander Veen

Clark, I. Jelinek Patterson Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Pestka Voorhees

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Pumford Waters

DeRossett Julian Raczkowski Williams

DeWeese Koetje Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kolb Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kooiman Richner Zelenko

Faunce Kowall Rocca

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 836, entitled

A bill to amend 1994 PA 325, entitled "The international tradeport development authority act," by amending section 16 (MCL 125.2536); and to repeal acts and parts of acts.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 471 Yeas--95

Adamini Frank Kuipers Schauer

Allen George LaSata Scranton

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Shackleton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Sheltrown

Bernero Godchaux McConico Shulman

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Spade

Bisbee Hager Meyer Stallworth

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stamas

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stewart

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Switalski

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Tabor

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Thomas

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Toy

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Van Woerkom

Cassis Jamnick Palmer Vander Roest

Caul Jansen Pappageorge Vander Veen

Clark, I. Jelinek Patterson Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Pestka Voorhees

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Phillips Waters

DeRossett Julian Pumford Williams

DeWeese Koetje Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kolb Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kooiman Richner Zelenko

Faunce Kowall Rocca

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to create certain authorities; to authorize creation of certain funds; to authorize expenditures from the funds; to finance the purchase of land and the development of facilities and of public improvements or related facilities; to provide for appropriations; and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state and local officials,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Richardville moved to reconsider the vote by which the House passed Senate Bill No. 836.

The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Tax Policy.

The motion prevailed.

Senate Bill No. 837, entitled

A bill to amend 1995 PA 280, entitled "An act to authorize local units of government to accept financial transaction device payments," by amending section 1 (MCL 129.221).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 472 Yeas--94

Adamini Frank LaSata Schauer

Allen George Lipsey Scranton

Anderson Gilbert Lockwood Shackleton

Basham Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Bernero Gosselin Mead Shulman

Birkholz Hager Meyer Spade

Bisbee Hale Middaugh Stallworth

Bishop Hansen Minore Stamas

Bogardus Hardman Mortimer Stewart

Bovin Hart Murphy Switalski

Bradstreet Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, B. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, C. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Brown, R. Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

Dennis Julian Pumford Waters

DeRossett Koetje Reeves Williams

DeWeese Kolb Richardville Woodward

Drolet Kooiman Richner Woronchak

Ehardt Kowall Rocca Zelenko

Faunce Kuipers

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 838, entitled

A bill to amend 1995 PA 266, entitled "An act to authorize and regulate credit card transactions involving local units of government, including the use of credit cards by officers and employees of local units of government; and to provide for powers and duties of certain state and local agencies, officers, and employees," by amending sections 1 and 2 (MCL 129.241 and 129.242), section 1 as amended by 2000 PA 169.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 473 Yeas--94

Adamini Frank Kuipers Rocca

Allen George LaSata Schauer

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Scranton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Shackleton

Bernero Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Shulman

Bisbee Hager Meyer Spade

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stamas

Bogardus Hansen Mortimer Stewart

Bovin Hardman Murphy Switalski

Bradstreet Hart Neumann Tabor

Brown, B. Howell Newell Thomas

Brown, C. Hummel O'Neil Toy

Brown, R. Jacobs Palmer Van Woerkom

Cassis Jamnick Pappageorge Vander Roest

Caul Jansen Patterson Vander Veen

Clark, I. Jelinek Pestka Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Phillips Voorhees

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Pumford Waters

DeRossett Julian Raczkowski Williams

DeWeese Koetje Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kolb Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kooiman Richner Zelenko

Faunce Kowall

Nays--0

In The Chair: Julian

The House agreed to the title of the bill.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

______

Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Ehardt resumed the Chair.

Senate Bill No. 839, entitled

A bill to amend 1968 PA 2, entitled "Uniform budgeting and accounting act," by amending section 4 (MCL 141.424), as amended by 2000 PA 493.

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 474 Yeas--96

Adamini Frank Kuipers Rocca

Allen George LaSata Schauer

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Scranton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Shackleton

Bernero Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Shulman

Bisbee Hager Meyer Spade

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stallworth

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stamas

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Stewart

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Switalski

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Cassis Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

DeRossett Julian Pumford Waters

DeWeese Koetje Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kolb Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Faunce Kowall Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to provide for the formulation and establishment of uniform charts of accounts and reports in local units of government; to define local units of government; to provide for the examination of the books and accounts of local units of government; to provide for annual financial reports from local units of government; to provide for the administration of this act; to prescribe the powers and duties of the state treasurer, the attorney general, the library of Michigan and depository libraries, and other officers and entities; to provide penalties for violation of certain requirements of this act; to provide for meeting the expenses authorized by this act; to provide a uniform budgeting system for local units; and to prohibit deficit spending by a local unit of government,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 1026, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled "The Michigan penal code," by repealing section 502 (MCL 750.502).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 475 Yeas--95

