SUMMARY AS PASSED BY THE SENATE
The bill would add Part 6D to the Revised School Code to provide for the organization and administration of conversion schools, which would be public schools previously operated by a school district and converted under a contract issued by an authorizing body. The bill would do the following:
-- Allow a public school operated by a school district to be converted to and operated as a conversion school pursuant to a parental petition under Section 1280c (described below).
-- Allow a school to be converted only if it were among the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in the State.
-- Require an application to convert a school to be submitted to an authorizing body.
-- Provide that a school board, intermediate school board, or community college board could not issue a contract for a conversion school to operate outside the boundaries of the district.
-- Specify provisions that a contract would have to contain, including the school's educational goals and the methods that would be used to hold the school accountable.
-- Require the goals to include making measurable progress toward academic achievement for all groups of pupils, toward average attendance of at least 80%, and toward a high school graduation rate of at least 80%.
-- Provide that an initial contract could not exceed five years from the beginning of the school year when the school was to start operating.
-- Require a conversion school to use certificated teachers except as provided for a school authorized by a university or community college.
-- Require a conversion school to be located within the same attendance area of the school district that previously operated the school, and permit the conversion school to be located at the building that was converted.
-- Require a school district to lease a school building to a conversion school for $1 per year, if the building were used for classroom instruction.
-- Allow an authorizing body to revoke a conversion school's contract under certain circumstances and to take corrective measures to avoid revocation.
-- Require revocation if a conversion school were among the lowest-achieving schools in the State after operating for at least four years, and other conditions were met.
-- Require the State School Reform/Redesign Officer to implement a new restructuring model in the school building if, at the time of revocation, the school were among the lowest-achieving schools in the State and had been in continuous operation in the building that had been occupied by the converted public school.
-- Allow an authorizing body to charge a fee of up to 3% of a conversion school's total State school aid for overseeing the school's contract.
-- Prohibit a conversion school from levying any taxes.
-- Prohibit a conversion school from charging tuition or discriminating in its pupil admissions.
-- Allow a conversion school to limit admission to pupils within a particular age range or grade level, but require it to include all of the grades offered before the conversion.
The bill would amend Section 1280c of the Code, which pertains to the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in the State, to do the following:
-- Require the board of a public school to notify the parent or legal guardian of each enrolled pupil within seven days after the school was placed under the supervision of the State School Reform/Redesign Officer (SRRO) because it was one of the lowest-achieving 5% of public schools.
-- Within 90 days after a school was placed under the supervision of the SRRO, allow a parental petition to be submitted to the Department of Education recommending a single school intervention model to be implemented for the school in a redesign plan.
-- Require the Department to take certain actions if the petition were signed by at least 60% of the eligible parents or legal guardians of pupils at the school, or by at least 51% of the eligible parents or guardians plus at least 60% of the eligible teachers.
-- Require the school board to work with the SRRO to implement the recommended intervention model if it were a restructuring model other than the restart model.
-- Allow the parents and legal guardians to apply for a contract to operate the public school as a conversion school, if the recommended intervention model were the restart model; and require other measures to be taken if an application for a contract were not submitted or a contract were not issued.
-- Provide that the SRRO could not place a public school in the State School Reform/Redesign school district before five years had expired, if a school board implemented the intervention model recommended in a parental petition or if a contract to operate the school as a conversion school were obtained.
In addition, the bill would include a school operated by a conversion school corporation in the Code's definition of "public school", and would include a conversion school in the definition of "public school academy".
Proposed Part 6D
Legal Status; Organization
A conversion school would be a public school under Article VIII, Section 2 of the State Constitution (which requires the State to maintain a system of free public elementary and secondary schools), would be a school district for the purposes of Article IX, Section 11 of the Constitution (which established the State School Aid Fund) and for the purposes of borrowing money and issuing bonds, and would be subject to the general supervision of the State Board of Education. A conversion school would be a body corporate and a governmental agency.
A conversion school corporation would have to be organized under the Nonprofit Corporation Act, but would not be required to comply with certain requirements of that Act that deal with education corporations and educational foundations.
To the extent disqualified under the State or U.S. Constitution, a conversion school could not be organized by a church or other religious organization and could not have any organizational or contractual affiliation with or constitute a church or other religious organization.
