S.B. 467: COMMITTEE SUMMARY - PUB. ASSISTANCE: ELECT. TRANSFER



Senate Bill 467 (as introduced 4-29-97)

Sponsor: Senator Michael J. Bouchard

Committee: Families, Mental Health and Human Services


Date Completed: 5-6-97


CONTENT


The bill would amend the Social Welfare Act to require that, no later than the beginning of fiscal year 2005, the Family Independence Agency (FIA) provide all assistance under the Act by means of an electronic benefit transfer system. The FIA could promulgate rules under the Administrative Procedures Act to implement the bill.


Proposed MCL 400.10c - Legislative Analyst: P. Affholter


FISCAL IMPACT


The bill would have an indeterminate fiscal impact on State government expenditures. If the Family Independence Agency continues its current plan to implement the Michigan Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) system, this bill would codify that plan. The FIA is in the development stages of implementing the system with a pilot project scheduled to begin March 1, 1998, in Jackson County at an approximate cost of $1,700,000. It is estimated that the statewide system will begin October 1, 1998, at an estimated cost of $7,900,000. The FIA cost projections estimate that by FY 2000 to 2004 the system's cost will be approximately $10,100,000 per year. By FY 2005 this cost will be in the FIA's base appropriation. However, additional costs could be incurred for inflationary increases.


The estimated saving to the State would be reflected in the cost of warrants issued versus the cost for EBT transactions. The latest FIA cash benefits caseload is approximately 162,022. The cost of each warrant, including postage, is approximately $.51, or $82,631.22 each month for all warrants. An EBT transaction costs approximately an average of $.07, for a total cost of $11,341.54 per month. The savings, therefore, would be approximately $855,500 for the year. However, taking into account that caseloads are dropping, the saving would be adjusted downward as long as caseload reduction continued to happen.


It appears the bill would have no fiscal impact on local government.


- Fiscal Analyst: C. Cole



S9798\S467SA

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.