Adamini Frank LaSata Schauer

Allen George Lipsey Scranton

Anderson Gieleghem Lockwood Shackleton

Basham Gilbert McConico Sheltrown

Bernero Godchaux Mead Shulman

Birkholz Gosselin Meyer Spade

Bisbee Hager Middaugh Stallworth

Bishop Hale Minore Stamas

Bogardus Hansen Mortimer Stewart

Bovin Hardman Murphy Switalski

Bradstreet Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, B. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, C. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Brown, R. Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Cassis Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Caul Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clark, I. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Clarke, H. Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

Dennis Julian Pumford Waters

DeRossett Koetje Raczkowski Williams

DeWeese Kolb Reeves Woodward

Drolet Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Ehardt Kowall Richner Zelenko

Faunce Kuipers Rocca

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

"An act to revise, consolidate, codify and add to the statutes relating to crimes; to define crimes and prescribe the penalties therefor; to provide for restitution under certain circumstances; to provide for the competency of evidence at the trial of persons accused of crime; to provide immunity from prosecution for certain witnesses appearing at such trials; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts inconsistent with or contravening any of the provisions of this act,".

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 1027, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled "The Michigan penal code," by repealing section 41 (MCL 750.41).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 476 Yeas--96

Adamini Frank Kuipers Rocca

Allen George LaSata Schauer

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Scranton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Shackleton

Bernero Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Shulman

Bisbee Hager Meyer Spade

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stallworth

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stamas

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Stewart

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Switalski

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Cassis Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

DeRossett Julian Pumford Waters

DeWeese Koetje Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kolb Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Faunce Kowall Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

Senate Bill No. 1032, entitled

A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled "The Michigan penal code," by repealing section 409 (MCL 750.409).

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Roll Call No. 477 Yeas--96

Adamini Frank Kuipers Rocca

Allen George LaSata Schauer

Anderson Gieleghem Lipsey Scranton

Basham Gilbert Lockwood Shackleton

Bernero Godchaux McConico Sheltrown

Birkholz Gosselin Mead Shulman

Bisbee Hager Meyer Spade

Bishop Hale Middaugh Stallworth

Bogardus Hansen Minore Stamas

Bovin Hardman Mortimer Stewart

Bradstreet Hart Murphy Switalski

Brown, B. Howell Neumann Tabor

Brown, C. Hummel Newell Thomas

Brown, R. Jacobs O'Neil Toy

Cassis Jamnick Palmer Van Woerkom

Caul Jansen Pappageorge Vander Roest

Clark, I. Jelinek Patterson Vander Veen

Clarke, H. Johnson, Rick Pestka Vear

Dennis Johnson, Ruth Phillips Voorhees

DeRossett Julian Pumford Waters

DeWeese Koetje Raczkowski Williams

Drolet Kolb Reeves Woodward

Ehardt Kooiman Richardville Woronchak

Faunce Kowall Richner Zelenko

Nays--0

In The Chair: Ehardt

Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:

The House agreed to the full title.

Rep. Richardville moved that the bill be given immediate effect.

The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.

______

Rep. Richardville moved that House Committees be given leave to meet during the balance of today's session.

The motion prevailed.

By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of

Motions and Resolutions

Reps. Richardville, Birkholz, Patterson, Pappageorge, Julian, Woronchak, Van Woerkom, Gilbert, Spade, Hager, Ehardt, Palmer, Rivet, DeWeese, Faunce, Kowall, Raczkowski, Shackleton, Bovin, Drolet, Adamini, Cameron Brown, Middaugh, Rich Brown, Ruth Johnson and Pumford offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 397.

A resolution to memorialize the Congress of the United States to enact legislation to authorize grants through the Environmental Protection Agency for remediation of sediment contamination in Michigan's Areas of Concern.

Whereas, Michigan's 14 Areas of Concern represent an enormous environmental challenge for our state. Cleaning up these threats to Michigan's future will demand resources far beyond those currently available in our state or local communities; and

Whereas, In addition to the obvious need for significant funding of cleanup efforts, the complexities of the Areas of Concern also demonstrate the need for considerable research and technical assistance. Even as efforts are undertaken to deal with the problems of sediment contamination, there is a great need to further study public health impacts. There is also a clear need for new strategies and technologies to prevent further or renewed contamination of sediment; and

Whereas, There is legislation before Congress that would provide a much-needed boost to the effort to clean up Michigan's Areas of Concern. This bill, H.R. 1070, would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to make grants for the remediation of sediment contamination in Areas of Concern. The legislation would also authorize assistance for research and development of innovative technologies to address the long- and short-term issues related to sediment contamination; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That we memorialize the Congress of the United States to enact legislation to authorize grants through the Environmental Protection Agency for remediation of sediment contamination in Michigan's Areas of Concern; and be it further

Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.