A conversion school would be presumed to be legally organized if it had exercised the franchises and privileges of a conversion school for at least two years.
A conversion school would have to be organized and administered under the direction of a board of directors in accordance with proposed Part 6D and bylaws adopted by the board.
Eligibility for Conversion
A public school operated by a school district could be converted to and operated as a conversion school pursuant to a parental petition under Section 1280c (as described below).
A public school operated by a school district could not be converted to a conversion school unless it were on the list required under Section 1280c identifying the public schools in this State that the Department of Education has determined to be among the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in Michigan. (Section 1280c requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to publish that list annually.)
Any of the following could act as an authorizing body to issue a contract to organize and operate a conversion school:
-- The board of a school district.
-- An intermediate school board.
-- The board of a community college.
-- The governing board of a State public university.
-- Two or more of those entities exercising power, privilege, or authority jointly pursuant to an interlocal agreement under the Urban Cooperation Act.
The board of a school district, an intermediate school board, and the board of a community college could not issue a contract for a conversion school to operate outside the boundaries of the school district, intermediate school district, or community college district, respectively.
To obtain a contract to convert a public school operated by a school district to a conversion school, one or more people or a legal entity would have to apply to an authorizing body. An authorizing body could be any of the boards listed above or any of them acting jointly with the school district that previously operated the school.
The application for a contract would have to contain information specified in the bill, including the proposed articles of incorporation; a copy of the proposed bylaws; descriptions of staff responsibilities; the school year when the conversion school was to begin; and an agreement that the conversion school would comply with Part 6D and, subject to provisions of the part, with all other State law applicable to public bodies and with Federal law applicable to public bodies or school districts.
The application also would have to contain documentation meeting the requirements of the authorizing body, if any, including at least all of the following:
-- The governance structure of the conversion school.
-- A copy of the school's educational goals, the curriculum to be offered, and the methods of pupil assessment to be used.
-- The admission policy and criteria to be maintained by the school.
-- The school calendar and school day schedule.
-- The age or grade range of pupils to be enrolled, which would have to include at least all of the grades that were previously operated by the school that was converted.
The school year a conversion school was to begin operating would have to be one beginning at least nine months after the date the petition and application were submitted to the authorizing body. A conversion school could not begin to operate during a school year that already had begun.
Authorizing Body Responsibilities; Authority
An authorizing body would have to oversee, or contract with an intermediate school district (ISD), community college, or State public university to oversee, the board of directors of each conversion school operating under a contract issued by the authorizing body. The authorizing body also would be responsible for overseeing compliance by the board of directors with the contract and all applicable law.
If the Superintendent of Public Instruction (the State Superintendent) found that an authorizing body was not engaging in appropriate continuing oversight of one or more boards of directors of conversion schools, the Superintendent could suspend the power of the authorizing body to issue new contracts to organize and operate conversion schools. A contract issued by the authorizing body during the suspension would be void. A contract issued before the suspension would not be affected.
An authorizing body could not charge a fee, or require reimbursement of expenses, for considering a contract application, issuing a contract, or providing oversight of a contract for a conversion school, in an amount that exceeded a combined total of 3% of the total State school aid received by the school in the school year in which the fees or expenses were charged. An authorizing body could provide other services for a conversion school and charge a fee for them, but could not require such an arrangement as a condition of issuing the contract.
An authorizing body would have to adopt a resolution establishing the method of selection, length of term, and number of members of the board of directors of each conversion school subject to its jurisdiction.
An authorizing body that issued a conversion school contract also would have to do the following:
-- Develop a process for holding the school's board of directors accountable for meeting academic performance standards set forth in the contract and for implementing corrective action for a school that did not meet the standards.
-- Take necessary measures to ensure that the school board operated independently of any educational management company involved in the school's operations.
-- Oversee and ensure that the school's pupil admission process was operated in a fair and open manner and complied with the contract and Part 6D.
-- Ensure that the school board maintained and released information as necessary to comply with applicable law.
The authorizing body for a conversion school would be its fiscal agent. A State school aid payment for the school would have to be paid to the authorizing body, which would have to forward the payment to the school.
The decision of an authorizing body to issue, not issue, or reconstitute a contract under Part 6D, or to terminate or revoke a contract, would be solely within the discretion of the authorizing body, would be final, and would not be subject to review by a court or any State agency. The authorizing body would not be liable for that action to the conversion school, the conversion school corporation, a pupil of the school, the parent or guardian of a pupil, or any other person.
Contract Issuance; Contents
An authorizing body could issue a contract to organize and operate a conversion school if all of the following were submitted to it:
-- An application for a conversion school contract that met the bill's requirements.
-- A copy of the parental petition submitted and certified under Section 1280c that recommended that restart option.
-- Evidence satisfactory to the authorizing body that the public school to be converted was on the list identifying the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in the State.
An authorizing body would not be required to issue a contract to any person or entity. A conversion school contract would have to be issued on a competitive basis taking into consideration the resources available for the proposed school, the population to be served by it, and the educational goals to be achieved by the school.
Within 10 days after issuing a contract for a conversion school, the authorizing body would have to submit a copy of it to the State Superintendent.
A contract would have to contain at least all of the following:
-- The educational goals the school was to achieve and the methods by which it would be held accountable.
-- A description of the method to be used to monitor the school board's compliance with applicable law and its performance in meeting its targeted educational objectives.
-- A description of the process for amending the contract during its term.
-- Procedures for revoking the contract and grounds for revocation, including at least those listed in the bill.
-- Requirements and procedures for financial audits, which would have to be conducted at least annually by a certified public accountant.
-- The term of the contract and a description of the process and standards for renewing it, including increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils.
-- A requirement that the board ensure compliance with Public Act 317 of 1968 (which governs contracts between public employees and public entities).
-- A requirement that the board prohibit specifically identified family relationships between board members, individuals with an ownership interest in an educational management organization involved in the school's operation, officers or employees of such an organization, and employees of the school.
-- A requirement that the board make information concerning its operation and management available to the public and to the authorizing body in the same manner as required by State law for school districts.
-- A provision requiring the authorizing body to review, and allowing it to disapprove, any agreement between the board and an educational management organization before the agreement was final and valid.
-- A requirement that the board prohibit any individual from being employed by the school in more than one full-time position and simultaneously being compensated at a full-time rate for each of those positions.
-- A requirement that the board, if requested, report to the authorizing body the total compensation for each individual working at the school.
The contract also would have to require the board to collect, maintain, and make available to the public and the authorizing body at least all of the following information concerning the school's operation and management:
-- A copy of the contract.
-- A list of currently serving board members; copies of policies approved by the board; board meeting agendas and minutes; a copy of the budget approved by the board; and copies of bills paid for $10,000 or more.
-- Quarterly financial reports submitted to the authorizing body.
-- A current list of teachers and administrators working at the school, including their individual salaries, and copies of teaching or school administrator's certificates or permits.
-- Evidence of compliance with the criminal background and records checks and unprofessional conduct check required under the Code for all teachers and administrators working at the school.
-- Curriculum documents and materials given to the authorizing body.
-- Copies of any management contracts or services contracts approved by the board.
-- Copies of facility leases or deeds, or both, and of any equipment leases.
-- All health and safety reports and certificates.
-- Any management letters issued as part of the annual financial audit.
-- Any other information specifically required under the Code.
In addition, the contract would have to require the board to demonstrate all of the following to the satisfaction of the authorizing body with regard to its pupil admission process:
-- That the school had made a reasonable effort to advertise its enrollment openings.
-- That the school had made additional efforts (described in the bill) to recruit pupils who were eligible for special education programs and services or English-as-a-second-language services.
-- That the open enrollment period for the school lasted at least two weeks and included some evening and weekend times.
The term of an initial contract could not exceed five years from the start of the school year when the conversion school was to begin operating.
The educational goals of a conversion school would have to include making measurable progress toward improved pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils and toward meeting specific goals for improvement in pupil performance that the school would have to meet.
The goals also would have to include making measurable progress toward at least 80% of the school's pupils graduating from high school or being determined to be on track to graduate, and toward the school having at least 80% average attendance as determined by the Department of Education.
To the extent applicable, pupil performance would have to be assessed using at least a MEAP test or the Michigan Merit Exam.