The resolution was referred to the Committee on Land Use and Environment.

Reps. Thomas, Vander Roest, Clark, Raczkowski, Schauer, DeRossett, Gieleghem, Pappageorge, Jansen, Hale, Woodward, Faunce, Neumann, Ehardt, Dennis, Rivet, Basham, Kolb, Bogardus, Plakas, Minore, Vander Veen, Phillips, Sheltrown, Anderson, Jamnick, Spade, Hansen, Bovin, Jacobs, Murphy, Lipsey, McConico, Rich Brown, Shulman, Zelenko, Lockwood, Waters, Hardman, Adamini and Pestka offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 398.

A resolution honoring Ms. Eloise Culmer Whitten for her 39 outstanding years in public service.

Whereas, It is with deep appreciation for the hard work, dedication, and professionalism that Ms. Eloise Whitten has put forth on behalf of the people of the city of Detroit that we offer this expression of our thanks. As the people of the city of Detroit recognize the loyalty and devotion to public service of this conscientious individual, we add our sentiments of gratitude for a job well done; and

Whereas, In her 39 years of service to the people of the city of Detroit, Ms. Eloise Whitten has been working in the public arena during an era of great change. As she well knows, financial pressures and changing expectations have combined to make the recent past a challenging time to work in local government. With the personal sense of duty that Ms. Eloise Whitten brings to work each day, she has been able to meet this challenge with enthusiasm and a genuine interest in efficiency in public service. This has been deeply appreciated, both by citizens and organizations in the city of Detroit that have benefited directly from Ms. Eloise Whitten's work, as well as other public servants who have witnessed this fine example; and

Whereas, There can be little doubt that the record of Ms. Eloise Whitten, compiled over the past 39 years, will continue to reap rewards for the people of the city of Detroit. We offer our thanks on this personal milestone; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body honor Ms. Eloise Culmer Whitten for her 39 outstanding years in public service; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to Ms. Eloise Whitten as a token of our esteem.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,

Rep. Patterson moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Reps. Thomas, Vander Roest, Clark, Raczkowski, Schauer, DeRossett, Gieleghem, Pappageorge, Hale, Woodward, Faunce, Neumann, Ehardt, Dennis, Rivet, Basham, Kolb, Bogardus, Plakas, Minore, Vander Veen, Phillips, Sheltrown, Anderson, Jamnick, Spade, Hansen, Bovin, Jacobs, Murphy, Lipsey, McConico, Rich Brown, Shulman, Schermesser, Zelenko, Lockwood, Waters, Hardman, Adamini and Pestka offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 399.

A resolution honoring Jesse E. Sangster upon the occasion of his retirement from the Detroit Public Schools.

Whereas, The retirement of Jesse E. Sangster from his responsibilities as a teacher and principal brings to a close an era of dedicated service to the young people of the city of Detroit. We are pleased to join with students, co-workers, parents, family, and friends in expressing our appreciation and best wishes to this most devoted professional; and

Whereas, In his many years as a teacher and principal, Jesse E. Sangster has followed the noble pursuit of educating young people, a tradition that always has been an important part of Michigan's heritage. In his work in the Detroit Public Schools, he has instilled life-long skills and helped build self-confidence in thousands of youngsters who have grown to adulthood as capable and upstanding citizens. Though the tools used by modern day teachers are far different than the slates and one-room schools of yesteryear, Jesse E. Sangster has much in common with the teachers and principals from our pioneer era who worked so hard to build the future of this state through its children; and

Whereas, During Jesse E. Sangster's years in the classroom and as principal, many changes have occurred in our society that affect the learning process. His ability to meet the challenge and cope with a changing world requires not only skill, but a deep sense of emotional concern as well. We thank Jesse for passing this legacy on to our rising generations; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body honor Jesse E. Sangster upon the occasion of his retirement from the Detroit Public Schools. May he enjoy the health and happiness his years have earned; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to Jesse E. Sangster as a token of our esteem.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,

Rep. Patterson moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Reps. Gieleghem, Vander Roest, Clark, Raczkowski, Schauer, George, DeRossett, Callahan, Pappageorge, Hale, Woodward, Faunce, Neumann, Ehardt, Dennis, Rivet, Basham, Kolb, Thomas, Bogardus, Plakas, Minore, Vander Veen, Sheltrown, Anderson, Jamnick, Spade, Hansen, Bovin, Jacobs, Murphy, Lipsey, McConico, Gosselin, Rich Brown, Birkholz, Shulman, Scranton, Schermesser, Zelenko, Frank, Lockwood, Waters, Hardman, Adamini and Pestka offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 400.