A conversion school could not charge tuition or discriminate in its pupil admissions policies or practices on the basis of intellectual or athletic ability, measures of achievement or aptitude, status as a student with a disability, or any other basis that would be illegal if used by a school district. A conversion school, however, could limit admission to pupils who were within a particular range of age or grade level or on any other basis that would be legal if used by a school district.
Except for a foreign exchange student who was not a U.S. citizen, a conversion school could not enroll a pupil who was not a resident of Michigan. For a conversion school authorized by a school district or ISD, enrollment could be open to all State residents who met the admission policy, and would have to be open to all pupils residing within the geographic boundaries, if any, of the school district and ISD authorizing body who met the admission policy. For a conversion school authorized by a community college or public university, enrollment would have to be open to all State residents who met the admission policy.
Subject to the following provisions, if there were more applications to enroll in a conversion school than spaces available, a random selection process would have to be used to select pupils to attend.
A conversion school would have to give enrollment priority to a pupil who was previously enrolled in the school that was converted or who resided in the attendance area for that school as established by the school district at the time the petition was submitted under Section 1280c.
A conversion school could give enrollment priority to any of the following:
-- A sibling of a pupil enrolled in the school.
-- A pupil who transferred to the conversion school from another public school pursuant to a matriculation agreement between the two schools that provided for this enrollment priority, if specified requirements were met.
-- A child of a person who was employed by or at the conversion school or who was on its board of directors.
A conversion school would have to allow any pupil who was enrolled in the school in the previous school year to enroll in the appropriate grade, unless the school did not offer that grade.
A conversion school could include any grade up to grade 12 or any configuration of those grades, including kindergarten and early childhood education, as specified in its contract. A conversion school would have to include all of the grades that were previously operated by the school that was converted. If specified in its contract, a conversion school also could operate an adult basic education program, adult high school completion program, or general education development testing preparation program.
The authorizing body could approve a contract amendment with respect to ages of pupils or grades offered.
Conversion School Building
A conversion school would have to be located within the same attendance area of the school district that previously operated the school that was converted, as that attendance area existed when the petition was submitted under Section 1280c. A conversion could be located at the school building that was converted, as provided below.
If a conversion school intended to use the school building that was converted, it would have to send a letter of intent to the State Superintendent and to the school district that owned the building. Within 10 days after receiving the letter, the school district would have to lease the building to the conversion school for $1 per year for as long as the conversion school used the building for classroom instruction or for a shorter time at the option of the school.
If the conversion school closed or ceased using the school building for classroom instruction during the term of the lease, the school district, with the approval of the State Superintendent, could repossess the building, terminating the lease.
A school district could not lease a school building under these provisions if the lease would unconstitutionally impair a bond, note, security, or uncontested legal obligation of the district.
During the term of a lease, the conversion school would be responsible for the direct expenses related to the building, including utilities, insurance, maintenance, repairs, and remodeling. The school district would be responsible for any debt incurred for or liens that attached to the building before the conversion school leased it. The conversion school and the district could enter into a contract or cooperative arrangement concerning general liability insurance for the school.
Teachers; Teaching Techniques
Except as otherwise provided by law, a conversion school would have to use certificated teachers according to State Board of Education rule.
A conversion school authorized by a public university or community college could use noncertificated individuals to teach as follows:
-- A school authorized by a university could use as a classroom teacher in any grade a faculty member who was employed full-time by the university and who had been granted institutional tenure, or had been designated as being on tenure track, by the university.
-- A school authorized by a community college could use as a classroom teacher a full-time member of the college faculty who had at least five years' experience at the college in teaching the subject matter that he or she taught at the conversion school.
-- A noncertificated individual could be used in any other situation in which a school district was permitted under the Code to use noncertificated teachers.
A conversion school could develop and implement new teaching techniques or methods or significant revisions to known teaching techniques or methods, and would have to report them to the authorizing body and the State Board to be made available to the public. A conversion school could use any instructional technique or delivery method that a school district could use.
Contract Revocation; Corrective Measures
An authorizing body could revoke a contract issued under Part 6D if the authorizing body determined that any of the following had occurred:
-- The conversion school failed to demonstrate measurable progress toward improved pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils or toward meeting the educational goals set forth in the contract.
-- The school failed to comply with all applicable law.
-- The school failed to meet generally accepted public sector accounting principles and demonstrate sound fiscal stewardship.
-- There existed any other grounds for revocation specified in the contract.
Before revoking a contract, the authorizing body could consider and take corrective measures to avoid revocation. It could reconstitute the school in a final attempt to improve pupil educational performance or to avoid interruption of the educational process. An authorizing body would have to include a reconstituting provision in the contract that identified these corrective measures, including canceling a contract with an educational management organization, withdrawing approval of an employment contract, or appointing a new board of directors or a trustee to take over operation of the school.
If an authorizing body revoked a contract, it would have to work with the school district that operated the school that was converted, the State School Reform/Redesign Officer, or another school district or public school, or with a combination of them, to ensure a smooth transition for the affected pupils. If the revocation occurred during the school year, the authorizing body, as fiscal agent, would have to return to the State Treasurer any school aid funds it held that were attributable to the affected pupils, for deposit in the State School Aid Fund. The State Treasurer would have to distribute funds to the public school in which the pupils enrolled after the revocation according to a methodology established by the Department of Education and the Center for Educational Performance and Information.
If the conversion school were on the list of the lowest-achieving 5% of public schools in the State at the time of revocation, and were in continuous operation in the school building that had been converted, the SRRO would have to implement a new restructuring model in that school building under Section 1280c.
Except for a conversion school that was an alternative school serving a special student population, if the State Superintendent determined that a conversion school site that had been operating for at least four years was on the list of the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in the State, was in year two of restructuring sanctions under the No Child Left Behind Act, excluding the individualized education plan subgroup, and was not currently undergoing reconstitution, the Superintendent would have to notify the authorizing body. The authorizing body then would have to amend the conversion school's contract to eliminate the school's authority to operate the existing age and grade levels at the site and the school would have to cease operating those age and grade levels, effective at the end of the school year. If the conversion school operated at only one site, the authorizing body would have to revoke the school's contract, effective at the end of the school year.
If a conversion school, during the last school year of its initial contract with an authorizing body, were on the list of lowest-achieving 5% of public schools in the State, the board of the school could not seek to renew the contract with that authorizing body, and could not continue to operate the school after that school year unless the board obtained a new contract issued by another authorizing body.
Applicable Law; Immunity; Taxation
A conversion school would be required to comply with all applicable law, including the following:
-- The Open Meetings Act.
-- The Freedom of Information Act.
-- The public employment relations Act.
-- Public Act 166 of 1965 (the prevailing wage law).
A conversion school also would have to comply with the following sections of the Revised School Code:
-- Section 1134 (which deals with tagging the records of missing students).
-- Section 1135 (which requires proof of identity of enrolled students).
-- Section 1146 (which pertains to single-gender schools or classes).
-- Section 1153 (which allows bilingual programs).
-- Sections 1263(3) and 1267 (which deal with the construction of school buildings).
-- Section 1274 (which pertains to the procurement of supplies and equipment).
In addition, a conversion school would have to comply with law concerning participation in State assessments, data collection systems, State-level student growth models, State accountability and accreditation systems, and other public comparative data collection required for public schools.
A conversion school and its incorporators, board members, officers, employees, and volunteers would have governmental immunity as provided in Section 7 of the governmental immunity law (which extends immunity to employees, officers, and volunteers of a governmental agency for conduct that does not amount to gross negligence). An authorizing body and its board members, officers, and employees would be immune from civil liability for an act or omission in authorizing a conversion school if the body or person acted or reasonably believed he or she acted within the body's or person's scope of authority.
A conversion school would be exempt from all taxation on its earnings and property. Instruments of conveyance to or from a conversion school would be exempt from all taxation. Unless the property already was fully exempt from real and personal property taxes, property occupied by a conversion school and used exclusively for educational purposes would be exempt from real and personal property taxes levied for school operating purposes, to the extent exempted under Section 1211 of the Code, and from real and personal property taxes levied under the State Education Tax Act.
A conversion school could not levy ad valorem (value-based) property taxes or another tax for any purpose. The operation of one or more conversion schools by a school district or ISD, however, would not affect the ability of the school district or ISD to levy ad valorem property taxes or another tax.