A resolution recognizing April 14-20, 2002, as National Medical Laboratory Week.

Whereas, Approximately 300,000 practitioners of clinical laboratory science will celebrate the week of April 14-20, 2002, as National Medical Laboratory Week; and

Whereas, Clinical laboratory science professionals are key members of health care teams across the United States and Michigan and play an increasingly vital role in the diagnosis and prevention of diseases. The efforts of these dedicated health care team members, who work in the largest industry in the United States, often go unnoticed by the public, as well as the institutions employing their services; and

Whereas, The public now demands assurances of quality health care. Professional organizations representing practitioners of this critical science have a responsibility to ensure that the public is well informed about clinical laboratory competency. Beyond the public need for this week, the celebration of National Medical Laboratory Week increases recognition of the profession and improves worker's sense of self-worth and service to the patient; and

Whereas, The various professional groups within laboratory practice work together to enhance a sense of unity and purpose necessary to further the goals of all laboratory workers. While the members of this distinguished organization gather to expand their knowledge and impart their experiences to their colleagues, we offer our thanks for their dedication; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body recognize April 14-20, 2002, as National Medical Laboratory Week. We also congratulate and thank clinical laboratory professionals for their invaluable contributions to the lives of all Michigan residents each and every day by providing reliable laboratory test results that are required for the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of disease; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Michigan Society for Clinical Laboratory Science during its annual meeting at Kalamazoo on April 17-19, 2002.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,

Rep. Patterson moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Rep. Stewart offered the following resolution:

House Resolution No. 401.

A resolution honoring the Johnson Creek Protection Group.

Whereas, It is with deep appreciation for all of the hard work, commitment, and planning this group represents that we commend all the people involved with the Johnson Creek Protection Group in Northville Township. The mission of the Johnson Creek Protection Group is to preserve, protect, restore, and enhance the water quality, habitat, and function of the cold water stream and its watershed. As members of the community and the people behind this group gather to take an activist approach to protecting the quality of streams and recreational property, we are proud to add our voice to commend everyone who has worked so hard to make the Johnson Creek Protection Group possible; and

Whereas, There can be no discounting the significance of the Johnson Creek Protection Group, they express their confidence in the future of the Johnson Creek by their involvement. Sometimes the best public policy is often not from the top down but from the bottom up. This group is truly an important asset to the state of Michigan; and

Whereas, The citizens of the Johnson Creek Protection Group have shown their civic involvement and leadership to the community. We join them in wishing the best to the Steering Committee and the citizens of the Johnson Creek Protection Group on their efforts to preserve and protect our natural resources in Michigan; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body honor the Johnson Creek Protection Group. May the future bring them great success and satisfaction; and be it further

Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the Johnson Creek Protection Group as a token of our esteem.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,

Rep. Patterson moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted.

Rep. Gieleghem moved that the House adjourn.

The motion prevailed, the time being 3:40 p.m.

Associate Speaker Pro Tempore Ehardt declared the House adjourned until Tuesday, April 16, at 2:00 p.m.

GARY L. RANDALL

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Adamini	Faunce	LaSata	Rivet
Allen	Frank	Lemmons	Rocca
Anderson	George	Lipsey	Schauer
Basham	Gieleghem	Lockwood	Schermesser
Bernero	Gilbert	Mans	Shackleton
Birkholz	Godchaux	McConico	Sheltrown
Bisbee	Gosselin	Mead	Shulman
Bishop	Hager	Meyer	Spade
Bogardus	Hale	Middaugh	Stallworth
Bovin	Hansen	Minore	Stamas
Bradstreet	Hardman	Mortimer	Stewart
Brown, B.	Hart	Neumann	Switalski
Brown, C.	Howell	Newell	Tabor
Brown, R.	Hummel	O'Neil	Thomas
Callahan	Jacobs	Palmer	Toy
Cassis	Jamnick	Pappageorge	Van Woerkom
Caul	Jansen	Patterson	Vander Roest
Clark, I.	Jelinek	Pestka	Vander Veen
Clarke, H.	Johnson, Rick	Phillips	Vear
Daniels	Johnson, Ruth	Plakas	Voorhees
Dennis	Julian	Pumford	Waters
DeRossett	Koetje	Raczkowski	Williams
DeVuyst	Kolb	Reeves	Wojno
DeWeese	Kooiman	Richardville	Woodward
Drolet	Kowall	Richner	Woronchak
Ehardt	Kuipers	Rison	Zelenko