If a school district or ISD applied for and obtained a contract to operate one or more conversion schools, the power of the district or ISD to levy taxes for any purpose under the Code would not be affected by the operation of a conversion school by the district or ISD. Revenue from taxes levied by a school district or ISD or bonds it issued could be used to support the operation or facilities of a conversion school operated by the district or ISD in the same manner as it could use that revenue to support school district or ISD operations and facilities.
Part 6D would not impose any liability on the State or on an authorizing body for any debt incurred by a conversion school.
With the approval of its authorizing body, a conversion school could employ or contract with personnel as necessary for the operation of the school, prescribe their duties, and set their compensation.
If the board of directors of a conversion school provided medical, optical, or dental benefits to employees and their dependents, the board would have to do so in accordance with the Public Employees Health Benefit Act and would have to comply with that Act.
Section 1280c Amendments
Notice of Placement on List
Section 1280c requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, by September 1 each year, to publish a list identifying the public schools in the State that the Department of Education has determined to be among the lowest-achieving 5% of all public schools in the State. The Superintendent then must issue an order placing each school on the list under the supervision of the State School Reform/Redesign Officer. Within 90 days after that, the school board or board of directors must submit a redesign plan to the SRRO. The redesign plan must require implementation of one of the following four school intervention models: turnaround model, restart model, school closure, or transformation model. (References to a school board also include a board of directors.)
Under the bill, the order placing schools under the SRRO's supervision would have to be issued within seven days after the list was published, and the requirements for submitting a redesign plan would be subject to following provisions.
The bill would require the board of a school, within seven days after the school was placed under the supervision of the SRRO, to issue a written notification to the parent or legal guardian of each pupil enrolled in the school, and to publish the notification on its internet website homepage.
The notification would have to include an explanation that the school had been placed under the supervision of the SRRO due to its pupil performance and that, unless the parents submitted to the Department a petition recommending a school intervention model, the school board would work with the SRRO to adopt and implement a school intervention model and redesign plan for the school, as provided under Section 1280c.
The notification also would have to include an explanation of each school intervention model that was available as an option to the school board and to the parents and legal guardians, as well as an explanation of the process, requirements, and timeline for eligible parents and legal guardians to submit a parental petition to the Department recommending a school intervention model.
In addition, the notification would have to describe the consequences of a school intervention model recommended by a parental petition compared to the consequences of a redesign plan implemented under current provisions of Section 1280c, including the different consequences with regard to being placed in the State School Reform/Redesign school district.
The bill would define "eligible parent or legal guardian" as the parent or legal guardian of a pupil enrolled in the public school that was the subject of a the parental petition, if the pupil were enrolled in the school on the first day of the applicable school year, or became enrolled in the school after the first day but before the petition was submitted, and the pupil remained enrolled in the school at the time the petition was submitted.
"Eligible teacher" would mean a teacher employed and working full time at the public school to be converted at the time the parental petition was submitted.
Parental Petition; Intervention Model
Within 90 days after a public school was placed under the SRRO's supervision, a person could submit a parental petition recommending a single school intervention model to be implemented for the public school in a redesign plan. Within 30 days after receiving a parental petition, the Department would have to do both of the following:
-- Forward a copy of the petition to the board operating the public school, the ISD in which it was located, and the SRRO.
-- Examine the petition to determine if it contained the number of valid signatures required and a single school intervention model to be implemented in a redesign plan.
If the Department certified that a parental petition had been submitted within the applicable time limit, contained the valid signatures of at least 60% of the eligible parents or legal guardians, or of at least 51% of the eligible parents or legal guardians and at least 60% of the eligible teachers, and recommended a school intervention model that could be implemented for the public school in a redesign plan, the Department would have to notify the person submitting the petition and the school board that the petition had been certified, and the following requirements would apply.
The school board would have to work with the SRRO to implement the recommended school intervention model in a redesign plan for the following year, if the recommended model were a restructuring model other than the restart model. If the school board already had adopted and implemented or were in the process of implementing a redesign plan when the petition was submitted, however, the school board would have to incorporate elements of the parental petition to the extent that they were consistent with the redesign plan that had been adopted.
If the school intervention model recommended in the petition were the restart model, and if the public school were not a public school academy, the parents and legal guardians could apply to the authorizing body for a contract to operate the public school as a conversion school, as provided under Part 6D. If a contract were obtained, then the public school would have to be operated as a conversion school beginning in the following school year. If the parental petition recommended the restart model but an application for a conversion school contract were not submitted or a contract could not be obtained within 60 days after the petition was certified, or if the school were a public school academy, the school board would have to work with the SRRO to implement the restart model for the following school year, as provided in the Code. If the school board did not implement the restart model, the SRRO would have to issue an order placing the school in the State School Reform/Redesign school district, imposing implementation of one of the four intervention models beginning with the start of the next school year, and imposing an addendum to each applicable collective bargaining agreement in effect for the school as necessary to implement the intervention model.
The eligible parents and legal guardians for a public school could create a parental advisory committee to work with the school board and the SRRO to implement the recommended school intervention model and redesign plan.
If the Department determined not to certify a parental petition because it either did not contain enough valid signatures or did not recommend a single school intervention model that could be implemented under Section 1280c, the Department would have to notify the person submitting the petition and the school board that it had determined not to certify the petition and the reasons for the determination. The determination could be appealed as a final decision or order in a contested case as provided under the Administrative Procedures Act.
A person who circulated or otherwise sought to obtain signatures on a parental petition could not offer or provide any money, gift, or other compensation in exchange for a signature on the petition. A person also could not coerce or intimidate another person with respect to signing or declining to sign a petition.
If a school board found that there was reason to believe that there could be fraud or a violation of those prohibitions in connection with the signatures on a parental petition, the board would have to refer its findings to the appropriate county prosecutor for possible criminal action.
The Superintendent of Public Instruction would have to promulgate rules to implement the bill's amendments to Section 1280c. The rules would have to address at least the form and content of a parental petition, the process for submitting a petition to the Department, and a process for notifying the person submitting a petition.
Delayed Placement in Reform/Redesign District
If a school board implemented the school intervention model that was recommended in a parental petition and included in the redesign plan, or if a contract were obtained under Part 6D to operate the school as a conversion school, the SRRO could not issue an order placing the school in the State School Reform/Redesign district before the expiration of five years after the beginning of the first school year in which the school intervention model was implemented or the school was operated as a conversion school.
State: Unless the conversion of existing schools into "conversion schools" resulted in a net increase in student enrollment (which would result in increased State costs), there would be no fiscal impact on the State under this legislation.
Local: For each local school building that was reorganized as a conversion school, the district in which that school building was a part would see a reduction in revenue, unless the district were the authorizing body of the conversion school. In instances where the authorizing body was not the local district, the reduction in revenue would be equal to the number of students previously enrolled in the school building that converted, multiplied by the district's foundation allowance. The new conversion school would be the recipient of that revenue, less a 3% administrative oversight fee paid to the authorizer.
A conversion school would have a comparative advantage over other districts because of the $1 rent charged for the school building, as required by the legislation. In most, if not all other instances, the cost for school buildings in both local districts and public school academies exceeds $1. Public school academies pay for buildings out of their operating funds; local districts may ask for locally voted millage to raise revenue for buildings, or pay for them out of operating funds. Either way, the costs typically exceed $1, and therefore the low cost of rent for a conversion school would give it a comparative advantage through lower infrastructure costs. In addition, if the conversion school building were still being paid off from a bond election, the district in which that building is located would remain responsible for paying off those bonds.
Also, conversion schools not authorized by local districts could use noncertificated teachers, which, depending on the wages and benefits offered, could have fiscal implications when compared to the hiring of certificated teachers.
Finally, employees at the conversion schools would not be part of the Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement System (MPSERS). Each time membership within that system declines (due to privatization, retirements, conversion schools, etc.), the cost of the existing accrued unfunded liabilities is spread among remaining payrolls of all participating entities, and the contribution percentages remitted by the remaining payrolls increase. Therefore, the resulting fiscal implications are not uniform. Districts where school buildings were converted would see a relative gain compared to districts without conversions (by losing payroll subject to MPSERS retirement contribution rates). Again, the unfunded liabilities are a fixed number, to be paid off by spreading the cost over total payroll. When MPSERS payroll declines in a nonuniform fashion, entities or their payrolls remaining in the system will be adversely affected by having to pay for the liabilities that were stranded by the payrolls that exited the system.
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.